Anonymous
27 April 2017 at 10:25
Sir,
My last working day was 14-april-2017, in a private company in Andhra Pradesh.
Our salary month start from 26 to 25 in next month.
My full and final settlement is not yet done as on 27/04/2017.
Company paid incremental arrears @6% on ctc to all employees regarding Fy 16-17 along with salary of march 17 (26/04/2017). Except me.
My question is I've worked throughout FY 16-17, and up to 14th April 2017 in FY 17-18.
When I talked with my hr. He told that arrears of fy16-17 will not be paid to you and regular salary of march 17 and April 17 will be paid in final settlement which is under process.
Please suggest in view of legality. And if i'm eligible for incremental arrears of fy 16-17. Plz suggest me how to get my dues from company.
I served complete notice period as per my appointment letter
Ranju
25 April 2017 at 17:02
Sir,
After 11 years of working experience in a Assam State PSU APL, I have applied for a post in BCPL CPSU (Through Proper Channel) after Selecting for the new post I submitted technical resignation for joining new CPSU. I have joined in BCPL October 2011. At that time of joining in BCPL, my previous company APL pay scale was not revised and it had been revised on July, 2013 w.e.f. April,2009.
After revision my Last Basic Pay in APCL becomes Rs 31,210/-(Revised Pay in Pay Band -Rs24,910/- +Grade Pay-Rs 6,300/-) whereas my Basic was in BCPL is Rs 24,900/- at the time of joining. My previous company APCL follow CDA pattern.
On August, 2013 I have applied for Pay Protection in BCPL, since BCPL already providing pay protection to employee joining from other CPSU/Central Govt.
Since then continuous follow up/request BCPL recently replied that my pay protection does not arise since overall salary (CTC) in BCPL more vis-a vis APL.
However as per my knowledge BCPL provided pay protection to other CPSU like HPCL/Central Govt Employee whose CTC is less than BCPL, in that considering only Basic and DA
i request the experts to give their valuable opinion for which i will be thankful to them.
With Regards
Sanjib Dutta
Aditi Agrawal
25 April 2017 at 16:13
Hello sir. I want to discuss with you about the tenants and their rights related to tenant evictions. The tenant has rent of 2,500₹ per month in 2017 and he has been a tenant for more than 35 years, starting rent was different and it has increased to 2,500₹ now. I want to know how the tenant can save himself from eviction and for how much time the tenant is safe from eviction. Sir, please provide all the related information related to this topic and other information.
Thank you.
Regards.
M Satyanarayana
25 April 2017 at 16:12
Sir,
I am petitioner filed for final decree proceedings served notice duly to the defendant to come for metes and bound. The defendant filed vakalat and not filed counter affidavit inspite of five long adjournments. My counsel adivsed me he will inform me when the counter is filed in CMO office by the defendant.
Please advise me how much time is given to the defendant to file counter and what to do if the counter is not filed by the defendant.
Thanking you,
M.SATYANARAYANA
Gurjap
25 April 2017 at 10:22
Sir, we are having a Case Of Job Selection Against The Govt. Who cancelled the posts.
There were posts of Building Inspector, accountant, Sanitary Inspector.
I was Selected as B.I.
And Our Next Hearing in The High Court is on 12th May.
But the hearing of S.I. and accountant is on 28nd April. (S.i. and acc. Have same adv. And we have the other one)
But Respondents are same in both case.
And reply from all respondents have been filled in court.
So can We file a CM tomorrow that Our case is same as that to be heared on 28th april. So our case should be clubbed up for hearing on 28th April instead of 12th May
Is it possible bcz Respondents are same and Reply has already been filled by all respondents??
Anonymous
23 April 2017 at 18:48
We are 5 sisters and 2 brothers.My father owned a pagdi flat in mumbai he died in 2005 my brothers continue to live there with the flat still on my father's name. Since then 1 brother died in 2012 his family lives there. We have a buyer for the property but my deceased brother's family aren't willing to sell and give our share. The other brother living there is agreeing to sell. We are a muslim family. We sisters are in desperate financial need.
