aparna garg
11 June 2014 at 14:06
What is the basic point of difference between the term "accomplice" used under section 133 r/w 114 ii(b)and the term "co-accused" used under section 30 of the Indian Evidence Act,1872 ?
Or are they one of the same things.
Why Indian Evidence Act has used the word "accomplice", instead it could have used the word "approver" because if we go into depth of section 133 r/w 114 ill(b) it appears as if it is the accomplice ( or I have a doubt that ,can I use the word co-accused here ) who has turned approver, the evidentiary value of whom is actually in question .
Please help me in clarifying this concept through an example on these two terms.
Thanks in advance to our panel of experts.
Jitendra
11 June 2014 at 13:56
Hello Experts,
In short, Krishan Mathur has obtain a decree by playing fraud on court against three person 1. Jagdeesh 2. Devki Nandan and 3. Virendra Agarwal. Mathur mentioned that these three people is trying to I need your kind advise to let me know the ruling or judgments which says that a Decree is not binding on third party.acquire his land by forming foundation on his land and filed a suit in 1994. The suit was decreed in favor of Mathur in 2003.
The following observation were made
1. Mathur is really owner of the said land. Resolution: Court ne is point ko KALMJAD kiya hai.
Order: Defendants are advised not to interfere in the property on which Plaintiff is having his possession.
Krishan Mathur has filed an FIR (IPC 420,468,471,506,467 ) in 2007 on Shri Ram Chandra (third party) and other 7 people (third parties) whom Ram has sold out his ancestor's land.
There were 2 FRs (final reports) in favor of Ram were produced in the court but both got rejected in 2009 and All people have to serve prison for 7 days. The bail was granted on the point that the address/area of both properties Decree and the land sold by Ram does not match. Also the boundaries does not match. Since 2009 Mathur is delaying the case by getting absent, his lawyer is not well or lawyer is not ready blah blah. Now last year his statements are recorded and so far he has not shown any strong evidence which says both properties are same. And Mathur is the actual owner the property. Mathur has not also filed any case against the sale deeds made by Ram in 2004, 2006.
The case is still going on. I am looking here the following
1. Any ruling or order/judgments which says the Decree obtain by Krishan Mathur is not binding on Ram and others.
2. How to speed up the case.
3. Any other thing which could help Ram.
Thanks in advance and looking for your positive response.
regards
Jitendra
Senbagam mani
11 June 2014 at 11:05
I want to do International law, for tht wht should i do?
MANISH ASARKAR
11 June 2014 at 10:38
I would like to engage the private security gurads in my office establishment. please let me know the latest act applicbale for this in Maharashtra and do i need to register with the regulatory authority for this as a principal employer. if so, to whom should i approach for the registration. Thanks.
nlnaikhome
11 June 2014 at 10:14
Respected sir,
I am working in govt. organisation as scientific assistant in group c with GP 2400 and presently in probational period.
But before joining this services i had applied for other job also and in this regard i had intimated my current organisation.
I intimated 30 days after joining and after a duration of one month i got new govt. job as scientific asst.in other department with GP 4600, i have to under go training for 2 years.so, My Quarries are :
1. should i have to under go notice period before resignation in current organisation?
2. Since i will be in tanning for 2 years in new job ,there after they will give me appointment but i will need to sign bond before training So,Is this bond can be shown to my current organisation for resignation?
3.what procedures more i had to follow before resignation and joining new govt. job?
Kindly suggest me.
Talavane Krishna
11 June 2014 at 09:46
Dear sir,
My loan while NPA and in DRT has been assigned to JM financial under SARFAESI act Do I have the right to get a copy of the assignment deed. The JM financial has refused to give it. Bank has not responded. I have also applied under RTI.What is the law regarding this? how to get a copy?
My mail
talavane@gmail.com
Imran
11 June 2014 at 08:22
Hello Sir,
My friend is changing his religion from Hindu to Muslim.
He is going to apply for Bank exams. He need community certificate. Now he has OBC certificate. Generally Muslims also belongs to OBC .
So is it possible for him to get new community certificate ? Or can you please explain us the procedure.
Thanks in advance.
Vivek
11 June 2014 at 07:44
Hi There,
My wife filed a false allegations of dowry and asked for maintenance u/s 125 crpc in AFC. In the first stage of counselling she agreed her mistakes and wants to come back. But I insisted her to give in written about her mistakes so that she doesnt repeat and it becomes safe for me and my family.She agreed. My query is that, is there anything wrong legally by asking in written? Please oblige this query.
Thank you.
naveenraj jain
11 June 2014 at 07:31
Respected sirs
My friend entered into sale agreement with a buyer and received amounts via cash and DD.
Now that property got into litigation between seller's family after this sale agreement.
The buyer hesitated to register citing pendency of the suit. So it was agreed to return the sale consideration and was done by way of cash and DD.
The buyer did not get the original agreement papers but assured he will destroy them.
Prior to one day of completion of 3 years of sale date he has filed a suit for specific performance to gain by unlawfull means.
The litigation between the seller family is still pending
The DD repaid copies are with the seller and got hold of the buyer's bank statements as well clearly showing the payments received.
Is it not clear cheating and forgery
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
498a under 156(3)
my wife file a police complaint against 498a.
now the court order for FIR under 156(3).
I am attaching the order copy.
Please tell me the procedure of 156(3).
and should we go for AB.
When the FIR Launch police will arrest us immediately or after the investigation under 156(3)?
Shyam Lal