Narender kumar
25 April 2009 at 09:45
Hello Respected all, I want to suggest & want to know that how my suggestion can take legal stand. My suggetion is that to Improve voter percentage there should be a vote cast certificate which must be issued by presiding officer in favour of voter,this certificate must compulsory for all gov. facilities like DL,Pass port,addmission of children & other Important activities.Thus certificate will last long till next election.This type of action can improve vote cast percentage in our country.
p k kapoor
25 April 2009 at 08:11
IN case of payment EDLI charge,the requirement under EMPloyees' Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme is as follows:
"No amount is recovered from employee's wages . Employer should pay 0.5% of total wages subject to a ceiling of Rs. 6500/- per month ( w.e.f. 1-06-2001)."
In case of an organisation, however, this EDLI charge was calculated on total wages till March 2009 instead of restricting EDLI charge to the wage ceiling amount of Rs.6500. The matter was discussed with EPFO organisation and they stated that it can be adjusted in future payments.
My query is
(1)Under which circular of Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), adjustment of this payment is allowed.
(2) What is the provision in this regard in relevant EPFO rule/act position
(3) Whether this recovery from future payment, can be made from total amount payable to EPFO or recovery of this excess EDLI payment is to be restricted against future EDLI payment only.
Iqbal A. M. Shaikh
25 April 2009 at 06:59
Dear All,
My son died in an accident on Dec 26, 2008. He was working for a compnay who had subscribed to a Corporate Group Personal Accident Policy from Bajaj Allianz.
I had claimed through the company for the claim under the said policy. After submission of all the relevant documents the Insurer is persistently sent emails that it will take 10-15 days for the claim and the matter is under investigation. One of their TPA had sent some investigator to my house and he insisted on phone for documents and then collected all the documents duly notorized from me. He also had some sort of form in which he wrote his report. Now the Bajaj Allianz people have sent me an email that it will take another one month to process the claim and the claim is under investigation.
I would request you to guide me on the following.
1. Does any previous accidental injury which did not result in any disability has any bearing on the claim. Does the revelation of the same in proposal form essential.
2. Is there any remedy through which I could compell insurer for an early settlement of my claim.
3. What are the legal remedies. Please cite relevant provisions and case laws.
4. What are the options of approaching IRDA.
5. Procedure of writs to compell for an early settlement.
6. In case of denial, legal remedies available.
Thank you,
Regards,
Iqbal
vinod bansal
24 April 2009 at 22:47
Respected All
I filed a pvt crl complaint against Supdt. of police in the court of chief judicial magistrate & today case was fixed for arguments,arguments were advanced by me & now case is fixed for 20-7-09 for consideration on summoning, Magistrate is biased & he knowingly case adjourned for a long date,I want to file a Application for early hearing,what should be grounds & what is remedy available to me in this regard.Thanks
DEVENDRA
24 April 2009 at 22:14
In Maharashtra co-op.societies Act, there are two sections regarding recovery of loans. One u/s 101 and another u/s 91.
Enquiry u/s 101 is quasi judicial and is of summary nature. Whereas u/s 91, full trial is conducted.
In such circumstances, if one society approaches u/s 101 for recovery of arrears of loan amount till the date of filing application, and obtains certificate u/s 101, and on failuer to recover the amount, the sociaty approaches u/s 91 to recover entire loan amount ( and not only arrears ), then whether the act of the society to apply u/s 91 wil be res-judicata ?
If anyone has citation regarding it, please convey.
yogesh
24 April 2009 at 21:44
Dear Sir,
I will be grateful, if you provide me the information on the following:
I have filed an O.A application along with the Annexures and Miscallenous Application (M.A) which was attached with the O.A
Please inform whether I will get the M.A Number along with the O.A Number or I should have to file it separately?
Thanking you,
Regards
yogesh
24 April 2009 at 21:34
Dear Sir,
I will be grateful if you provide me the proper information on the following:
I have filed the Application in The Central Administrative Tribunal (4 sets) as there are two respondents along with the postal order and two file sized envelope and I was informed that it will take 2-3 days for scrutinizing purpose and then will provide the O.A Number
Please inform whether the registrar office( Filing Office) will send the copy of application to the respondents ? or I will have to send the copy via speed post/Registry to each Respondent?
Whether there will be any process fees in the Registrar office (Filing Office) will send the same to the respondents? Please inform me the amount of fees?
Whether at the time of admission of application, the respondents will be informed that the application will be admitted ? or they will summoned to appear only after hearing from the applicant side?
How can I know about the date of admission as the cause list will be displayed on the same date?
Thanking you
A Truthseeker
24 April 2009 at 20:49
in The Mahabharata we got Droupadi was rescued when Dushyashan attempted to denude her.but Bhima was so exasperated as he took the vow to kill and drink the blood o Dushyashan. that signifies how the Indian women were looked at once upon a time.in IPC outraging modesty of an woman is a bailable offence.sud this British legacy still exist in Indian law?
vinod bansal
24 April 2009 at 17:56
R/All
when we can say that court has taken cognizance spl. in private complaint cases & in FIR (State) Cases, My query is in context of section 197 crpc in which sanction order is compulsary while taking cognizance against a public servent..in my case i had filed a pvt. complaint against Supdt. Of Police & preliminary evidence has closed & now case is fixed for consideration/order on summoning.whether sanction is mandatory prior to issue summoning order against a public servent in complaint case.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
telecommunication
towers implanted in the residential areas by the the telecom companies causing harm to the people through radiations.any case or citation or any precendent with effect to this for my case. plz give me the answer.