Ravinder reddy K
10 April 2009 at 11:04
Dear members,
we have ancestrsal prpoerty which inherited for my forefathers (i.e from my fathers' Grandfather). My grand father has 2 sons and 4 daughters.
My queries:
1).My grand father made a will on the name of his two sons and his younger daughter(at the time Unmarried). Is the will made by him is valid?.
2). He made a gift registration of some property on the name of his 3rd daughter without any the consent of his rest of the Children(All are major). Is it valid?.
HENCE i AM REQUESTING YOU TO PROVIDE ME YOUR VALUABLE SUGGESTIONS ON THE SAME.
Rama Verma
10 April 2009 at 10:02
PLEASE PROVIDE IN WHICH SECTION OF CONTRACT ACT ANTICIPOTORY BREACH OF CONTARCT CAN BE FOUND AND IS THERE ANY JUGDEMENT ON THIS ISSUSE.
V.V.RAMDAS
09 April 2009 at 23:34
Sir/Madad
Please do provide upto date case law of SC in connection with Accident case Law.If the accused driver is charge sheeted u/s 181 M.V Act for not haveing a driviling licence at the time of accident. Whether the insurance comany is liable for payment of Compensation amount/awarded amount. Should the compay 1st pay and get it recovered from the owner? Reply urgent.
Shyam Ji Srivastava
09 April 2009 at 21:56
Dear Members,
Can we get order for attachment under section 9 of the Arbitration Act.? Early reply is highly appreciated.
SHYAM JI SRIVASTAVA
Advocate
Kanpur U.P.
Ranganath
09 April 2009 at 21:46
Ld counsels,
What should be mentioned in the FIR when there was a related complaint filed by the father of the complainant and the same was withdrawn.
Can this be called first information. There is a one month gap between the first complaint that was withdrawn and the second one.
Also kindly clarify if I need the certified copies of the first complaint and statement that was withdrawn for filing quash petion on the second complaint/FIR. There are contradiction between the first complaint and the second compliant in the allegations.
Please clarify. Thanks.
Ranganath
09 April 2009 at 21:25
Ld Counsels,
Can we refer past judgements of SC or HC while filing for a Quash petition. Or is it that citation are reffered only at the time of hearing/arguments.
Please clarify. Thanks.
S.N.Derashri
09 April 2009 at 21:18
Please qoute some latest authorities from Supreme court as well as any of the High Court holding a compulsory retirement pending DE is illegal and void ab initio.
S.N.Derashri
Somnath mukherjee
09 April 2009 at 19:32
My wife filed a case u/s498a,313,506,34 I.P.C against me and my family in kalyan court u/s 156(3) on 22-2-2007 and case was subsiquently rejected by the Ld.C.J.M on the grund of jurisdiction.After some days my mother-in-law files another case u/s498a323,326,328,313,315,148,457,147,427504,506,120B I.P.C against me by colouring the same cause of action and upon the same court by supressing the previous one.Whether this case is tenable? Whether i can file quashing? Which one is better for me? Please suggest some relevent case laws.
Niranjan V
09 April 2009 at 17:48
Hi All,
We had signed a service contract with X communication company for calling their customers. We dialed for 2 months and our first payment was received in 4 th month. Again we dialed for another 2 months total of 6 moths and when we asked for payment they started complaining about the quality of service. They stopped providing calling database without any written or oral communication. When we asked for calling database and payment they replied orally 'we have stopped the service'. This put us in huge loss and we approached lok adalat for settlement for our damages and loss. Lok adalat dismissed the case after several hearings for almost 8 months. They should have rejected in the initial stage or first month itself and passed the order case is not maintainable in this court.
Later we approached high court by applying writ petition which was dismissed after 1 month without looking into the issue. We thought they might have overlooked and we applied writ appeal which is also dismissed after pending for almost 5 months.
Now we don't know what to do next for claiming our money. So request any expert to advise us for next course of action.
Thanks - Niranjan
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
illegal bandh called by political party
the high court mumbai imposed penalty on the shiv sena and bhartiya janta party for calling illegal bandh in mumbai in 2004. I could not find the judgment and date of judgment. Please help me if you have the judgement and date of judgement, convey it to me