sir

how much a employer has to pay the dependent if there is a death of the work-man in the course of employment i.e. for funeral expences

bank account freezing - method

In 138 NI case, (j.m.Court) Summon served .... accused not appear
NBW issued... not execute... accused not appear before court
Proclamation order u/s 82 cr.pc. passed and published ... accused not appear
in this position ... can we able to freeze the accused bank account u/s.83 cr.p.c? if possible which section is suitable ? Who has power to freeze bank account?If you are having model draft kindly display .

Accused in Delhi... filing JM court is in Tamilnadu ... accused doing MLM business .... the accused firm having only immovable proberty ...

inquiry

I have conducted one inquiry in one company .Thereafter on the basis of inquiry report managment has dissmissed the deliquent workman and workman has raised indusrtial dispute under I.D Act& matter refered to labour court for adjudication .Now my question is whether can i appear as an advocate on behalf company in court?

inquiry

I have conducted one inquiry in one company .Thereafter on the basis of inquiry report managment has dissmissed the deliquent workman and workman has raised indusrtial dispute under I.D Act& matter refered to labour court for adjudication .Now my question is whether can i appear as an advocate on behalf company in court?

can a gift deed be revoked by the heir of a donor?

Hi,

My father (who has now passed away) was gifted a small piece of land and the donor too has now passed away. Unfortunately none of the heirs of the donee have got the title transferred in their name. Now the son of the donor has filed an application to take back the land that was gifted, on the ground that none of the heirs of the donee have transferred the property. Is this tenable?
A quick response will be highly appreciated .

Many thanks in advance.

pan card

what are the legal implications of having more than 1 pan card?

sec 138

DEAR SIR
I HAVE ISSUED A NOTICE FOR RETURN CHEQUE u/s 138 .HE HAS 3 POSTAL ADDRESSES
1.MAHARAJA
2.VAVA TEXTILES
3.MAMAS
HE HAS ISSUED ME A CHEQUE FROM MAMAS AND AGAINST THE BILL WHICH IS IN NAME OF MAMAS BUT I HAVE SEND THE NOTICE IN VAVA BY UPC AND IN MAHARAJA BY REGISTERED POST.THE REGISTERED POST HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED BY HIM REASON REFUSED .WHILE I HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT THE NOTICE SEND THROUGH UPC .I ALSO DONT KNOW WHETHER HE IS THE PARTNER OR PROPRIETOR IN THE 2 FIRMS i.e VAVA AND MAHARAJA. BUT HE HAS SOME CONNECTION WITH THE SAME .I WANT TO KNOW WHETHER IF HE CAN SAY THAT HE HAS NOT RECEIVED THE NOTICE INSPITE IF HE IS A PARTNER OR PROPRIETOR IN VAVA TEXTILES OR MAHARAJA .ALSO CAN I SEND HIM ANOTHER NOTICE IN MAMAS AND WHAT IS THE TIME PERIOD TO FILE THE OTHER NOTICE .ALSO LET ME KNOW IF WE CAN FIGHT FOR THAT HE HAS RECEIVED THE NOTICE .
THANKING YOU .

Enforceblement of a decree, which crosses more than 12 years

138

*****case no2 :for the same cheque
138 filed for cheque bouncing case by complainant mr x for Rs 3500000/-against the four accuesed given below
he had his bankers cheque bounce receipt which mentioned

1) payment stopped by the drawer
2) Drawers signature incomplete/requires

accused no1: Is the co

accused no2: partner of accused no1
and brother of compainant mr x
(also ex partner of the
accused no1)

accused no3: parner of accused no1 and son
of accused no2

Accused no4: partner of accused no1 and
son of accused no2


*****case no1 :for the same cheque
filled 1st before the 138

As soon as cheque bounced before the action of complainant the accused no 3 file a complaint in the court for forgery of cheque under sec 156(3)against the Mr x which had a duplicate rubber stamp of co and was a 10yrs old stolen blank cheque of the co certified by the bankers of accused no1 that it was a 10yrs old cheque
order was passed against mr x was arrested on cheating and forgery charge. case was going to start cheque was with the I.O. send to the forensic expert

present status:
****case no 1: mr x expired and the case is also finish since the accused is no more

****case no 2: original complainant mr x expired and the case is run by substitute mr y his son
cheque is with the I.O
and application had been filed by Mr y to start the case with secondary evidence xerox of the cheque since I.O. is not sending the cheque to the 138court inspite of several reminder of the court

judgement has to come

please advice
i am accused no 3
i say that this is a false 138case it was a ten yrs old cheque which had been certified by our bankers and it bears false rubber stamp. the cheque had the signature of my father accused no 2 who is also expired
we two brother and partner accused no 3 and 4 had not issued any cheque nor my father and the cheque does not bear our signature


the details of the case is also given below please give advice how do i get out of this false 138 case

138

*****case no2 :for the same cheque
138 filed for cheque bouncing case by complainant mr x for Rs 3500000/-against the four accuesed given below
he had his bankers cheque bounce receipt which mentioned

1) payment stopped by the drawer
2) Drawers signature incomplete/requires

accused no1: Is the co

accused no2: partner of accused no1
and brother of compainant mr x
(also ex partner of the
accused no1)

accused no3: parner of accused no1 and son
of accused no2

Accused no4: partner of accused no1 and
son of accused no2


*****case no1 :for the same cheque
filled 1st before the 138

As soon as cheque bounced before the action of complainant the accused no 3 file a complaint in the court for forgery of cheque under sec 156(3)against the Mr x which had a duplicate rubber stamp of co and was a 10yrs old stolen blank cheque of the co certified by the bankers of accused no1 that it was a 10yrs old cheque
order was passed against mr x was arrested on cheating and forgery charge. case was going to start cheque was with the I.O. send to the forensic expert

present status:
****case no 1: mr x expired and the case is also finish since the accused is no more

****case no 2: original complainant mr x expired and the case is run by substitute mr y his son
cheque is with the I.O
and application had been filed by Mr y to start the case with secondary evidence xerox of the cheque since I.O. is not sending the cheque to the 138court inspite of several reminder of the court

judgement has to come

please advice
i am accused no 3
i say that this is a false 138case it was a ten yrs old cheque which had been certified by our bankers and it bears false rubber stamp. the cheque had the signature of my father accused no 2 who is also expired
we two brother and partner accused no 3 and 4 had not issued any cheque nor my father and the cheque does not bear our signature


the details of the case is also given below please give advice how do i get out of this cheque