Srinivas Jerripothula
25 October 2013 at 11:12
Hi All
I am srinivas from hyderabad. I have small query. Actually we resides in slum area in hyderabad. There was an empty land which was under municipality. One advocate, has planned and he kept shiva lingam and created rumors as there has to construct temple. Then he collected amounts and he sold out some empty lands in our slum to poor people 60 square yards for one lakh. He collected amounts from bar associations and some small leaders. He constructed half only and recently he brought a new house in good area and he shifted from our slum. Now nobody is taking care of that temple. I asked him several times and he always tells us that within two days or three days it will complete. Sir, i want to take action against him. Please for god grace tell me the process how to take action against him. He formed one trust also but we cannot file RTI on that trust. He is not even providing trust details. I request everyone to please provide me some good suggestions.
Thanks
J. Srinivas
Rajesh
25 October 2013 at 10:57
Id after the owner of a flat is deceased, there are three legal heirs, how do we transfer the ownership of the flat in the name of one? One of the heirs would like to gift his right on the property and the other is ready to relinquish the right in leiu of money. How many documents will need to be made and whats the registration/stamp duty charges in Mumbai for the same? What is the final documents which completes the ownership tranfer in the name of one person in the above scenario? This is to be used as address proof to change the name on the utility bills etc. Is there any role for the co-operative society in the above procedure?
Sathish
25 October 2013 at 10:40
Hi,
Whether we can transfer the unavailed cenvat credit from one company to other related companies (Group Company but no share holding). Whether there is any possiblity to claim the unavailed credit from Govt.
Regards
Sathish
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
25 October 2013 at 10:33
DEAR EXPERTS ,
DVC CASE HAS BEEN FILED IN THE HON'BLE CORT ,IN THE CASE NO OF RESPONDENTS ARE SEVEN INCLUDING TWO SISTERS.THE SISTERS AND REST ARE RESIDING AND WORKING DIFFERENT PLACES AS ACTUALLY THEY ARE NOT COMBINED FAMILY .
Q1.NOW THE RESPONDENTS SISTERS NOT APPEARING THE HON'BLE COURT,SISTERS WANTED TO FILE PETITION UNDER C.P.C ORDER I RULE 12 FOR HIS MOTHER(R2) IS AUTHORISED TO ATTEND ON BEHALF OF SISTERS(R3,R4).
Q2.IS IT POSSIBLE TO FILE PETITION UNDER CPC WHETHER IT IS ALLOWED OR NOT .
Q3.IF POSSIBLE AFFIDAVIT WITH PETITION IS TO BE FILED OR ONLY PETITION TO BE FILED.
PLS GIVE ME SUGGESTION SIR
THAMK YOU
Member (Account Deleted)
25 October 2013 at 08:39
Dear Expert
Pls guide me.
1. That my case U/s 279,337,338,427 IPC is pending in the Court of Patiala for prosecution evidence.
2. That all prosecution witness examined except Investigating officer.
3. That Investigating officer did not come present despite the fact that court issued summons to him several time but he did not come due to inconivience with accused.
4. That on 19-10-2013 Ld. Court granted last opportunity to investigating Officer to appear on 28-10-13.
My question if if the prosecution evidence is closed without examining Investigating officer the very purpose of the case will defeated.Pls guide me what will I do now also intimate me any authotiry of supreme court & Punjab & Haryana Court in this regard also
Ajay Sharma
25 October 2013 at 07:17
Hello Respected Expert
My sister in law filled 498a case against my elder brother and parents 2 months back
In our family there are total five meber inluding my wif, as per current FIR myself and my wife is not an accused. and we had taken bail for all three of them.
In the Fir she mentioned few things about my self and my wife like:
1.when ever my brither used to beat her at that time i am encouraging him
2.becaz they are more fear about that how the harresment will took place to only one sister in-law, she said that becaz my wife bring more dowry she has not been harrased.
My question is in the light of above to circumstances what could be the charges police can framed agaist both of us.
OR is there is any chances that our name also going to be included in final chargesheet.
Thanks
Mrunmai Deshpande
25 October 2013 at 06:20
I am 40 years of age and divorced. I was earning Rs10000/- pm and was asked to pay Rs2000/- pm as child maintenance by court. I was paying this money regularly. But, of late, the company I was working for has gone into liquidation and hence I am jobless. I am not finding a suitable job. I have following queries.
1. How can I pay child maintenance if I am jobless?
2. If I get a job with less than Rs10000/- pm salary, will the court consider reducing child maintenance?
Please advise!
siri
25 October 2013 at 01:21
Respected sir/madam,
i'm technical graduate applied for passport and it was issued.but i have criminal track record of a bailable offense which is pending in high court for quash and it is a cross complaint and soon will get quashed. initially when i applied for passport i heard from someone that the person applying for passport should not be convicted under any criminal offense and if so should furnish the details of the case. i applied through a broker because of which cannot see the conditions and after entering in to passport office on the appointment date i came to know that even pending criminal cases should not be there. if any cases are there, need to furnish the details of the case.but at the last leg i was unable to reveal the information. now i'm scared that i did a mistake of suppression of facts which was not intentional.what are the steps or measures i can take to come out of this situation. please suggest !!!! no problem till now but wanted to correct my mistake.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Denovo enquiry
In a deparmental disciplinary action case,in Kerala State Electricity Board, One Inquiry officer and Presenting officer were posted to inquire allegations against 5 trade Union activists(Employees)who conducted GHERAO of an Officer. As both of these officers were supporters of the trade union,they completed the inquiry, even without hearing the Complainant or his witness. As the enquiry report was found absolutely biased and incomplete the Disciplinary Authority rejected the Report and posted another enquiry with the same charge sheet.
1. Was it correct to reject the report of the First Inqiry Officer?
2.Can a re- enquiry is legal?
3.Whether the actions of the First Inquiry officers can be treated as Misconduct of Govt Servants?