kayskhan
22 June 2014 at 11:15
Respected Sir An injunction /Eviction suit is pending before the Honb’le court since from 18 years waiting for justice.
The plaintiff is owner and possession of the house by virtual of sale deed dated 16-04-1996 same sale deed registered by sub registrar Srinagar the plaintiff become the absolute owner of the said property and a shop in its ground floor which had been in the rental possession of tenant.
That till date the tenant totally failed to pay the rent toward the land lord from the date of execution instead of paying rent toward plaintiff he filed fake suit of injunction against plaintiff and harassing without any cause of justification. The court asked for witnesses but tenant failed to call his whiteness applying tact’s of delaying and filed an application change the structure/Minor repair of said disputed shop in connection the both suits the principal judge directed an order the both suits heard jointly and posted same date that was just direction, and the present judge 2nd additional Munsiff passed orders the parties are same in the both suits suit of disposal let the both files be clubbed and warned to opposite side call the whole witness and don’t vaste the time of court now the opposite side filed an transfer application diarizes to front of disst. Judge the application is submitted as under the honble court of 2nd add. munsiff instituted separately that the suits have been consolidated by honbl’e court vide order the 2nd munsiff proceeding twice week in rush to dispose of the matter seems to surpass the interest of land lord/plaintiff.
My question is can the disst. Judge permitted/accept this kind of application for transfer because they blaming on Munsiff 2nd additional the high court order is passed if the old cases are pending before the court of law finished whole them and what can do our counsel for this matter if any order passed by delhi court/high court please gudie us that will be your's most kind ness
A K THAKUR
22 June 2014 at 11:06
Sir,
I Dr .A K.Thakur , joined CGHS ,Patna on 17.06.2005 , through CMSE EXAM 2002 conducted by UPSC.
2. As per existing rule I should have been promoted to Senior Medical Officer , after completion of four year of service . But for unknown reason notification of my promotion came on 26 th march 2014, almost five year late for no reason conveyed to me.
3. In 2013 I became aware of another fact that one doctor who joined CGHS one week(on 24.06.2005, Exam Batch Cmse 2003) after me has been given promotion to SMO in 2009 itself.
4. vide order dated 26.03.2014 issued under the signature of M.K.Sharvar, Under Secretary to the Government of India in which a list of Medical Officers have been issued granting promotion to the grade of Senior Medical Officers in Pay Band 3 in the scale of Rs. 15600-39100 plus Grade Pay of Rs. 6600/- with retrospective dates as per their eligibility and entitlement. In the said list, my name figures at Sl. No.3 and I have been granted promotion with effect from date 04.04.2009. I further submit that, on
04.04.2009 I was very much there in CGHS, Patna and I was discharging my duty satisfactorily.
5.with effect from 05 th February, 2014 I am on study (duly sanctioned by ministry) leave in Patna itself.
6.In this connection When I contacted Additional Director, Central Government Health Scheme,Patna for my Pay Fixation and Release of Arrear amount from 04.04.2009 till 05.02.14 , they said that this will be done only after three year ,when I will return after completion of my study leave.
Since my promotion is from back date my queries are:
1.whethere I am eligible to draw my arrear and upgrade pay immadiately or not ,i.e right now?.
2. whethere the period spent on study leave (in case of medical officer of chs)is recokned for earning leave as it is recokned for railway emplyoee.
Jayendra
22 June 2014 at 08:23
I wish to complain about the job hours and the working days following by my company. I have been a part of the organization since a long time back. We have to do 6 working days and which consists 9 hours (Half an hour Lunch Break) working hours per day and most of the time have to do stretch without paying overtime.
Please advise!
