prakash
22 October 2013 at 12:08
Dear sir
Partition suit is pending in the court for 6 Acres of land, for three brothers,the last brother has given the land to till on lease basis,if we go and ask to leave our land he will threat us and beat us,we have given the compliant the police favored them,what to do sir ,the 6Acers of land is in first brothers name he his aged plz advise,.
regards
prakash
AMIT KUMAR SHARMA
22 October 2013 at 11:41
Dear Sir,
If “Will” made and registered with registrar, can Legatee make another will to other person without cancelled first?
Can second Will valid without cancelled first?
Can Will become irrevocable?
Please help
kavitha
22 October 2013 at 11:20
Hi,
I had wrong date of birth in all my certificates(ssc,passport,proof f birth,caste....etc). Actually what happened is... In my school days i don't know the exact date of birth so, my teachers entered the wrong date.
now, i got to know that certificate b'day is 07-06-1985 but my actual dob is in 87 please suggest any possible way to correct my birthdate in all my certificates...
It's very necessary for me to apply govt jobs.
Please suggest ....
Thanks,
Kavitha.
Law Aspire
22 October 2013 at 11:15
Dear Experts.
Please Elaborate the Term “Race” given in Article 15 of the Indian Constitution. What this term will include? Please give some example.
Reagards
Rachit Inani
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
22 October 2013 at 11:11
my grand mother and grandfather had died,they had 10 acr land which was not partitioned.
in this family members are two sons and two daughters.two daughters got married since 50 years back and also they got children.the said land was orally partitioned between the sons they are enjoying the property.
but at the time of daughters marriage my grand mother said that i will give you the SHARE IN THE said land to the daughters but which was not followed.
1. now the married daughters have any right over the above said land.
2.can we(daughters sons) go for court for partition .
3.whether the above said property comes under ancestral property or not.
PLS GIVE ME THE SUGGESTION SIR.
THANK YOU SIR.
Indrajit das
22 October 2013 at 10:42
please read my attach file and honestly that is false & I can prove that my wife is never live with me at my workplace.please somebody advise me what to do..
robin
22 October 2013 at 10:40
a person gave me a demand draft of Rs 650 nearly 8 months ago.
I forgot to deposit the draft in bank .
now it is 8 month's older.
The draft expiry ends.
now what will I do?
How will I get the money?
KAUSER
22 October 2013 at 10:33
Hi,
Our building is about to go under redevelopment and for that our landlord is giving the terms and condition and other related promises on stamp paper of Rs.20/- only.Shall we accept that Rs.20/- stamp paper or we should ask for Rs.100/- stamp paper? Kindly give your esteemed suggestion/guidence.
Thank you,
Anonymous
22 October 2013 at 09:20
Watrant has been issued against one of relative on n.i. act 138. Now is it possible to take bail by representative or lawyer or its mandatory to be physically present in the court ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Implied acceptance
I am stuck on this.
I entered into a contract to sell my medicines to a buyer. Before the purchase, the medicines had to be tested in a laboratory. Since there was dispute in their testing methods, they directed me to have tests done myself at a another lab.
I suggested lab A to which they refused. Then I suggested lab B and C. They did not reply to this request, so I carried out the tests myself.
Later they asked me to send them the test results. They received, read, scrutinized the test results and made a report on it stating what all they found faulty in the result.
It would be nice to get a case law also
Now since we are in for arbitration, can they deny the reports on the ground that they had not permitted me to conduct the tests? Considering they directed me to get tests done myself, did not suggest where, when i conducted them, they asked for the reports, read it, and also outlined what they found erroneous in the tests.
Wasn't calling for the reports and reading them implied acceptance and shouldn't there be an estoppel on them for denying permission.