Decree is not binding on third party

Jitendra (Querist) 11 June 2014 This query is : Resolved
Hello Experts,

In short, Krishan Mathur has obtain a decree by playing fraud on court against three person 1. Jagdeesh 2. Devki Nandan and 3. Virendra Agarwal. Mathur mentioned that these three people is trying to I need your kind advise to let me know the ruling or judgments which says that a Decree is not binding on third party.acquire his land by forming foundation on his land and filed a suit in 1994. The suit was decreed in favor of Mathur in 2003.

The following observation were made

1. Mathur is really owner of the said land. Resolution: Court ne is point ko KALMJAD kiya hai.

Order: Defendants are advised not to interfere in the property on which Plaintiff is having his possession.

Krishan Mathur has filed an FIR (IPC 420,468,471,506,467 ) in 2007 on Shri Ram Chandra (third party) and other 7 people (third parties) whom Ram has sold out his ancestor's land.
There were 2 FRs (final reports) in favor of Ram were produced in the court but both got rejected in 2009 and All people have to serve prison for 7 days. The bail was granted on the point that the address/area of both properties Decree and the land sold by Ram does not match. Also the boundaries does not match. Since 2009 Mathur is delaying the case by getting absent, his lawyer is not well or lawyer is not ready blah blah. Now last year his statements are recorded and so far he has not shown any strong evidence which says both properties are same. And Mathur is the actual owner the property. Mathur has not also filed any case against the sale deeds made by Ram in 2004, 2006.

The case is still going on. I am looking here the following

1. Any ruling or order/judgments which says the Decree obtain by Krishan Mathur is not binding on Ram and others.

2. How to speed up the case.

3. Any other thing which could help Ram.

Thanks in advance and looking for your positive response.

regards
Jitendra

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Jitendra (Querist) 11 June 2014
I read this post and Mr prabhakar singh has written.

any decree binds only parties.so decree passed by lokadalat is binding between A and B alone and NOT on C.

http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/details.asp?mod_id=247326#.U5gSxGCKDIV

But I need ruling or judgments to support this.

Nadeem Qureshi (Expert) 11 June 2014
Dear Querist
You have to contact a lawyer personally in your area it will be better for you to know detail procedure.

Sankaranarayanan (Expert) 11 June 2014
yes i do stand with Mr Nadeem You consult local lawyer with all details

R.K Nanda (Expert) 11 June 2014
consult local lawyer.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 11 June 2014
Citation not provided in this section, consult your lawyer.

Guest (Expert) 11 June 2014
Search India Kanoon

Jitendra (Querist) 12 June 2014
Thanks all. We are in constantly touch with our lawyer and he says that your time did not come yet. It has been five years now. I don't know why he say so. God knows when will our time come.

thanks again!

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries