Regarding Gift Of Deed Cancellation Suit

Dev (Querist) 09 February 2017 This query is : Resolved
Dear Team

In the last Page of the cancellation suit my lawyer has written , that we authorize our lawyer to deposit, receive any amount of money in the court from our behalf , is it a correct statement ?
because recieving any amount of money ? is a big question

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 10 February 2017
Incomplete information.

Discuss with your lawyer or another local lawyer with case file/plaint.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 10 February 2017
Generally you should believe in your lawyer. If no belief may change your lawyer.

Document need to be seen, may discuss with your lawyer if the same need to be amended from you.

ABDUL RAZIQUE (Expert) 10 February 2017
When you appoint a lawyer to appear, file or proceed the matter before the Ld. court that means you have faith upon him and if any question arise or doubt present on the deliver point or sentences it is better to consult your lawyer and if you have no faith upon your Ld. Counsel than it is better to change for future.

Adv. Yogen Kakade (Expert) 27 February 2017
I agree with the experts

Advocate Ravinder (Expert) 14 May 2017
There is no need to believe Advocate in respect of money. Client gives vakalat only to contest the case. There are many frauds by the Advocates are happening in the society. Hence, the client will naturally doubt upon the money to be received by the other side.

Hence, it is better to take the money in the form of cheque/payorder/DD instead of cash. Hence, the client can change the instructions as I said above.

Guest (Expert) 14 May 2017
There are Good and Bad in all the Professions.There is BCI to Control the Advocates and any malpractice conducted by Advocates the BCI Or the State Bar Council is there which would Certainly take strong Steps."There Is no need to believe Advocate in respect of money " is an Defamation Statement and that too from a Person who claimed to Served as Junior to Advocates who were elevated as Honorable Judges is not a Pleasant Statement in this Platform.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now