MC Sachdev
22 June 2014 at 07:57
My brother and his wife are no more and did not have any children and were residents of Mumbai.During their lifetime they purchased two adjacent studio apartments in a housing Society in Borivali from a builder directly and converted into one flat.One studio apartment was on my brother's name and the other was on his wife's name .My brother and I also opened a joint account and I put some money in the account to help my brother to purchase the said property.My brother died soon after the purchase and my mother in the house to help his widow.Later,she was replaced by my brother's widow by her father.We did not raise any issue so that my brother's widow life remains comfortable and to maintain family harmony. About four year's back she too died (my brother's widow).Her father/her brothers /sister/nephews have taken over all her and my brother's property ,they state the their daughter(my brother's widow ) has willed all the property to her father and her father on being approached several times refuses to show her WILL or discuss the property details.The property includes real estate,bank accounts,car,family jewellery ,terminal proceeds from the Company she worked for,etc.We have no knowledge and hold no papers of the belongings of my late brother and his wife,everything is held by her father.Suitable advice on the subject and the services of a professional are welcome,kindly communicate.My mother is 97 years old and is still living,,however she is unable to communicate due to dementia and ill-health.We are at Pune..Regards
Balasubramanian
22 June 2014 at 06:42
In a land dispute suit (Regular suit) the defendant had signed consent terms with the petitioner along with the members of his family,the family members were not parties to the suit,in fact it was suggested by the advocate for the Defendant to include other family members as signatories in consent terms before the Judge,so that they don't harass the petitioner filing unnecessary court cases after receiving compensation.The Judge in her order found the consent terms not in order and passed an order saying the consent terms inappropriate,now the defendant even after receiving the compensation as per agreed terms refuses to come to the court again for filing fresh consent terms as the property price has gone up and is blackmailing.The petitioner and defendant were properly identified by their respective lawyers before the Judge,with their Signatures affixed on the Consent terms when it was filed before the Judge.The petitioner has a stamped receipt for the compensation paid to the defendant.
now what is the remedy left for the Petitioner?to get a proper Decree!
Balasubramanian
22 June 2014 at 06:35
In a land dispute suit (Regular suit) the defendant had signed consent terms with the petitioner along with the members of his family,the family members were not parties to the suit,in fact it was suggested by the advocate for the Defendant to include other family members as signatories in consent terms before the Judge,so that they don't harass the petitioner filing unnecessary court cases after receiving compensation.The Judge in her order found the consent terms not in order and passed an order saying the consent terms inappropriate,now the defendant even after receiving the compensation as per agreed terms refuses to come to the court again for filing fresh consent terms as the property price has gone up and is blackmailing.The petitioner and defendant were properly identified by their respective lawyers before the Judge,with their Signatures affixed on the Consent terms when it was filed before the Judge.The petitioner has a stamped receipt for the compensation paid to the defendant.
now what is the remedy left for the Petitioner?to get a proper Decree!
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
21 June 2014 at 23:42
is it mandatory before lodging any complaint against the trustee the prior permission have to be taken from charity commissionar (particullary offence of indian penal code )
Iswar
21 June 2014 at 23:41
Hi,
I had purchased a flat in 2009.
CIDCO transfer of the building had done in the same period so my flat also in the name of previous owner.
Till Now Conveyance deed is pending .
Due to pending of conveyance deed i am not able to do CIDCO transfer in my name from the previous owener.
1.What should i do for CIDCO transfer.
2.how can i be a member of the society.
VISHAL
21 June 2014 at 22:09
My aunt has relinquished her (50%)share in the property to my father by executing relese deed (without receving any consideration)to make my father sole owner of the property now we are going to sell this property and we wish to give 5 % of the selling amount to her so how we should setlle this legally i.e which legal document we should make which will safegaurd our wish?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ancestral property
Dear Sir,
My mother has other three sisters. when my Nana's health was degrading that time beacause of the availabilty of only three sister he made a sale deed by paying the duty. and that time it was verbaly decided that the fourth sister will be joined in the property after she is available.soon after the Nana died. now when the fourth sister is available the one out of the three sisters is not allowing her to join the name in the said farm land property which is purely ancestral one. kindly show us the way to get the right of the 4th sister in the ancestral property.