ankur
19 June 2011 at 17:11
can a non SC/ST buy land from an SC/ST person in dehradun under KUZA?
Hitesh Rughani
19 June 2011 at 15:50
We are planning to develop a land situated in Palanpur Municipal Corporation limit, Gujarat. The land bears New Condition and Agriculture.
We want to convert the land into Old Condition and Non-Agriculture and execute the development agreement with the Owners.
Please advise us the sequential procedure and rate of stamp duty. Can we execute the Development Agreement first ? or after converting the land into Non Agriculture ? Thanks and Regards.
Hitesh Rughani
DYANCHANDRARAO L. KOMARA
19 June 2011 at 12:13
RESPECTED SIR/ MADAM,
I DYANCHANDRARAO L. KOMARA IS IN NEED OF FOLLOWING APPLICATION FORMS AS I RESIDE IN SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND SO PLEASE TELL ME WHERE AND HOW TO GET THESE FOLLOWING APPLICATION.
1) APPLICATION FORM FOR SENIOR CITIZEN IDENTITY CARD.
2) APPLICATION FORM FOR HANDICAPPED PERSON IDENTITY CARD.
3) APPLICATION FORM FOR UNEMPLOYED IDENTITY CARD.
4) APPLICATION FORM FOR VOTERS IDENTITY CARD.
PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE ME WITH BRIEF DETAIL AS TO WHICH PROOF OF DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE PROVIDED.
THANKING YOU.
YOURS TRULY,
DYANCHANDRARAO L. KOMARA.
COMMERCE STUDENT.
Anonymous
18 June 2011 at 23:49
sir,
My grandmother who was a widow migrated from East Pakistan now Bangladesh, alongwith minor children. After spending more than 27 years in Delhi, a plot of 233 Sq. yards was allotted to one of her sons by Govt. of India, Punarvas Vibhag in lieu of property in Bangladesh. Now, shall this property devolve amongst all the children including my grandmother as it was allotted in lieu of compensation claimed for the property left in East Pakistan.
Secondly, whether there was a provision of allotment of one plot to one migrated family or each member was entitled to claim separate plot from the Govt. of India or whether Govt. of India had given seperate plot to each migrated member seperately?
Thirdly, whether the property papers of Bangladesh property which was in the name of my grandfather, could be used by each family member for allotment of different plot by Govt. of India? Is this no duping the Govt.?
Fourthly, can the rights of any member who has not yet claimed on such property, be time barred? Can he claim his rights on such a property which is in lieu of ancestral property?
Fifth, what would be the course of action if one of the shareholders wants to probate a laminate will on a plain white paper unilaterally?
Rajesh
18 June 2011 at 22:40
in current citation of m.p.high court,gwalior banch
Aarav jain
18 June 2011 at 22:24
sir where i m doing my bussiness(tailoring work-have commercial electricity meter) is area is develop by one builder.....when MHADA person came on survey i was not at place and they had noted my room as non resident(commercial)...but in actually earlier it was used for resident purpose only....past two year i m doing tailoring work there so converted electricity meter into commercial...bt in municipal records its residential place...so builder saying ki u will get shop...i said i want flat same as other are getting at residential place...so please tell me sir what can i do??
kapil kothari
18 June 2011 at 19:59
Dear Sir
According to Bar council a student having degree from distance university not eligible for LLB. I am BCA from IGNOU and M.Sc. from JRNRV udaipur it is a regular degree.Kindly guide me can i apply for LLB.
Anonymous
18 June 2011 at 14:20
OUR BLDG. ENTERED INTO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH DEVELOPER IN THE YEAR 2005.MANY MEMBERS FELT THAT THE MG.COMMITTE COMMITED FRAUD. BUT TILL DATE THEY HAVE NOT CHALLENGED THE AGREEMENT NOR CONSENT GIVEN BY MAJORITY MEMBERS. FEW MEMBERS HAVE LEFT THE SOCIETY BY ACCEPTING MONETARY COMPENSATION. FEW MEMBERS REGISTRERED INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER.AT PRESENT OUR SOCIETY IS NOT FUNCTIONING. THERE IS NO MG.COMMITTEE. FEW MORE MEMBERS ARE WILING TO GO WITH DEVELOPER BY SIGINING THE AGREEMENT AND REGISTEREING . IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCES CAN THE MEMBERS DIRECTLY ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER BYE PARTITE. NORMALLY FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MUST HAVE TRIPARTITE AGREEEMENT. ARE THERE ANY CASE LWS PERTAINING TO THIS EFFECT.
Sanjeev Duliea
18 June 2011 at 12:33
Dear All Seniors,
I am working in a Construction Company in HR Deptt. The Company is dealing in road projects. In one of our road project there is a problem, We have HM (Hot Mix) and WMM Plant shifted in our project office area and we are producing the DBM and WMM by this plant for the making the road. Total manpower of these plants is almost 60 employees. Now the problem is that the factory inspector and labour officer forcing us for taking the license under The factory act but we have already a license under the Building & Other Construction Act. One of my senior told me that there is a provision in Factory Act. that if HM Plant And WMM Plant shifted in the project area than there is no need to take the license under the factory act he also told me that we are producing the material for use in our road project not for selling in market. i was trying to find that provision but still i could not found this, so you are all requested to please send me any notification, verdict or any Act section regarding this on my mail id. skduliea@rediffmail.com
Sanjeev Duliea
9646478784
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
contempt of court
Union of India (UOI) moved the court for declaration of title and possession of a land owned by X. The land is situated within the boundary of Secunderabad Cantonment.
As UOI lost their case in the trial court and again their appeal was disallowed by the first additional chief judge,they closed the road leading to the land citing reference to security reasons. The X has no other access.
As no such restriction to the free movement on the road (Articles 19 & 21 of our Constitution) was imposed in the past, it seems reasonable to assume that UOI have done this purposely.
Though it was UOI appeal,where X was only respondents, can X make an Interim application to the same court for civil contempt for willful disobedience, interference or tend to interfere with, or obstruct or tends to obstruct, the administration of the judgment pronounced by the Honorable I Additional Chief Judge on 18th January 2011.
Further,the road is within the boundary of cantonment and subject to Cantonment Act 2006 and closing of roads under Section 258 is the duty and responsibility of the SCB. But the roads were closed by nominated Board members from the Army by their unilateral decision,contravening the Section 258. All elected Board members of the SCB, representatives of public, requested the General Commanding Officer of the Army (nominated President for the Secunderabad cantonment Board) to open these roads but unfortunately, he turned turned his deaf ears. Other 3 nominated Board members from the Army were also silent.The issue was referred in the local daily news papers.
This amounts to nominated Board members' irregular action in exercise of a statutory power or otherwise that are not consistent with or in accordance with the rules and procedures as stipulated in the cantonment Act 2006. They being the Public servants as per Section 36 of the Cantonment Act 2006 and as per Section 21 of Indian Penal Code, can X hold these nominated Board members from Army individually liable under Public Servants' Personal Liability Act 2006 for compensation.
will be grateful for your help and a quick response will be much appreciated as not only X is suffering but also all public including children going to schools are affected by this road closure.