N.K.Assumi
08 March 2009 at 05:38
Dear Members,
Consider this.Bail can be moved even on holiday like sunday etc. For a Christian sunday is a very solemn and pious day. Now if an accused approach a magistrate for bail in his residence on sunday, can the Magistrate says that "Its Sunday and I dont work on Sunday" Come on monday. Is it proper?
monica
07 March 2009 at 23:54
In which act/law is it explicitly stated that direct adoption between birth parents and adoptive parents is allowed?
Or on the reverse side, is there an act/law that explicitly states that direct adoption between birth parents and adoptive parents is illegal?
CARA's website lists direct adoption as a "don't" but it is not explicit in stating that adoption directly from birth parents is illegal while it does explicitly state that adopting directly from hospitals is illegal.
A few days ago I contacted CARA to try to understand this. I have yet to hear back from CARA so your input is appreciated.
sanjay singh thakur
07 March 2009 at 22:43
Dear All
Please provide me valuable information as to whether such Title Deed whose Title Holder is not alive can be given for Equitable Mortgage by making all the legal heirs as Guarantors to the bank or not and secondly whether there is any provision in law for the same.
Regards.
sanjay singh thakur
07 March 2009 at 22:43
Dear All
Please provide me valuable information as to whether such Title Deed whose Title Holder is not alive can be given for Equitable Mortgage by making all the legal heirs as Guarantors to the bank or not and secondly whether there is any provision in law for the same.
H. Mujtaba
07 March 2009 at 22:26
Dear Sirs,
Thank you very much for the reply. May I request you to kindly provide me the case law that an application under Order I Rule 10 read with section 151 of C.P.C., is maintainable to bring on record the legal representatives of the defendants who have died prior to the institution of the suit.
Thanks and warm regards,
Mujtaba
T.V.Ramana Rao
07 March 2009 at 21:36
My friend is working in a private polytechnic. He reports that willfully i.e., the admissions are full, his employer delaying the payment of monthly salaries by 10 to 15 days every month. i.e., he is sending his salaries to bank accounts every month on 15th instead of 1st. Whether his action legally valid? if not whom to approach before approaching the court of law?
allurisivajiraju
07 March 2009 at 20:51
Respected Seniors,
Mr. 'X' Purchased a flat from 'Y' who is a builder of a apartment. Total flat owners are 30. But there are only 17 car parking places available. But Mr 'Y' builder already collected Rs. 25,000-00 from all the 30 members towards car parking area.
While purchasing flats Mr. 'Y'issued a brocher which shows all the specifications to be provided to all flat owners. In the specifications clearly mentioned that all the flat owners are having car parking area.
Recently Mr. 'Y' provided car parking area to the 17 flat owners in the absence of 13 members including Mr. 'X'.
Then the said 13 members questioned Mr. 'Y' about car parking area. Mr. 'Y' replied that i will provide car parking area by constructing a shed in the road side margin which was adjacent to the apartment. But the said proposal was opposed by the 17 members who are already obtained car parking area. In fact it is very difficult to live in the said flat with car arking area.
In the above circumstances what is the remedy to Mr. 'X'. whether he approach civil court for specific performance of contranct or he approch consumer court for obtaining damages for his mental strain.
Thanking you in advance.
mahesh verma
07 March 2009 at 20:01
i filed one case of negotableinstrucment
for recovery of amount due to dishonour of chque. the trial court issued summon to the accused and fixed a date for his statement. on the hearing date i could not attned the court as well as my lawyer could not attend the court. the trial court dismissd the case under section 256 of cr.p.c. I filed a case before session court for revision of the case but the session court also dismissed the case under section401 , 256 (1), 378 (3)( 5 )
401 (5)
please advise me now, what step could i take to prosecute the accused under negotiable instrument act 1881
mahesh verma
07 March 2009 at 19:59
i filed on case of negotableinstrucment
for recovery of amount due to dishonour of chque. the trial court issued summon to the accused and fixed a date for his statement. on the hearing date i could not attned the court as well as my lawyer could not attend the court. the trial court dismissd the case under section 256 of cr.p.c. I filed a case before session court for revision of the case but the session court also dismissed the case under section401 , 256 (1), 378 (30 ( 5 )
401 (5)
please advise me now, what step could i take to prosecute the accused under negotiable instrument act 1881
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Prosecution under section 174 of the IPC against woman?
If a woman refused to appear before the police station in a summon under section 160 of the CrPc, can she be prosecuted under section 174 of the IPC?