Anonymous
03 April 2019 at 21:09
Dear Experts and Lawyer Gentlemen,
I am Purnaiah, Chartered Accountant from Hyderabad request your expert advice on the following issue:
One of my uncle along with three of his friends purchased some agricultural land in one of the prominent area in Hyderabad in Apr 1988. At that point in time, since official survey and demarcation of the said land could not be completed the vendor showed all Five Sy Nos. 11, 12,13,14 & 15 as pertaining to the said land in the schedule of the property referred in the sale deed.
Subsequently, post completion of the official survey; demarcation and fixation of boundaries duly separating the land sold to us from other part of the vendor’s land, it was identified and confirmed that the entire land sold to us was situated in Sy No. 11 only but not in other Sy Nos. as noted in the above principal sale deed executed in Apr 1988. To rectify this, in February 1989, they have mutually executed a rectification deed by removing the redundant Sy Numbers mentioned in the principal sale deed.
In the due course, partners took several years to develop the land and convert it in to residential plots under HUDA norms. Meanwhile, when the development was in progress one of the partner has expired leaving Four (4) of his dependents (Wife, Son & Two daughters) as his legal heirs. One of his legal heirs (deceased partner’s elder daughter) was living in USA along with her husband.
Later, in June 2014 all the Partners (including Four legal heirs of the deceased partner including his elder daughter who was in India at that time) have mutually executed a partition deed and shared the plots among them.
Issue: Here the real problem cropped up, to our surprise we found that the details of the subsequent rectification deed (of Feb 1989) were not captured in the recent Partition Deed executed in June 2014. Now, being a legal heir and a party to the Partition deed, deceased Partner’s elder daughter held up in USA and she is not turning up to India for executing a rectification deed to this effect. Her other three family members who are in Hyderabad also neither supporting us in this regard nor trying to get her to Hyderabad for executing the rectification deed. Because of one legal heir of the deceased partner (who is in USA), the entire process is held up and other partners are completely tied up. They are not in a position to enjoy their share of property as they can’t get any bank loans for further development nor in a position to register the plots in the name of their kin and kith. Due to this pending rectification, other partners are completely refrained from doing further activities in the property.
Request: Please help us with suitable remedies to overcome this peculiar problem.
Warm Regards,
CA Purnaiah
Ploraj Mosahary
03 April 2019 at 20:12
Dear Sir,
I am Ploraj Mosahary, a contractual employee of a Govt Project has been engaged in election duty for the forthcoming Lok Sabha Election,2019 at IT cell that last for more than a month. May I know if a contractual employee under a Mission mode project can be engaged in an election duty ? I am working under National Rural Livelihoods Mission, a central Govt. sponsored scheme as District Project Manager in the state of Assam. As I am responsible for implementation of the whole project in the district it is becoming very difficult to perform my election duty. The project being in a Mission mode and all target based, I have to do all my tasks without any excuse. I have to travel to filed areas to complete my tasks, attend meetings, workshops outstation and do reporting to my State Mission Director almost on a daily basis. Moreover, our contract is done only for a year and renewed every year based on our performance. Please suggest
LAWYER ASSOCIATES
03 April 2019 at 17:29
our client want to purchase property of a deceased person, one of the legal heir is minor, so how can minor sell his share of property.
Member (Account Deleted)
03 April 2019 at 17:18
Hi I want an expert to check and correct me in writing a letter to the Chief Justice of Bombay HC.
My format is as below please read it and if any corrections please advice asap.
Thanks in advance.
FORMAT:
From: Pradeep Dattatray Bhaigade
Address: ABCDEF
Cell No: 00000000
Date:
To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of Bombay High Court,
Your Honor,
SUBJECT: The purpose of this letter is to save the precious time of the Hon’ble High Court regarding WP No 2257/2018 (Reg No 103/2019)
I am Pradeep Dattatray Bhaigade, 44 years old is the Respondent No. 6 in WP 2123/2018, 2209/2018 and 2223/2018.
WP (L) no 2123/2018 filed by Advocate H. S. Anand on behalf of Rajendra Vishwakarma and Others is clubbed with WP (L) no 2209/2018 and WP (L) no 2223/2018 heard by Hon’ble Justice G. S. Kulkarni.
The above Writ Petitions were on board of the Hon’ble High Court on on 13 December 2018 where I was present in person as Respondent No. 6 and the matter is CLOSED FOR ORDER as per the Lordship’s directions.