Please advise
naushadsultan
20 April 2017 at 07:52
my late grand father's name spelling is different in different record and I have submitted all the record 1951, 1966 ,1971 voter data through Assam NRC website and latest voter list where it is reflected against my father's father name. but in Border SP office, Karimganj,Assam, India ..an office staff asking to get a certificate kind of something from local police station that the person name mentioned in documents was my grandfather and he was the same person as mentioned 1951, 1966 ,1977 voter data , I have alreday given a self declaration with required documents as asked by CID offcial and Investigation officer ..but still Border SP official is not accepting what the police station has sent them ..Pls advise
Devaraj
18 April 2017 at 14:43
Regarding: want to know what are all the land comes under this act - karnataka special land grabbing (prohibition) act 2011
because there is Government granted Scheduled caste land is under grabbing by politicians and local real estate peoples so is it come under the act. Land is situated at Tumkur Karnataka. how can i take this land issue to this court means Special land court set up by the Karnataka govt
It has been brought to the notice of Karnataka Government that certain lawless individuals are taking organised attempts to snatch by force, lands of the government or local authority, religious or charitable institutions. On these grabbed lands, they are building co-operative housing societies which are being sold unlawfully. In this way, the buyers are being cheated as well. And the land Grabbers are accumulating a huge amount of unaccounted wealth.
In order to prohibit such unlawful activities of land grabbers in the state and to give justice to the victims, Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act has been introduced.
According to this bill, not only the land grabbers are criminals but all the activities related to land grabbing are criminal offences and punishable under this Act. Therefore, no one should commit or get involved in this offence especially after the implementation of this Act. Even the companies that have committed such offence with the consent or due neglect on the part of any director, manager, secretary or another officer of the company would be held guilty and special charges would be levied against them.
In order to face and solve the huge number of litigations over the anti-encroachment drive, Karnataka government has decided to establish two special courts that would exclusively handle cases under the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act. These special courts shall consist of a chairman, who was a judge of a High Court; and four members, among whom two are or were District Judges and two others, should not hold a post below the rank of a Deputy Commissioner of the district. An additional Bench would also be appointed for speedy trials.
This Special Court on application made by a person, officer or authority would take into knowledge and try every case that would be arising out of allegations related to the act of land grabbing or with respect to the ownership of land or unlawful possession of land. These offences could have been committed before or after the commencement of the Land Grabbing Act. These courts will take into consideration the location, extent, value of the land that has been alleged to be grabbed and the nature of the evil involved in the case. The decision made by this court would be considered to be the final verdict. But, if the allegations are proven to be frivolous, then the court shall reject the case without any further enquiry. Once proven guilty, the land grabbers would be imprisoned for the duration of one to three years. They would also have to pay a fine of a minimum of Rs 25000. They might also be asked to return the grabbed land. Only a lawfully residing tenant would not be held guilty by the law.
Here is i found in internet a article on this:
Special Courts in Karnataka for Land Grabbing Cases
These courts are sure to bring a check on the land grabbers in Karnataka. In fact, the functioning of such a court has already started from 30th August 2016, and the trials are promised to be completed within six months.
mohit
15 April 2017 at 23:31
my marriage in 2010 as per hindu riti riwaz i have issue a girl child in 2011 my wife left my house in 2012 with my daughter after that she not come back to my home.in . my wife file a case in aug 2013 at his parent house u/s 125crpc when i go to attend this case i file a application to take her back my home but she voluantry refuse to come back with me . Than i file a section 9 rcr she come to attend the case and refuse to live with me case is pending . in his case u/s 125 crpc court reject my wife application on ground deseration 125(4) .in my case section 9 after ammend in 13 i got divorce on both ground crulity and deseration. now the she file a case of dv act section 12 and 20,22 demand 40 lakhs in his petion which is pending . sir my question is my daughter is now over 5 years age i want to my daughter back to my home can i file a custody case and where file it is possible to file in my place, sir i want to also know both case 125 crpc and divorced case in my favour can court consider this judgments in decideing custody case any advantages in my favour. sir if any citiaion please give me urgently requir thanks in advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Andhra pradesh non-trading companies act, 1962
Please any one provide ANDHRA PRADESH NON-TRADING COMPANIES ACT, 1962.i want to know Fees,penalities, compounding offence
Please paste the fees, penalities here or if there any publication (ANDHRA PRADESH NON-TRADING COMPANIES ACT, 1962) is there tell me the publication name,which place to available the publication