A has been living with his stranger denoted 'B' like a adopted son since his childhood but no adoption deed created. after attaining his majority he purchased some immovable property in the name of B. B has also many immovable property by his own efforts. Now, B is very old and intend to give entire properties purchased by him. Can B create a deed of adoption to succeed his entire property after death or what best mode of transfer the property to A in which A could not avail huge stamp duty will be better ? Suggest with SC or HC decisions.
friend
20 October 2013 at 09:20
i have a troubled marriage.but till now have no court cases or anything.i live with my parents in a house owned by my father(not ancestral).
it is a old house and i want to rebuild(reconstruct) it by taking a house loan from the bank.
my father is a retired govt. employee.
i want to take a house loan and repay it from my salary.there is no change of ownership. only the loan will be payed by me.
if she goes to the court will she have any share in the property(house)owned by my father.
what are the legal issues related to it.kindly advice.
thank you.
Deepakraj G
20 October 2013 at 08:36
In one of the complaint u/s 138 of N.I.Act, the Magistrate has not signed the acceptance , verification and issue process order.Merely complainant has signed the complaint and verification. In spite of that summons were served. What is the status and legality of the complaint ? Is not Non Entia ( Things in Non Existance). Pls clarify.
my friend purchased the land,which was registered since 15 years back he was not mutated the said land .
1.now the vendor trying to file civil suit based on the mutation record,to harass my friend .will the vendor succeed in the case.
2.in the EC STATEMENT vendor'S name was mistaken ,(in sale deed orginal name is narshima chary but in EC narshima reddy)which creates any problem sir.
3.original sale deed has no mistakes,at this stage what steps i have to be taken in the hon'ble court.
pls give me suggestion and mutation related case laws .
jay pathak
20 October 2013 at 06:47
I got married on 20 april 2012 in pune. my wife was working in a reputed company over there.i am working in a govt job in ahmedabad. after our marriage we went for honeymoon. after honemymoon she left for pune for seeking transfer. she took a transfer to ahmedabad.she stayed in ahmedabad and started working in the company. her father used to threaten me. she asked her father to come down to ahmedabad to apologise. However when her father came in ahmedabad along with her relatives he started a quarrel and my wife left with him. Before going she filed a statement in local police station regarding quarrel and threats issued by her father and said that she does not want to file a complain against me or my family memebers and she is going as per own wishes to pune. she left for pune on 08 august 2012 on the same day of the quarrel and same day of filing police statement.She was staying in pune and after my insisting telephonically she resigned from her job in december 2012.
After that she delivered a baby boy in february 2013. however she never insisted on coming back and staying with me. In october 2013 she joined the job in the same company in pune without consultation with me. now she is refusing to come back to ahmedabad. she is asking me to come on weekends/or take a new job in pune. i have not seen my kid and i cannot go over there because of the police statement nor she is ready to come back to ahmedabad. it is 15 months now. what should i do?
SUBHASH SHARMA
20 October 2013 at 01:25
ONE OF MY CLIENT LADY(JYOTI) WHO HAD BEEN LIVING SEPARATELY FROM HER HUSBAND FROM LAST THREE YEARS(SINCE 2010)
HER HUSBAND (RAMESH) USED TO BEAT HER BRUTALLY AND HER CHILDREN AFTER DRINK AND USED TO ABUSED IN A BIG WAY.
SHE HAS FILED ON EASE U/S 125 FOR MAINTENANCE WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE DISCTRICT COURT.
SHE (JYOTI) ALSO FILED ONE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT BEFORE CAW CELL.
RAMESH HAS FILED ONE CASE U/s 9 HINDU MARRIAGE ACT TO GET HIS WIFE BACK.
CAW CELL APPOINTED A MEDIATION AND COMPROMISED BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.
WIFE JYOTI WENT BACK TO HER MATRIMONIAL HOUSE. IN THE SAME NIGHT HUSBAND (REMESH) AGAIN STARTED BETING HER,ABUSING IN A BIG WAY,BEATING THE CHILDREN AFTER DRINKING.
IN THIS CASE WHAT CAN BE DONE.
PLEASE ADVISE.
Arvind Manghirmalani
19 October 2013 at 23:03
suit under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 (for brevity said section) is of summary in nature. Section 6 (3) specifies that no appeal lies against any decree or order passed under said section 6. District Court allows application for Appointment of Receiver under O-40 of CPC. then under what section or law an Appeal in respect of interlocutory order of appointment of Receiver in suit under said section 6 lies. which are the reported supreme court or High court judgments.
adv Arvind
09869617090
pushpakrishna
19 October 2013 at 22:25
Dear Experts,
A person was doing business and filed an insolvency petition for Rs.1,10,00,000/-showing various Creditors in the court of law and the court has given number and sent the notices to the creditors.But he did not shown any properties liquid or fixed assets nor any cash balances nor any debtors in his IP.even he did not filed any Books of Accounts.we can contest the matter and defeat the case. in the mean time limitation effects the creditors to file cases against him. Hence i request you all can we challenge the petition in the High Court to cancel the IP.or is it better to file civil cases against him for recovery of the amount by the creditors.Kindly advice in this regard.Thanq.
anupam sharma
19 October 2013 at 22:23
A man was convicted by trial court. Session Court give order to free man on probation in appeal but appeal was dismissed and conviction order upheld. What does the order means? Is the man free and does not have to go to jail at all? Is the order not contradictory in itself as on one hand appeal is dismissed and conviction upheld with modification of order of trial court as to probation. Does any revision lies in high court?
Tenancy act
tenancy act could not applied for widow's land?
is it right or wrong?
accorging to below these act.
1. Hyderabad tenancy and Agricultural Act.
2. Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act.