Just want to add that the Applicant and his advocate H S Anand wants to delay the evictions orders passed by the Competent Authority of SRA. They are very much successful in doing so because although there is no relief grant by the Hon’ble High Court the SRA is not willing to execute the eviction order passed by the Dy. Collector, Competent Authority on 27th July 2015.
To continue such kind of delay and enjoying the illegal possession of Rehab Building rooms Applicant Gaurav Shetty through Advocate H S Anand have filed one more WP (L) no 2257/2018 for the same SRA rehab tenement and same society. Gaurav Shetty’s previous WP (L) No was 2209/2018 (Reg No is WP 3131/2018).
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied, we heard in news and magazines to avoid more delay and save the precious time of the Hon’ble High Court We write this letter to the Hon’ble Chief Justice Sir and request My Lordship tokindly look into the matter on priority basis because illegal occupants are having the possession of 5 rooms since 2007 till date.
Hon’ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni already heard same 3 writ petitions (Closed for Order) and hope will be issuing an order of the same sooner or later.
We like to request The Hon’ble Chief Justice of Bombay High Court to allot the WP (L) No 2257/2018 (Reg No. WP 103/2019) to The Justice G. S. Kulkarni as he already handled three Writ Petitions of the same society, same advocate and the same SRA Scheme it will definitely save the precious time of the Hon’ble High Court.
WP (L) No 2257/2018 (Reg No. WP 103/2019) is now alloted to The Justice S. C. GUPTE sir but no hearing takes place till today 4th March 2019.
Chandrika Subramaniyan
03 April 2019 at 16:41
Bachelor brother died intestate. Survived by Mother 90 yrs age and spinister sister 63 yrs. Can sister claim legal heirship for claims of property ? Mother already owns a property. Sister does not. Thanks This is Chennai
Anonymous
03 April 2019 at 16:39
wife moves out of husband home due to some reason and wants to take back her belongings. Wife has house keys but husband doesn't allow to take her belongings and other stuffs, husband changes the lock too. What she should do?
A.V. Subramanyam
03 April 2019 at 15:36
Present status of the high court order dated 18.7.2015 suspending the GO of the Telangana government which says that the address given at the time of joining the defence is the criteria for CAP certificate for engineering courses.
Anonymous
03 April 2019 at 14:28
Bachelor brother died intestate. Survived by Mother 90 yrs age and spinister sister 63 yrs. Can sister claim legal heirship for claims of property ? Mother already owns a property. Sister does not. Thanks This is Chennai
Srinivasa
03 April 2019 at 14:18
My name is shyam, resident of telangana in Nalgonda district,in our family consist of Me(Shyam sunder) and younger brother Ram and lastly my sister,my father expired in the year of 2010 april, after that my sister got married june 2011, with inter caste marriage,as on date of expired on my father name agriculture land 17 acres, out of that 13 acres are inherited property from my grandfather and 4 acres are acquired my father from his earnings and as an date of expired , my mother name also having 6 acres agriculture land in my mother, total 23 acres land both my father and mother, total my father name agriculture land showing transferred in revenue records also to my name and brother name in the year 2011, at that time of my sister age was 20, now whether she is eligible to claim legal rights of our father land which was mutated to my name and brother name, and also any legal rights she can be claimed my mother land, still as on date my mother name land showing as per revenue records are 5acres, request you to guide what are the action needs to be taken my self and my mother and brother on my sister, simultaneously what type of legal rights she can claim on my family.
Regards.
shyam
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Registration charges to register a court judgment / decree
A fraudulent person filed a civil suit seeking partition on a property excluding the genuine legal heirs of the property who are in possession and occupation of the property. The genuine legal heirs when they came to know about the suit, impleaded themselves in the suit and in the end the suit got dismissed, favouring the impleaded respondents. i.e. genuine legal heirs. Nw, when the legal heirs took the judgment and decree with the Registration department for registering the same, the registration official demands Registration charges on the cost of the suit property as mentioned in the decree.
In my opinion, the charges demanded by the Registration officials for registering the judgment/decree not correct for the following reasons that the document that is getting registered is a court judgment/decree which simply rejects the plaintiff’s request seeking partition and there is no question of transfer of property or declaration of title.
I humbly request the learned lawyers to offer their valuable advice/suggestion and quote the citation if there is any in this regard.
Thanks & Regards
Balaji