LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   17 June 2018 at 16:48

498A Case

One Surety is enough or what in a 498 A case (case in court is pending due to the inconvenience of parties to attend), wherein there is already a mutual settlement and both husband and wife are staying together for the last 10 months...

Anonymous   17 June 2018 at 16:28

Is it possible for nullify my husband second marriage

My husband got second marriage without my permission. I wanna nullify it. Is it possible ? Can I send legal notice to the particular register office? ? ?

dr.pannalal nawalkha   17 June 2018 at 16:10

Applicability of base rate for proprtie from 2002-2003

PROPERTY WAS SOLD IN FY 2015-16 be considered for base rate of 2001 for valuation purposes.AT present from FY 2016-17 base rate for valuation has been fast forwarded to 2001. My submission that since 2001 is taken as base year,its applicability be from 2002-2003. your opinion solicited pannala nawalkha

Kuldeep   17 June 2018 at 14:09

Any ruling by supreme court claiming for appointment

Hello sir
The interviews of 56 candidates shortlisted on the basis of written examination conducted on 15-05-2016 for the post of [08] scientist B in the ministry of new and renewable energy were held from 11 to 13 April 2018
2 Out of total 56 candidates called for Interview, Only 50 appeared before the interview board
3. The board did not find any candidate suitable for appointment as scientist B in the ministry.keeping in mind the technical competence and preparedness required for this job
4. the weight age of marks in written examination and interview was 85 : 15
5 one candidate got 262 out of 300 marks in written examination where cut of for general category was 204 6. when we applied for RTI we got not information anything about interview mark , criteria for selection etc
7.there was no secure mark fixed in advertisement for interview and written examination
i want to consult should we file for case or not .would be beneficial .if we file for case which point should we highlights

Anonymous   17 June 2018 at 12:55

Late intimation of non purchase of land

My sister has applied in the year 1998 for purchase of a plot of land to her office(Central Government). Then she was in Gr. C cadre. Source of majority portion of money was interest free loan from her father. Office gave her approval to purchase the land by issuing an order. But before purchasing the same, her father unfortunately died. As a result the plan for purchase the land had been dropped due shock of death as well as want of fund. She did not intimate the same to her office then.
Recently her office has issued an office memorandum as she has submitted 'NIL' IPR report being a Gr B officer now to clarify the issue.
Kindly advice me what to do now. Is there any probability to take disciplinary action for intimating earlier? Please help my sister with your valuable advice.

Milind Bhoyar   17 June 2018 at 12:45

Regarding increment

Dear sir,
I had join as lecturer in msbte govt aided college in 17 june 2013. But after changing management they imigiately terminated me dated on 21 may 2014. After that I had filed case in school court. Then court allowed me to rejoin the college with continuity in services and all backwages dated on 1 december 2014. dte given me the order to rejoin and termination period treat as extraordinory leave. Because of this college didnt gave me the increment for that termination period. Even they told me that because Government 6th pay rules we can gave you increment only in july. So they skip my one increment of july 2014. Please advice me for the same.

Anonymous   17 June 2018 at 11:45

Interpretation of fidic cl 12.3, red book, 1999 edition

My quarry is still unresoved
If executed quantity of a particular item is 130% of scheduled Bill of quantities and all other conditions of 12.3 (a) (i) to (iv) are met should the new rates be applied as per conditions of the contract (Clause 12.3 of Fidic Red book, 1999) for entire executed quantity, 30% of quantity (exceeding BOQ quantity) or 120% quantity(exceeding the threshold value of 110%). Please convey your opinion

Amit   17 June 2018 at 11:33

NI Act Case

Complainant Send legal Notice for recovery of amount of bounced cheque to the accused on wrong Address and Files a case in court saying that accused with the connivance with post man returned the Notice , whereas in actual Notice was send on wrong address.

In complaint application to court mentioned the correct address of accused and summon was served to accused on accused appeared in court and got bail and also asked for the documents of Complaint.

Accused was liable to pay the amount

Now my question in light of above facts us that

1. Whether case is sustainable on the grounds of non service of Notice.

2. If accused decided to pay the amount to the court without the consent of Complaint will it be possible to deposit the amount?

Anonymous   17 June 2018 at 09:25

Withdrawal of perjury proceedings

Some matrimonial cases are running between x and her wife y.separated wife y filed a case of 125 crpc against husband where she makes some false statements relating her job and being aggrived from those false statements husband x files an application of crpc 340 read with 195 and prays the family court to take appropriate actions against her wife for her false statements which are supported by sworn affidavit. After preliminary inquiry being satisfied from the application of husband family court registrar lodge a complaint against wife in a competent court and a case has got registered in the title named -state vs.wife y. Now after registration of such case wife feels her mistake and request the husband for ending such type case proceedings in the welfare of family and kids and wants to come back at husband's home with full compromise. my question is- are there any ways available with husband by which he can stop such perjury proceedings ? Is it possible via 482 that such proceedings may be stopped by high Court upon the joint request of both husband and wife as States involved in it ?will state permit such type situation?

S.Surendra Sharma Sharma   17 June 2018 at 06:06

Property sold before final decree

Sir/sirs To make a long story short: 3/4 of a building was sold surreptitiously by my kin just after the preliminary decree ruling that I have a claim for 1/4 of the share. My kin are absentee claimants. Therfore they sold their 3/4 of the share to a third party for a throwaway price of Rs.12 lakhs - a property that would fetch nearly a crore in 2004! Now the third party claims the 3/4 of the property(building) and asked the lower Court to pass a final decree in his favour as he is the purchaser! Is he entitled to claim as the buyer during this pendency period(final decree)? What doe the law say? Please enlighten me.