sushila modi
23 October 2013 at 19:07
Respected all,
Due to change in circumstances can Respondent may file appeal u/s 127 of CrPC in case of DV Act-2005.
Or
only u/s 29 of DV act is only remedy
thanks in advance
Deep Kumar Saha
23 October 2013 at 17:39
I want to take a lease of the property owned by a minor and his father intends to give it on lease. In such a case who will sign the lease deed.
mahmood mithani
23 October 2013 at 17:33
Pls advice if there can be joint secretary in a housing society? pls also suggest can he be a one of signatory on the cheques to be issued?
tnx
SR Upadhyay
23 October 2013 at 16:28
I own a car with Delhi registration no which will be expiring its initial registration(i.e.15 years) in the month of Dec 13. I am a central govt emplyee and presently posted at Bhuj(Gujrat).Now I need to do re-registration of same car at Bhju, Gujarat with the present registratration no in stead of going all along to Delhi for physical verification by MVI, Delhi.Is there any such possibility of paying road tax/re-registration/physical varification of vehicle at Bhuj which will help me from spending extra expenditure. Can any body advise on subject? I will be thankful to him for his good advice.
adv.durgadas k.kulkarni
23 October 2013 at 15:27
Father having a big plot,but he doesn't allow his only one son to develop it.Son wants to alienate it to developer.
Can son sale his share without the consent of his father as per Hindu Law?
adv.durgadas k.kulkarni
23 October 2013 at 15:22
Father having a big plot,but he doesn't allow his only one son to develop it.Son wants to alienate it to developer.
Can son sale his share without the consent of his father as per Hindu Law?
SUBIR KUMAR SANYAL
23 October 2013 at 15:13
One of my friends was employed in a healthcare organization for about one and half years. He resigned from his post a month before. But intentionally, the employer donot intend to sign on the EPF Documents of the said employee which is essential for EPF Claim.
Please suggest what to do ?
S. Fernandes
23 October 2013 at 13:55
Dear Mr Raj Kumar, Thank you and all others for the kind assitance. This is the time line in the matter: Dec 09: I filled suit for money recovery,against partnership firm of four parners,along with an application under O39 for temp injunction to restraint the defendants from alianating their partnership property being a factory premise,wich is the only asset available to settle m y dues. Feb 10: During the subsistance of the suit and injunction proceedings the defendants through a POA on behalf of Partners sold the said factory premises to third party. Third Party mordgages the said factory premise to Bank. April 10: Court passes order of injunction as prayed, in my favour. Oct 10: Suit decreed as prayed, in my favour. July 12: I file in capacity now of DH, Execution proceedings. Aug 13: I attach the factory property. The said Third Party files objections under R58 of O21 praying that attachment be lifted as the said factory premises have been purchased by him prior to the decree being passed, and further disclosed that the said factory premises are also mortgaged to the bank all in Feb'10. Bank (mortgagee) has not appeared to date, even though third party(mortgager)has filled objections filled objections. Partnership Firm still subsists. No Business being carriedout as business premises, being the said Factory premises is sold to said Third Party. Questions: 1- Can Partnership Property be sold even though the Partnership is not desolved. The principal business of the Partnership was the manufacture and sale of Ice Creams. 2 - Can Partnership during the subsistance of the partnership be sold through a POA. Reference sec 19, 20 & 22 of Partnership act 192. 3 - Is this a lis pendant sale. 4- Can the bank(mortgagee) who has not reponded to the atachment be ignored.
saurav
23 October 2013 at 13:34
whether second amendment application is maintainable when the previous is dismissed on ground that it is not filed as per procedure i.e. non filing of amended plaint with the application. any citation...
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Child custody
Sir,
This in Continuation to my Previous Query were in i was advised to wait till next hearing the previous Query was
"On 02-09-2013 the Hon'ble Court directed the advocate of my opposite party to get my baby along with the lady on 13-09-2013 so that the father can see her daughter.On 13-09-2013,neither the lady attended the court nor brought my daughter to the court & 13-09-2013 hearing, the advocate of 2nd party said he will definitely get the baby on next hearing which was on 01-10-2013,but yesterday the situation was no more different neither the lady nor baby came to court.They Advocate of 2nd party submitted that Mamaji of the lady has expired few days back,That is true the Mamaji of lady expired some 20 days back.I feel they are simply playing delay tactics ,please advise what to do."
Now The case was for hearing on 21-10-2013,the same history repeated,the Junior Counsel of my opposite party attended,but my Counsel requested the Judge to send a warrant through the Concerned Police Station, but Judge told the Junior Counsel to get your senior & kept the case pending.My counsel then went in other Court to attended his other cases,In the mean while I saw senior Counsel of my opposite party coming out of Judge chamber during the break time & when i enquired from the concerned clerk he said he was discussing the case & in next hearing they will get the baby & gave me next date after 10 days.I told my counsel same he told me dont worry they have get the baby.I donot know what Judge & the senior Counsel of Opposite party discussed in the chamber of Judge & what has been written on the file.
So please share your experience what they will do on next date & what is advise for me.