Tejas
07 January 2014 at 15:13
Dear All,
I have received token amount from the customer before 3 months, and now after wasting such a long period they are asking for returning back their token amount. They paid amount by cash and MOU was also not prepared.
Kindly advice.
Misti
07 January 2014 at 15:09
Myself and my ex husband had adopted a daughter in the 2007. we applied for a divorce in 2010 and in 2013 we finally got the divorce, As per the decree I am the custodian and he has the visitation right and a temporary custody whenever he stays in India. Now as she is an adopted daughter I don't want her to stay out of the house without me therefore want to revoke the temporary custody from his part. My daughter also doesn't want to go. its me who every time put pressure on her to go just to abide the rule . My question is
1) Can I appeal to the court so that she uses my maiden surname?
2) Can I keep only the visitation right for my ex husband instead of temporary custody
thanks for your help
madanlal pande
07 January 2014 at 14:58
I was married in Jan 2011
separated in may 2011
she is BE chemical but currently not doing job.
I’m Mechanical engg doing job but not admitted in court. Also they even not provided any evidence abt my job
she expecting maintenance = 10000.
Before marriage she was doing job. After marriage to separation she was not doing any job.
After separation, she joined one job and left job after 6 months and before filing crpc 125
During her cross she was admitted that before marriage she was doing job. But denied of after marriage. (she lied in court)
I have submitted both of her job proofs in my cheaf....
During my cross her lawyer lady asked me
__whether petitioner was working before marriage? Yes
__After marriage till separation was she in servicing No
__Do you have any documentary proof whether she is working ? NO
she lied in court abt doing job after marriage. But after providing my evidences about her past two jobs. She submitted her resignation letter of second job in court during my cross .... even if her evidences was closed earlier.
My question My argument was she lied in court... came with unclean hands But her lawyer had already ask me that “After marriage till separation she was not in servicing
So is it mean that she is not lying ? her lawyers is argued that milord “after separation she was servicing” not after marriage till separation. Petitioner was not lied.
Sunny
07 January 2014 at 14:46
Hi,
We are basically two brothers from faridabad.
Our qerry is one of our family property is in the name of our mother and our mother passed away in 2004 without a will.
I want to know
1)As per law who will be the legal heir of this property.
2)legally can we sell this propery on the basis of mother's conveyance deed.
3)or Can we trf the title of this property in our name without involving our father.(As on date our father is now engaged with other woman and this is his 8th marriage post 2004)
Urgently need your advice on this as we need to save our mother property.
VINOD KUMAR MALSARIA
07 January 2014 at 14:18
FIR lodged agianst builder under 420 but investigation officer not done the proper investigation under presser of builder & report submit in court saying that no any case make agsinst the builder ,
Q- Can we challange this report in court?
Dharmender
07 January 2014 at 14:04
My wife has filed case under 498a in Nov 2007. I have filed under sec 482 in Allahabad high court on quashing of summoning orders. There were six members of family Husband ,Father-in-law,mother-in-law,2 sister-in-law and one sister husband. The high court rejected the application against sister-in-law and her husband in Dec 2009 and asked to move discharge application which is still pending. The high court sent case of rest 4 to mediation which failed. Now high court has rejected the case under sec 482. The order is attached here with.
Its a complaint case filed with ulterior motives
My question is can I go to Supreme Court for all members as High court has rejected on the basis that earlier application against 2 was rejected earlier.
What are the remedies.
The order of High Court is:-
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 14.11.2008 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar and for quashing the entire proceeding of complaint case no. 10070 of 2007, Bhawna Arora Vs. Dharmendra Kumar, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar. The matter was referred before the Mediation Centre by the order dated 18.12.2008. As per the report received from the Mediation Centre, the parties have appeared, however the Mediation has failed as there was no settlement in between the parties. Learned counsel for the applicants contended that due to misunderstanding a complaint was lodged by the opposite party no. 2, Smt. Bhawna Arora against the applicants but no such incident took place as she was never harassed by the applicants, as such the complaint is liable to be quashed.
Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, contended that in the allegation it is clear that she was being harassed due to demand of dowry which could not be fulfilled. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, further contended that the prayer for quashing of summoning order of co-accused has already been quashed by this Court vide its order dated 11.12.2008, in Crl. Misc. Application No. 34840 of 2008.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the aforesaid prayer
Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants and nature of allegation. At this stage, in view of the fact, no interference is required. The version of the defence has to be examined at appropriate stage,
on the basis of evidence, in accordance with law.
Without expressing any opinion on merit, in view of the facts, if the applicants appear before the court concerned within three weeks from today and apply for bail, it is expected that the same will be considered and disposed off, expeditiously, in accordance with law, in view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Amarawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004(57) ALR-390 and by the Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (4) SCC 437, after giving opportunity to public prosecutor. If the bail application could not be decided on the same day then applicant no. 4 may be released on interim bail till disposal of the bail application.
With these observations, present application filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off.
Kishore
07 January 2014 at 13:03
I have query regarding a land.My grandfather has prepared a will and divided the properties to his two sons.one of them is my father.I am 32 years old and my father sold land without telling me.Since the properties are ancestral properties how to get my share .Can you guide me
ZAMEER RAZVI
07 January 2014 at 12:59
१९५९ में गवर्नमेंट ने हमारी जमीन अधिग्रहण कि थी जिसके बाद वो जमीन पर १९७० से आजतक कुछ भी काम उनके तरफ से किया गया. आज वो जमीन पड़क यानि के उस पर पिछले ४० सालो से खेती या फिर जिस उद्देश के लिए जमीन ली गयी थी वो कुछ भी नहीं किया गया और पिछले १० सालो से सीनियर डिवीज़न में हमारा मुक़दमा पेंडिंग है. कृपया करके आप हमे ये बताये कि जमीन वापस किस तरह से ली जाए। हमे मार्गदर्शन करे.
Sandeep Chauhan
07 January 2014 at 12:58
Dear Sir/Freinds,
I am Sandeep Chauhan, going to complete L.L.B in June 2014 , I want to go for Judiciary..
I am seeking help of all of you to clear the Judiciary Exam ...
Please let me know the best coaching Center in Delhi..
And it would be a great pleasure for me if any of you could provide me the study material and your valuable suggestions.
My email id is: s.chauhan9@gmail.com
Mobile No. : 09315550700
Thanx in anticipation
Sandeep Chauhan
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
educational
Is notary public a gazetted officer