sadananda netha gone
04 May 2010 at 12:29
Dear Sir,
facts of the Query
my borther running stock broking firm in his town, it is registered partner ship firm, he was not a managing partner of the firm, one of client opened trading account with main broker, client incured losses, client will fully filed a criminal case sec.420 of ipc by cheating, after some time
client with draw case in lok adalth, case was closed, after 1 year again he send a legal notice through advocate to my borther same cause , what steps take my brother against such person kindly give your value able suggestion on this quiery
yours faithfully,
sadananda netha gone
Anonymous
04 May 2010 at 12:27
This query is for my friend Ramesh(only son).
He stays in an independant house with his mother. His father has passed away 2 years ago without leaving any will/succession certifcate. The House property(Ind House that they are staying) is in the name of deceased father without any nomination.
Now my question is
1. Who will be the legal heir of the property . Wife (100%) or wife and son 50% each?
2. Also how will they be able to sell this property since its owned by his father and he is no more there?
Please advice
H.Vijayakumar
04 May 2010 at 12:11
Dear sir,
This has reference to the Dishonour of electronic funds transfer for insufficiency, can we file a complaint in the criminal court or what are the remedies for the same.
Thanking you
Yours faithfully
H.VIJAYAKUMAR
Ajay Gehi
04 May 2010 at 12:07
Dear Sir
Facts:
An ownership building built on leasehold land(lease 99 years)
Remaining Lease 45 years
Court Case: since past ten years filed by owner of land for recovery of Lease.
Query
1) Is it advisable to purchase flat in the said building?
2) Can the owner of Land refuse to renew the lease at the end of the term of 99 years and vacate the residents who own the flats?
Will await your valuable response at gehiajay@gmail.com
Many Thanks and Regards
Ajay Gehi
Anonymous
04 May 2010 at 10:34
I want to evict the shop which is let out for more than 35 yrs.on bonafide need under delhi rent control under section 14 (1) e. The property stands in my mother's name, who is a widow.
Kindly advise whether the section written above is correct or it should be in section 14(i)d, since it is a commercial shop.
Kindly also advise regarding the eviction, whether easily decided with time period limit.-
A.P.SHARMA- (Mobile)9810412986
Anonymous
04 May 2010 at 09:55
Respected Sir,
On 30.04.2010 I had submitted my resiganisation from the Post of Sr.Accountant, but after that I yet not received any response from my office, I send it through my mail to Gm Accounts, Gm H.R. & director of my company
Pls advice me that should I do in this situation
Seshagiri Viswanatha Rao
04 May 2010 at 09:08
In case an adultry and bigamy case is established in respect of wife against her husband is the illegitimate child has any claim of property
Anonymous
04 May 2010 at 03:29
Sir,
am sameer from Hyderabad i have a one problem
let me share with you my daughter got divorce in 2006 due to Dowry harassment reason.
she have a 6year old son she taken a divorce from as per Muslim religion rule(Quazi) after divorce my My daughter's son is living with her past 5 years,
she got a second marriage, now she is very happy with her husband finally a small kid got step father.
just imagine in future his own's father have right to take a kid?
a small kid can't live without his mother In this situation what i can do? give me suggestion plz
Anonymous
03 May 2010 at 23:11
Respected experts,
In recital portion of a sale deed it is written that if original sale deed document will go at the hand of vendee and remain with him will be proof of consideration amount received/paid. But the original deed document never given to vendee and remained with vendor and vendee never came into possession. After few yrs vendor died. After a gap of 60 yrs heirs of the vendee obtained the certified copy of the sale deed. On the basis of that they are claiming the land (which is vacant) rather has filed a title suit. Will they have to explain the where about of original sale deed? If they do not show the original sale deed will it be considered void?
Thanks and regds.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 n.i act ( accused is trying to be over smart)
Respected Sir,
i run an advertising agency. last year from april to november i released almost 19-20 advertisements of my client (pvt ltd company) in various newspapers. against which i took 95 days credit cheques against each advertisements.Client continuously asked me in written and verbally not to deposit the cheques and gave me excuses that they have not got required response from the ads and they are short of money now etc. As a client we gave them some time but one day they emailed us and said to deposit the cheques for some amount out of the total amount on after 20 days and also said that if possibble they might clear some more amount against the due cheques but the thing was that they additionally said that if they will not be able to fulfill their commitment then they will pay us 18 percent intrest. initially i agreed and confirmed them to do that. but on the very nexy day they verbally said to us they their email is no commitment and it is just sent to us for our satisfaction then i immediately emailed them confirming that i have lot of pressure from newspapers to whom i have to make the payment and i can not stop your cheques and additionally wrote that as per our discussion i am going to deposit the cheques so make sure that there is enough balance in your account. Here one point is very important that as asked by the client, i deposited some of the cheques on the date on which client wanted us to deposit but unfoetunately apart from one cheques, all the cheques were bounced due to insufficient of funds. after the bouncing of cheques worth rs. 1.60 crores i gave my client a notices for which they did not care to answer then the we filed 7 cases of cheques bouncing under 138 n.i act in hon'ble court. Time passed by and court issued 2 summons 1 bw and 1 nbw to M.D of the company who's signature was there on the cheques. On the next day of the date of NBW client silently appered in the court but fortunately we got the information and we also appered in the court. Well now client has got the bail but in their bail application they have said that the client issued the cheques as security but we deposited the cheques and filed the case against them so 138 n.i act can not be forced against them. Next date of case is 18 th april,10. Sir we and client both know what the facts are but client is trying to twist the case. we have got work orders of the client/ emails of the client requesting us to delay the cheques and giving us excuses and no where term Security cheques has come but only term PDC is used by us and they have accordingly answered us.
My question is what should be my strategy now in this case as client is trying to be smart with us and trying to delay the proceedings and get out of the 138 n.i act? What should be my prepration/ points on the next date..also let me know what are security cheques and why they are trying to proove the pdc's as security cheques?
Sir, to proove my claim i have got correspondence between me and the client through emails where time to time client is requesting me to hold the cheques or telling me when to present the cheques. otherwise also in my emails i have always used the term pdc (post dated cheques) and accordingly client has replied.
apart from it client also wrote a signed letter to me which he sent through attachment of email in which he gave me details of the cheques with their respective dates and amount and gave me fresh deposition dates...moreover they issued me pdc's against each ad and for the exact cost of the ad (example : ch.3838383 dt 12.12.12 for rs. 123456.00) in many of their work orders also they have wrote a language '' payment of this advertisment is being done by chno. 112222 dt.12.12.12 for 123456.00 (cheque date used to be of after 95 days like their other cheques).
SO WHAT TO SAY EXPERTS....?