Tinku Bhai
09 November 2013 at 18:12
SIR this query is of a my muslim friend SABIR
sabir pahle se hi shadishuda tha. 2010 me use park me ek mahila mili. us mahila ne sabir ko apne prem jaal me phansa. isi beech ye mahila our uski maan uska bhai uska father our ye mahila bhi ek case me 420.467.468.471.120b ipc me jail chale gaye . Sabir us mahila se jail me milne jata raha. 6 months ke baad is mahila ki zamanat hui. Sabir ne is mahila se shaadi kar li our is mahila ko apne naam par ek makan kharidkar de diya .Sabir ek do din is mahila ke saath rehata our baki 5 din apni pehli wife ke saath rehne laga. ek din Sabir ne is mahila ko court me ghumte dekha. shak hone par Sabir ne khojbeen ki to pata laga ki is mahila ne apne pehle husband ke khilaf 498a ka mukadma kar rakha hai. sabir ne is baare me is mahila se baat ki to ye mahila ulte Sabir ko darane dhamkane our blackmail karne lagi. Sabir ne is mahila our uske pariwaar walon ke virudh 386,387,389 ipc ka mukadma (156)3 me karaya, .yeh mahila Sabir ko phone par jaan se marne ki dhamkiya dene lagi our Sabir ka makan apne naam karane ka dabav banane lagi.in sabke beech is mahila ne police se apni khoobsurati ke bal par dosti kar li. Our Sabir ke workplace per aakar Sabir ko galiyan dene lagi work place par roz roz aakar hangama karne lagi. tang aakar Sabir ne police ke uch adhikariyon ko written prarthna patra likhe .prarthna patr concerned thaane me aate our police yeh report lagati rahi ki Sabir makan khaali karaane ke liye false application likhta hai. is mahila ne Sabir ke virudh (156)3 me 498a,323,3\4 ka false mukadma likhwaya. Sabir ne jo 386,387,389 ka mukadma jo is mahila our uske pariwaar walon ke virudh likhwaya thha us mukadame me police ne yeh kahte hue final report laga di ki Sabir ne makaan khaali karaane ke liye false mukadama likhwaya hai.yeh mahila sattadhaari netaon ke paas jaane lagi.Sabir ne darkar compromise kar liya .is mahila dwara kiye gaye false 498a ke mukadme me bhi police ne final report laga di our court ne final report ko accept kar liya.Sabir ke 386,387,389 ke mukadme me final report to laga di thi lekin court ne abhi tak final report ko accept nahi kiya hai.11th November is fixed for this.ab is mahila ki behan ki shaadi hone waali hai. is mahila ne sabir ke ooper paisa mangne ka dabav banana shuru kar diya hai. Sabir ke mana karne par phir se phone par gandi gandi gaaliyan dena prarambh kar diya hai our yeh dhamki bhi phone par di hai ki apne sharir par Talwaar markar Sabir ke khilaf 307 ipc ka farji mukadma darj karwayegi. is dhamki ki call recordind Sabir ke paas hai.Sabir is dhamki se dara hua hai ki yeh mahila phir se work place par hangama karegi.court campus bhi Sabir ke liye safe nahi hai.
Sabir now wants
how to get rid of this woman
where to get relief from
can Allahabad high court give some relief to Sabir?
how to get sabir s own house vacant from this woman?
under what section of act sabir get declared his marriage with this woman As void? because this woman has not got talak from his previous husband.
how to get this woman stopped to call Sabir over phone.if any stay order can be granted in this regard.if Sabir does not recieve her phone she changes phone numbers.
can she got punished as she is running one case of false 498a,3\4 against her previous husband.this case is running even now. 2nd false 498a on Sabir which results final report and accepted by court.
should sabir file protest petition against final report in a case of 386,387,389,120b ipc ?
what special relief can be asked from high court?
how to stop this woman to come to sabirs work place?
as this woman is already an accused of an another case of 420,467,468,471 and charge sheeted will this help something to prove her character ?
suggestions are invited from the learned members to save the life of an innocent person thanks with regard.
Siddhi Agarwal
09 November 2013 at 16:41
The execution filed by me in 2011 is still pending due to frequent vacant court at Dindoshi Court and so far 5 judges have been transferred. a) Out of 5 families of sons of late father who expired intestate only two families are opposing the execution petition to knock down huge extra money from me (petitioner)although they have accepted the consent terms filed in the court. b) These two families are of criminal mindset with back ground of forgery and theft etc and are occupying the two flats as permissible user subsequent to Consent Term filed in the court in 2009. The rental value of these two flats id Rs.80000/- pm. Now my queries are as under: 1) Can these families be made liable to pay the share of the rental value as they are just the permissible user and the fact they are living in the two flat without any rent. 2) Can the execution petition be challenged and making it time barred on the basis of a judgement of a high court AIR 2005 Delhi 154 Novartis v/s Wander P. Ltd. inspite of the fact that the two defendant families are involved in forgery and thefts etc. 3) Each petition is of specific nature with diff. circumstances and documentary. Experts pl. guide and help in the matter. evidances
engineer_it
09 November 2013 at 15:28
Hi
My brother is working with a Multinational firm. Intially he was working in india then for some assignment he went to UK for 6-7 months.
