Adv. Umesh Chhangani
18 October 2013 at 13:57
Sir,
We are filing SA (Securitization Appeal) in DRT, in this case the bank has taken possession before 4 months and now the bank has put our property for sale by issuing sale notice to us. Now in this appeal we have challenged sale notice and also prayed for setting aside of possession notice also. DRT raised the objection that our limitation will start from the date of Possession notice and not from Sale Notice. as per the sale notice is concern we have filed it within limitation but so far as possession notice is concern we are not in limitation.Possession notice is of 4 months before and sale notice is of 40 days before
Now my query is that...
1) can we challenge the possession notice along with sale notice?
2) can we challenge both sale notice and possession notice now?
deepak garg
18 October 2013 at 13:16
Dear sir
can I get the case no in which supreme court set aside delhi high court decision regarding reasonable suitable accommodation ,where high court gave leave to defend to the petitioner as respondent also had a hall on first floor of the tenanted premises.
chirag
18 October 2013 at 13:04
is it valid for labour contractor to take his name in his salary sheet?
SAURABH KUMAR DIXIT
18 October 2013 at 12:59
SIR,
KYA 2/3 LOK SAMPATTI KSHTI NIVARAN ADHINIYAM CASE CHARGE SHEET COURT ME PESH KAR DI GYE HAI KYA YE COURT SE DOBARA INVESTICATION KE LIYE BAPAS HO SAKTI HAI !
Rajiv
18 October 2013 at 12:46
I paid payment via chq to Reliance BB, due signature mismatch bank stopped the payment and sent the chq to Reliance. Reliance disconnect my BB service, i paid payment by cash and request Reliance to return my uncleared chq, as bank wrongly stopped the payment and now agreed to refund penalties deducted from my SB account but on production of uncleared chq. i.e. with Reliance.
Now, Reliance is not giving my uncleared chq back, despite i have paid same bill payment in cash and next bill payment with Rs.100/- penalties.
Kindly advise what legal action can be taken against Reliance a Police Complaint first or directly legal notice or consumer court.
Please guide, tnx and regards
chethan
18 October 2013 at 12:25
hi sir
this chethan, i had problem with my parents & uncles partitioned ancestral property already and registered the same,but the thing is they are not partitioned property equally, some one got more some one got too less. can we question it in court now?
(my grand parents passed away already. after their death my father and uncles partitioned their parents property)
sheshadri
18 October 2013 at 11:54
regarding retrospective effect
Daljit Singh Mann
18 October 2013 at 11:34
Please post the sample reply to the application under section 80(2)cpc
Thanks and have a meaningful day.
Mrs Renu
18 October 2013 at 09:50
Dear Sir,
I shall be very thankful to you if you pl pass us your expert advice as this time I have no hope how to come out from this trauma and how a person can get acquittal, as he has done no crime at all.
Our case was u/s 325.In the Trial due to the negligence of our own lawyer she has not crossed examined , Doctor has not turned up for cross examination despite of 3 reminders to him. Only Hospital clerk came and identified signature of only one doctor and not of other doctor. X plate also not exhibited. By mere seeing the work grievous hurt MM convicted the accused. Police IO stated that he has not seen any bricks at the spot of incident not there is any seziure of object nor any public witness.
Applied for appeal we had submitted two judgments of Bombay High court and of Chandigarh High court where the accused was acquitted only on one point that Doctor has not been cross examined. ADJ has not taken into consideration those verdicts of High court and dismissed the appeal . He has not granted interim bail. He has not granted probation to him and took him into custody.
Now my query is:-
ADJ has done discrimination and it is infringe of Rights .
On what grounds he has not taken into account those two judgments similiar to our case but acquittal has been granted to petitioner.
How judge himself can do the work of Doctor.
His knowledge is not updated ADJ is not aware of the latest decisions of High courts and amendments. There is latest amendment on section 325 and High court of Delhi passed its judgment on the basis of that. "Grievous hurt is that where the part of the body is to be changed Pivotal of body part or it has continuous pain for 20 days. Crl Rev P 222/2010
Here is our case on MLC paitient not having any bleeding not unconscious, simple pain killer, bandage, no advice for further examination or any other xray. Wrote dislocation. As per orthopaedic advice dislocation means severe pain on that joint, it needs plaster for 3-4 weeks and after that xray.
Complainant stated in his statement that a brick thrown on him and his middle finger got injured. A brick would only injured one and only one finger? On MLC it is stated that there is a cut of 0.5 mm on middle finger and nimbness on index finger. X ray is showing dislocation of middle finger.
Without getting any clarification on these vital noting of doctor and radiologist how Judges are presumed that it is grevious hurt and put the person into custody.
So as per our own little mind both the judges have done discrimination and without getting the expert advice and cross examination of doctor they have concluded the case & put a social stigma on an innocent person. They both have shown inhuminity by not granting interim bail and probation to a Sr.Citizen of 63 years old.
This person is fighting a case for the last 20 years.
A self driven injury by a crocked person gave mental tension, social stigma, loss of money , On what grounds such people can be booked ?
If we approach to HC can we be able to get the acquittal on the negligence & injustice done by both the judges > Is there is no provision that HC can question those judges who are passing their judgments without applying their mind.
Thanking you,
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Hra
Sir,
At present we are paying Rs. 7042.00 to our contract labours & securities as per factory act. Whether we have to addtionally HRA or HRA is already included in this.
Thanks,
Gurao