BHOOP SINGH
28 March 2009 at 16:16
Dear Experts
We have made a criminal complained against Mr. Madan Lal & his three maternal uncles (MAMAs) on 16th Dec 1998. They were all charged U/s 323,324 & 325. In that case myself, my brother and my father got injuries. Case was under trialed in the Hon'able Lower Court, Kosli Distt. Rewari (Haryana) after 10 year a decision was came that accused charged for one and half year prision with Rs. 300 fine each. But accused appealed in the Hon,able Higher Court i.e. District & Session Court Rewari. After 2 year Hon,able court made some amendment in the decision i.e. that was a family dispute and accused realsed on Probation of 2 year and awarded a compensation of Rs. 15000 to us. But we were not satisfied with Hon,able Session Court decision and Refused to take the compensation. We made an appeal against the decision in Hon,able Punjacb & Haryana High Court in Dec 2008. But Hon,able high court dismissed our appeal on family dispute and long time of case. So you are requested please clarify that
1. Court can dismiss the appeal on said groud. Becouse Mr. Madan Lal is Our Cousin and his MAMA were came outside with and in the case my brother's left hand was broken and my self and my father got head injuries.
2. If court dismiss the appeal than we have another option for re-appealing.
3. If we can not re-appeal than our compensation Rs. 15000 claimed or not.
Thanks
Bhoop Singh
Ashwin Jain
28 March 2009 at 15:15
Hi!
I want to know the procedure for changing my signature from my current one.
i also want to know what if my all the other documents like PAN etc.. bearing current signature?
please reply
Pawan Mittal
28 March 2009 at 14:52
ONE OF MY CLIENT TO AVOID LITIGATION EXECUTED THE DIVORCE DEED WITH MUTUAL CONSENT.
1. I WANT TO KNOW THE VALIDITY OF THIS DEED IN THE COURT OF LAW.
2.IS IT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN DECREE FROM THE COURT.
3.CAN ANY PERSON GET DECREE ON THE BASIS OF THIS DEED EASILY.
3. CAN THEY GO FOR MARRIAGE WITH OTHER PERSON ON THE BASIS OF THIS DEED, IF YES - THE VALIDITY OF THE THAT MARRIAGE.
sushil tagaliya
28 March 2009 at 12:48
Respect sir,
I want to know legle provision against a person of upper cast abuse my cast
seshachala
28 March 2009 at 12:45
SIR PLEASE TELL US ABOUT APPLCABLITY OF EMPLOYEE STATE INSURANCE ACT (ESIC ACT) TO THE TRASPORT PROVIDER OF THE FOLLOWING POINTS
1. THE COMPANY IS COVERED UNDER ESIC AND HAVING AGREEMENT WITH THE TRANSPORT PROVIDER FOR THE COMMUTATION OF ITS EMPLOYEES
2. THE TRANSPORT PROVIDER IS ALSO COVERED UNDER THE ESIC.
3. THE TRANSPOST PROVIDER HAS SUBCONTRACTED (HEIRED) SINGLE VEHICLE OWNER FROM PUBLIC FOR THE ABOVE PURPOSE.
4. THE COMPANY IS PAYING FOR THE ABOVE SERVICE ON KILOMETER BASIS INCLUDING SERVICE TAX AND AFTER TDS DEDUCTIONS
5. THE TRASPORT PROVIDER IS PAYING ABOVE Rs.10000/- ON AN AVERAGE TO SINGLE VEHICLE OWNERS AND CONTENDING THAT ESIC IS NOT APPLICABLE ON THOSE PEOPLE
PLEASE CLARIFY THE ABOVE MATTER
Chetan
28 March 2009 at 07:55
In a case before me-- I am on Accused side
The complainant file 3 different complaints u/s 138, whereas the transac tion is same , but only the accused give him 3 cheques.
The case at Evidence stage (Cross of Complainant)
Whether the cross of one case is to be taken in another 2 cases ? pls provide with provisions
vinod bansal
27 March 2009 at 21:29
Dear All
In a crl complaint i had exhibited a CD in the preliminary evidence of complainant who recorded this,now case is fixed for arguments/consideration on summoning (whether accused may be summoned or not it has to be decided now by the cour)how i can draw the attention of the court towards the contents of the CD i.e. how can i can play/show CD before court at this stage.plz help
sarfaraz
27 March 2009 at 15:14
Good evening sir,,
i am the proprietor of a firm induldged in taking Ministry Of Defence Contracts(Annual) all over India.I am having 3 Nos. office in three different states..1.ORISSA(Balasore city)
2.ANDHRA PRADESH(Vishakapatnam).3.MAHARASHTRA(Pune city)..Now sir I am registered initially under EPF in the state of Orissa..Now sir I have got a contract in Vishakapatnam,a state different from Orissa state..Now my Q's is:-
1.Will my single registration of EPF in Orissa can be useful for my Local Employees working in Visakhapatnam???
2. Do I have to register again and again of EPF in every state wherever I take up new contract in the same company name????
3. As a single Firm, cant I employ every my employee though they are working in different states under a single EPF registration in Orissa??As this can save lots of my money in getting registered in every states wherever I take up new work..
Please reply me Sir immediately as its on a very urgent basis..
Thanking You.
M/s. Archana Enterprises
Prop :- Mr.Sarfaraz Ahmed.
Call :- 09371580781
Adv. Mohan Chandra
27 March 2009 at 14:53
The complainant is a multinational bank and I am an accused in the case u/s 138, 142 and compensation u/s 357(3). The said case will be shortly completing 4 years. The complainant representative are regularly absent during the proceedings and have been severly reprimanded by various Magistrates on many occassions but on two earlier occassions when the Magistrate were about to dismiss the case they were transfered as per routine.
During the last four hearings the complainant was absent again on the second last hearing the complainant was penalised 1000 and given a last warning and on the last hearing as the complainant witness was absent again for cross examination the cross examination has been closed by the Magistrate.
Now I would like to seek your guidance on how to proceed further.
Should I submit an application for dissmissal of the case, if so what is the procedure. In the last cross the complainant has first denied demanding blank cheques, but later agreed that blank cheques without amount and date were accepted at the time of opening the account.
Kindly note that I am pursuing this matter on my own for the last one year.
Thanking you in anticipation.
Comments Added on 28/12/2009
Sir,
Thank you for your guidance.
Magistrate has already closed the cross examination and informed the complainants advocate that the "matter would proceed further for necessary action" on next date. In view of this what is the nature of necessary action I can expect.
While in the Affidavit the complainaint has mentioned that the accused made the payment in settlement of Rs.xyz on 25/05/05 subsequently in the last cross examination the complainant witness has accepted that blank cheques were accepted prior to opening the account in June 2002 and has since failed to appear for further cross examination.
Under the above circumstances now I cannot proceed further to prove that I had no liabilities at the time of issuing the cheque infact even later.
I would very much appreciate if you will kindly guide.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Abuse to my cast
Respected Sir,
I also want to know whether i can lodge FIR against a person of upper cast in Haryana (i belongs to Mali cast) under SC/ST Act. because he abuse my cast