praveen
03 May 2014 at 23:02
sir i got sarfaesi 13/2 which is pure illegal and proofed by rti application's ans, so may i fire case for defamation against bank and its manger who intentionally serve sarfaesi 13/2 to me and my guarantor , and what is the procedure to fire case against bank for defamation
Varun Suri
03 May 2014 at 22:22
Dear Sir,
A year back we had beaten by our society member in the colony, against which we both raised a police complaint and got our medicals from govt hospitals and we have compromise out side the court.
At present the case has logged against us by the police and our case has not been registered, after the court intervention our report has been registered in which the opposition has put the compromise copy.
And keep on assuring us that they will compromise in the court for the case filled by them but never comes to court.
Need suggestion on following:
1. If our case has been cancelled then why the opposition case in court, we cant put the compromise copy in that.
2. The medical submitted by them is in different dates and the hospital has cancelled the previous one and asked the court to consider second, can a medical issued once can be cancelled and both the medical are not duly stamped by the hospital and the doctor.
We are continuously getting thread by them, kindly help us to get out of this.
With Regards..
Varun
Mustafa Bhat
03 May 2014 at 22:19
Sir,
Today I discussed my 498A & 406 Case with my friend who is also a Lawyer.I got confused rather than advise.
PW in while deposing Statement in Court said
1)That I have beaten my wife because of which she gave birth to a dead baby.
When cross examined they said we didnot asked Doctor for such report & the accused tendered apology.So didnot made complain at that time to police.
While as nothing this sought has been mentioned in 161 Statement of PW.
My friend said to me that 161 loses its credibility after deposing Statement in court.
Is it so,I feel it is afterthought & addition to 161, which is in benefit of accused but he said no.
Please advise will it help me are complainant.
2)Another PW in Court said I told him that my inlaws have promised give/buy a flat for me which they didnot.
This could not be cross examined as it i feel skipped out of mind of my lawyer.
While as nothing this sought has been mentioned in 161 Statement of PW.
Same was said to me by friend what he said about earlier case.
Please advise will it help me are complainant.
3)Another PW in Court said I demand car & cash from them.
While as nothing this sought has been mentioned in 161 Statement of PW.
Same was said to me by friend what he said about earlier case.
Please advise will it help me are complainant.
They said lot of grab but these 2/3 points are addition to their 161 statements.
I got confused please help me out.
4) But 2 out of these 3 PWs said we made complain in police so that compromise will take place at the end in cross examination after saying lot of grab.
5) Main Complainant (lady) is still to be cross examined.
mahesh basu
03 May 2014 at 22:03
Hi friends,
A FIR was registered U/S 420 , 467, 468, 471, 120 B against 15 persons. Now complainant has compromised the matter with 5 persons but not with rest of the persons.
Today petition under 482 was filed in HC for quashing FIR on the basis of compromise.
Now i have few questions to ask.
1. All the accused have been named as respondents alongwith complainant with 1 accused which is a company being the petitioner.
So does this states that this is compromise with all accused ? Because if this was a partial compromise why would the accused with whom compromise is not made be made respondents ? Am i correct in my logic?
2. Its written in the petition that all the accused are arrayed as party in the present petition. It is also written that none of the accused is Proclaimed Offender.
Does this line means that this is full compromise and the complainant can't now speak against the accused with whom he had not yet compromised ? Or does this line states that compromise is done with all the accused ?
Please help me friends. This is really important for me.
Santanu
03 May 2014 at 21:29
(i) Can Police call some witness of other province on the strength of section 160 Cr.P.C.? If yes, the ruling reference may be communicated in reply.
(ii) Is it possible that Police call some witness under reference of some Memo no. and not of any specific case?
RJ
03 May 2014 at 20:32
Hi
My company is not issuing me relieving/experience letter they are asking me to submit my original passport for checking purpose they want to check all visa/ICT/WP status because they do not keep employee records though my work permit is already expired in January.
I have served full two months notice period and my manager has also relieved me in my exit form and all the clearance is done except Travel & HR department, Proper handover is also done i have all these proofs.
When i was onsite i have applied my own permit and once got it came back here to resign from this company.
Kindly advise...
Thanks & Regards,
MSC Shekar
03 May 2014 at 18:35
In a Civil Suit Plaintiff private party with two Govt. Depts as Defendants. A IA / Petition was filed for production of Documents / Records in possession of Govt Dept.
The petition for call for records/documents has been allowed by the Hon'ble Trial Court.
But the Concerned Defendant/Govt. Dept produced records/documents other than what was called / allowed by the Hon'ble Trial Court.
Does this action of Govt. Dept amount to purgery ?
Thanks in advance
pushkar nehete
03 May 2014 at 18:15
Respected learned members, I am seeking your expert opinion that, whether any Proprietary Concern firm can be a partner in any Partnership firm?
Ramesh Kumar Pandey
03 May 2014 at 18:13
Dear sir,
We are manufacturer having excise regd. and Import a some materials from Singapore. and after verification the materials is excess from our uses So we want sale the excess materials as such the We want to know about Excise Duty Structure ? We also take a befit addl. duty and excise duty
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sale of gaothan land
Some local gundas forced my friend` father to sell the land for the minimum amount, far below than the market rate to the local person by threatening to kill him and his son. Now after Four years from the date of sale,When my friend who was working in Banglore,returned , his dad revealed this thing to him. My friend is the only son and did not ever give his permission or NOC to sell the land. as he is the only nominee, What are the legal remedies available to him to prove this deal illegal thereby cancelling this deal & acquire his land back? What is the time limit available for him to take action after the sell of the land?