Now after coming from UK he found that he is still getting credited with Uk salary in his uk bank account where as he should be getting indian salary.
On finding out why its happening he got to know that his manager by mistake gave wrong end date of his assignment in uk to payroll team so he will keep getting his uk salary for next 1 year instead of his indian salary.
As he was getting huge amount of money in his uk account he did not inform company about it.Now the queries are :
1) should he tell company about it?
2) If company gets to know on its own will he be fired or they can file a case against him as he did not inform them ?
3) wat are the ways by which he can safeguard himself and still keep the money?
4) can company file a case against him and ask him to return the money credited in his uk account over the period of mlast few months?
thanks for ur replies in advance
Yogesh
09 November 2013 at 15:24
I want to file PIL (Public Interest Litigation), in the matter of rights of Innovator and Researcher, on the legal ground of “under the Article 16(1) & Article 51A(h) in The Constitution Of India”.
But I am confusing, which is appropriate court for my case either Supreme Court or High Court, if you see there are two legal grounds of my case one is concern with Fundamental rights and another is Fundamental duty.
I also inform you that, this is the truth something going wrong with Innovator and Researcher of our India, but it’s going critical to find with reference to legal grounds.
The matter concerned with all Indian Innovator and Researcher, the directly beneficiary are Indian Innovator and Researcher not to the particular any state that’s the point, and indirectly beneficiary are whole India, in short the matter is not concern with particular any state of India.
In that of case which court is proper either SC or HC.
Confused because Article 51A(h) is not concern with Fundamental rights. Than can I applicable in SC because according to my basic understanding, SC deals with only for Fundamental rights of part 3 of constitution. This is the confusion about SC.
I confused about HC, because the power of HC applicable in only state level, and the matter of my case is concern with all Indian Innovator and Researcher. According to my basic understanding, I think HC not applicable to take any order at national level, that the confusion about HC.
There are two responds, both offices available in Delhi, one respondent is “PM” and another is “Department of Science and Technology”
For proper details of my petition kindly go with following web link,
http://www.change.org/petitions/president-of-india-save-grassroots-innovators-researcher-make-self-dependant-india-decrease-import
Please guide me; I am doing with pure mind and pure hand.
Dattatreya
09 November 2013 at 14:26
The Property is developed by Vysya Griha Nirmana Sangha Bangalore. The SAid property is situated on 100feet ring Road. The Guidance Value for Vysya Bank Gruha Nirman Sangha is Rs 4500 per sq feet and for 100 Ring Road is Rs 8000/- per sq feet. What is the Guidance Value which is to be considered. is there any way i shall get certified copy from the competeant authority about the Guidance Value
Afreen Hina
09 November 2013 at 14:25
Hello
My name is Afreen,can we file a case in delhi court for properties locate in Jaunpur UP.
meee
09 November 2013 at 14:05
sir, i would like to know the time period for departmental enquiry in indian central govt. i'm from CRPF. My dept. said that no time period for department for imposing punishments to sub ordinate. Also my dept. said that, only rule made for individual for timily submission of statment, appel, revision, etc. Plz help me sir.
Dattatreya
09 November 2013 at 13:52
The Property is developed by Vysya Griha Nirmana Sangha Bangalore. The SAid property is situated on 100feet ring Road. The Guidance Value for Vysya Bank Gruha Nirman Sangha is Rs 4500 per sq feet and for 100 Ring Road is Rs 8000/- per sq feet. What is the Guidance Value which is to be considered. is there any way i shall get certified copy from the competeant authority about the Guidance Value
vivaasvann
09 November 2013 at 13:21
My Grandmother purchased a property in 1950 in name of my mother who was 8 years at that time. My Grandmother purchased it using funds set aside for my mother. My grandmother in 1972 executed a will in which she distributed the very same property to others and excluded my mother saying that my mother did not prove to be a responsible daughter. Today - Can my mother challange my grandmothers WILL saying that , by 1972 my mother was Major and owner of that property and today my mother is the actual owner of the property. please help
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Lien for a time barred loan
Hello,
I need expert opinion regarding time barred claim.
We took an educational loan in 2007. Till 2009, we paid all the EMIs regularly. Later the bank misplaced/mishandled the loan details and refused to accept the EMI. By mistake they saved it as a Housing Loan instead of Educational Loan. Even after repeatedly asking for the EMI details, they didn't give us any details of outstanding loan amount. Therefore we stopped paying installments. There was no notice sent by the bank till 3 years.
After 3 years, in 2013, they called my father and asked for the payment. My father knew about the Time Barred limitation and hence he didn't give any acknowledgement to the bank. My father asked them to send a legal notice but the bank manger didn't send us any notice (as he knows that they can't get the claim legally after 3 years).
One month back, some amount was debited to the account for Income Tax rebate. The Bank is not allowing us to take the money from the account anymore saying that it is a "Freeze Account" in lien of the unpaid educational loan. The amount is shown as a ledger transaction not available for withdrawal. The available balance is shown as negative amount.
Is it legal for the bank to lien a account for a Time Barred loan? What can we do to withdraw the money from this account? Please advice us regarding this.
Thanking you in anticipation.
Best Regards,
Priya.