ni act

rajan chopra (Querist) 15 September 2013 This query is : Resolved
An accused in a cheque bounce case took a defence stand that he had already paid the amount of cheque in question so he can not be convicted. In fact the transaction shown by accused was a seperate one and it was not meant to clear amount of cheque in question. Now can this defence stand help accused in any way?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (Expert) 16 September 2013
Burden lies on him to prove the payment. You can cross examine him when he leads his evidence.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 16 September 2013
He has to prove that he has payed the amount against the cheque.

V R SHROFF (Expert) 16 September 2013
IT IS A HEADACHE OF ACCUSED.
You have to cross examine him to prove he did not pay chq amt. I

Nadeem Qureshi (Expert) 16 September 2013
nothing left to add

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 17 September 2013
I have also the simlar opinion.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

ni act

Similar Resolved Queries :