Shekhar Warhate
11 September 2009 at 20:22
i am defendant i have possession of suit land but in 7/12 extracct perva in the name of plaintiff. now i apply to tahsildar and requested to investigate the matter and put the name in perva the person who possessed suit land. the talathi in spot pachnama put his remark that the suit field in the possession of defendant. is it sufficient to prove the possession on suit land. the case is fixed for hearing on exh.5 tell me with recent case laws.riven
Tipsy
11 September 2009 at 20:05
Is it compulsory to file M-20 Bond by all the members of the Committee? Is it to be executed jointly or individually? What are the consequences of not filing it with the Societies Registrar? Can anyone send me the text of the M-20 bond to my email:
april2march@gmail.comriven
Shivani Kadam
11 September 2009 at 19:30
Is there any partisular site from where we can get the case details of case laws related to impeachment?
Can art.124 cl.5 constitutional law of india could be taken as adefense for improper impeachment process?
can motion of the house be considered valid even after the house is dissolved and a new houde is formed in the same year?
riven
Amarjeet yadav
11 September 2009 at 19:19
hi, In my case i m the complainant in a case u/s 302/34 ipc. the trail court aquitted the accuseds in absance of proper evidence(as the police under the influence of the accuseds doesnot produce the all evidence). i made appeal to the high court through state which was dismissed by the high court. Now i want to go for supreme court but the state is not willing to go for supreme court. now can u plz tell me:-
1. whether i can go to supreme court under slp being a informant/complainant.
2. what if the state does not appeal in this?
3. if yes under what provision.
riven
Shekhar Warhate
11 September 2009 at 19:17
my party is bank, a person borrowed the loan from my bank and not paid the loan amount. person issued the cheque in the name of bank of joint account of person and his father cheque bounsed with funds insufficient. after some days the person who borrowed the loan is died,bank give me the bounced cheque for sending notice u/s138 of n.i.act. is he liable for the loan of his son due to joint accout and is he come wihtin the criateria of n.i.act tell me with ciatetionriven
Saj
11 September 2009 at 18:54
The current share certificate is signed by the present Chairman/MD of the company. Is it required to change the share certificate if a new Chairman/MD joins ?
riven
naresh
11 September 2009 at 18:06
how to regiser group/sanghatna. witch is working in the intrest of perticular language peopleriven
Arunkumar R
11 September 2009 at 17:55
My father had executed a debt bond for borrowing 50000 in 1999. My Mother had also signed on it. My Father had been paying interest on it till mid 2003 and paid back the principal in late 2003. He had negotiated to waive of the interest for few months, A friend of my father who had signed as witness did the negotiation and he kept the bond with him without returning it to us. In 2004 the friend along with lender moved a complaint in the police station against us claiming the money was not paid and after some discussions the police station said to move the complaint in court which the lender never did.
My question is,
The bond was last signed in 2003 does it still hold good ?
I am willing to gift a property to my mother.
Can the lender now cause trouble to us because my mother also co-signed in the original bond and the bond is also in his possession with him till now?riven
Sumir
11 September 2009 at 17:49
can any one tell me difference between writ petition, and criminal application and mode of payment of the fees?riven
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Extra charges by mobile company
Can I file a case against the company for extra mobile call charges which i have not made. please advice.riven