Somnath mukherjee
12 April 2009 at 13:58
My wife filed a case u/s498a,313,506,34 I.P.C against me and my family in kalyan court u/s 156(3) on 22-2-2007 and case was subsiquently rejected by the Ld.C.J.M on the grund of jurisdiction.After some days my mother-in-law files another case u/s498a,323,326,328,313,315,148,457,147,427,504,506,120B I.P.C against me by colouring the same cause of action and upon the same court by supressing the previous one.The police has already filed a chargesheet but the charge is yet to be framed.Whether this case is tenable? Whether i can file quashing? Which one is better for me? Please suggest some relevent case laws.
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
12 April 2009 at 13:41
Respected sir,
my client's fateher was servicing as lascer in the air force after the death of the said fellow his son appled for the compensatiate service airforce passed his sanctioned and offered D catagory job but myclient denied and demanded the C catagory then airforce did not given any co-peration so my client went in the tribunal at ahmedabad tribunal has been given directions to do proper within three months of the order of tribunal but after the 3 to 4 year airforce replied that ur application does not comes into the pervie of merits hence ur application is rejected now what i have to do ?
can i do application in the highcourt for the contempt of the court in the tribunal for the not following the order within stipulated time?
can i go to high court against the order of the airforce ?
please give me reply thankin u in advance
tendulkar.S
12 April 2009 at 04:33
Dear Sirs,
I work as a security officer in bangalore for a reputed security agency, could anyone guide me about my rights in respect to subjects like esi, pf etc ???
Dr.Mumbiram
11 April 2009 at 22:40
Artist Dr. Mumbiram is an Indian citizen. His wife and son have German passports. Through various malafide avoidance tactics the local Foreigner Registration Office failed to forward without any reason our application for a 5 year visa extension for our son, who has a German passport, to the Office of the Principal Secretary(special) Home Dept. Maharashtra, who is the competent authority to grant such extensions as well as the authority to seek redressal of grievances against local FROs. Our personal appearances at the Princ.Sec.’s Office, letters and a formal complaint against the local FROs also produce no relief. For a period of over 2 years we were even without an interim visa extension for our son, whose earlier visa had expired in the meantime. We have filed a Writ Petition in the Bombay High Court requesting the court to direct the local FRO and the Princ. Sec.’s Office to grant us the 5year visa extension for which we had applied for over 2 years ago. We have also asked the court to direct the Respondents to pay us compensation for the grievous damages we suffered on account of the malafide inactions of the respondents. In the first hearing the court appeared almost certain to grant our request for the visa extension but we are not so sure about the compensation part. We feel justice will not be fully served if we only get the visa extensions that we should have gotten 2 years ago. We feel we deserve exemplary damages (punitive damages) from the respondents for the damages we suffered on account of the malafide inactions of the Respondents. How should we argue before the court for our request for such compensation ?
A Truthseeker
11 April 2009 at 19:57
death sentence is awarded in rarest of rare case.but so far as man is concerned is there any case that can be termed as rarest of rare? our scripture enjoins each soul is potentially divine. dacoit and ghoul Ratnakar was so corrected nay transformed that he became the greatest poet to compose Ramayan.incarceration for the rest of the life would not do instead of death?
sampat mane
11 April 2009 at 16:59
Dear Experts,
I am holding ICICI bank credit card and against my purchase I had made a payment by Internet. This payment did not reflect in my next statement as the intermediary (processing house bungled up with credit card no.).
Due to this i was charged exhorbitant penalty without any fault of mine. I argued with the ICICI bank and asked for reversal. ICICI bank did not help me in any form.
Hence I stopped usig the card and accordingly I mailed them the status.
Their was no reply but a statement charging me penalty for every month of non-payment of old dues (which was not).
Finally since i was holding a savings account with them, they deducted the amount arbitrarily without even prior informing me. I got a letter from them after 5 days of the deduction.
What action can i take against these arbitrary decision?
Where can I approach? i have copy of all the correspondence I have done with them and their reply on it.
Please Help
rgd
Aparna Mane
Urjit Shukla
11 April 2009 at 16:53
Dear experts,
plz informe me that how much cases are pending in diffrent type of courts in all over India.
Urjit Shukla
11 April 2009 at 16:42
Dear all experts,
As I want to know that Which type of Questions will arise in P.P.'s interview?
Plz give some exampel questions.
What should I have to prepair for interview?
Any other Instruction if any.
Jitendra Raval
11 April 2009 at 15:58
The accused handed over two cheque to the complainant which was singed but without payee name and date,amount etc in good payment for payment of insurance premium in 2002.
There were few financial transations between the two but nothing was due. When relation between the two spoiled, the complainant filled up the blanks and lodged the cheques in 2008 which was bounce as the account was inoperative after some time after his transfer.
The complainant filled the blanks but forget to strike bearer and hence these cheques remain bearer when presented for payment and returned unpaid.
My question is "Whether the bearer cheques covered under S.138' If not kindly provide me the citation.
Or it does't metter the cheques in question was bearer or order.
Kidly reply
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Review of the Allowed writ petition in the High Court-Scope
A writ petition was filed by the Administration of Puducherry Administration for quashing the directions of the Central Adminstrative Tribunal, Chennai. Pending disposal of the writ, prayed for stay also against the directions of the CAT. When the case came for hearing, a notice was served to the opponent for reply. The Respondent/Opponent had filed a reply also praying not to grant stay, pending to submit a detailed written statement elaborating the the nature of the case, the relevant rules, and case laws, under the strong belief that the case will be taken up later. But, surprisingly, the writ was allowed without giving a reasonable opportunity for elaborate argument. But, the speaking order which was hastily pronounced has lot of apparent errors on the face of record reflecting incorrect information of facts of the case itself. The facts of the case was totally misconstrued due to non application of mind of the judge with relevant rules framed under article 309 of the constitution.This has led to huge financial loss to the Respondent, being retired senior citizen.
What is the remedy to rectify the wrong judgment pronounced by the judge hastily without giving a reasonable opportunity to the opponent. In this case, the respondent is not willing to go for appeal in the supreme court due to financial stress and also time consuming.
Please advise expert opinion in this case