Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

prasad sankpal   21 July 2014 at 15:47

Land dispute

The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms which are only between the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.x
and Y (out of 15 respondent). The consent terms are merely taken on record and marked.

Dear sir/Madam.
my question is 'If One of the respondent representative given written consent with keeping residence of building in dark or without taking prior approval from the residence ,then what course action left with residence ?

Mahesh RV   21 July 2014 at 15:06

Refund of security depsoit

WE HAD A LADY BUSINESS PARTNER IN THE FIRM AND BUSINESS PARTNER COMMITED SUICIDE AND WRITTEN THAT FOR HER DEATH HIS HUSBAND IS RESPONSIBLE .

BUSINESS PARTNER AS DEPOSITED SOME AMOUNT AS SECURITY DEPOSIT , NOW THE COMPANY WANT TO REFUND THE AMOUNT , WHAT DOCUMENTS SHOULD THE GUARDIAN PERSON SHOULD PROVIDE TO GET REFUND TO BUSINESS PARTNER SON WHO IS MINOR

Harish Kumar   21 July 2014 at 14:30

Nomination on death compensation

Dear Sir

My brother in law has died one month back and he nominated his sisters prior to his marriage who was unmarried on that time but got married before brother in law's marriage. My sisterms name is not there in the service book of organisation.Now brother in law's sisters putting claims against death compensation and unofficially we have been asked to provide succession letter from court and even pension is not starting till we submit the same Is it necessary to get the certificate. Can pension be started by office (BSNL) even without submitting succession certificate

SHIESTA007   21 July 2014 at 14:20

Parking problem in appartment

Dear Team,

Problem has errupted in the appartment on account some owners parking their car inside the appartment when the appartment owners are allowed to park only single two wheeler for each flat owners. But inspite of this some owners who have car in common have come together and bullying the rest of the other owners and not agreeing to park the cars outside the appartment.

Many times in the flat owners meeting it is been asked to the members who own the car to park outside the appartment but still then the car is parked inside the appartment.

Hence kindly guide as to what steps should the rest of the members take to put the cars outside? where should we give complaint? and what all necessary steps should be taken care before filling the complaint.

ganesh   21 July 2014 at 14:08

Ancestral & self-acquired property

Hi All,

I am having the following Queries..

(a)If a person got property from his Father's Ancestral Property through WILL.Then whether the property to that person becomes Ancestral property or Self-Acquired property??

(b) If a person got property from his Father's Ancestral Property through GIFT.Then whether the property to that person becomes Ancestral property or Self-Acquired property??

(c)If a person got property from his Father's Ancestral Property through PARTITION .Then whether the property to that person becomes Ancestral property or Self-Acquired property??

Thanking You all.....

SSng Aulakh   21 July 2014 at 13:57

Save guard your self against errant lawyers

Sir,
Advocates are officers of the court / Regulators and Guardian of law.

However, some of them under pressure/money/greediness join the opposite party and try to overpower the litigant's mentally using dirty tactics which can be deterrent to one's health.

Rohit_talukdar   21 July 2014 at 13:03

Evidance of video by spy cam

Dear Experts,

As stated earlier one of my friend "X" is charged with us 376/417. As per complain the incident happened in February'2012. Now one friend of victim girl named as sushmita (name changed) contacted my friend "X". Sushmita is also friend of "X" through VG and sushmita told my friend that

i) VG already had long affair (for 10 years upto 2013) with some other boy named Raja (name changed).

ii)"X" asked her that how did she knew about the fact. Sushmita told that she new Raja very well. Also Raja always talk with Sushmita and whatever happened between Raja & VG, VG always told to Sushmita.

iii) Also VG has illicit relationship (everything except intercourse) with one married man who was VG's school friend.

iv) Again "X" asked about the authenticity. Sushmita replied one incident was happened in front of her.

v) Sushmita is very friend with VG from childhood. VG is sushmita's neighborhood.

vi)Sushmita also told that she had not given any statement (us 161) before police against "x". But Police made false us-161 statement and made her on of the prime witness.

vii) sushmita also told that both VG & VG's mother are money hungry that's why they asked for 15 lacs rupees to withdraw the case.

viii) Sushmita also told that from the beginning whenever VG met "X" she always was with VG. There was no boyfriend & girlfriend relationship and there was no commitment of love.

ix) As stated by Sushmita "VG fabricated this complain only to marry my friend as my friend is well educated person & an enginner but her actual lover is poor and will not be able to fulfill VG's demand".

x) Above statement also confessed by VG to sushmita.

Now the above conversation is video recorded by my friend "x". "X" is asking me whether this video can be put as a evidence against VG's complain before court during trial?

Please suggest

Whether above video will be considered for acquittal?

rupinder   21 July 2014 at 12:40

Tax relaxation

Hi,
I want to deposit 10 lac's in my father account for foreign study purpose. My father is working agriculture. Pls let me know that how we can save from tax.we want to deposit as FD for year. Is there any way that we can save through form J. or ant other procedure.

regards
rupinder

malathi sharma   21 July 2014 at 12:03

Gift deeds and subsequent joint ownership

Sir,
A is the sole owner of a plot of land. He awards one-third of his plot as a gift to his sister with following conditions in the gift deed: (1) Either of the two partners can sell his/her share of the property only to the other partner and not to anybody else.
(2) Both the partners will always use the property jointly and will never partition it.

My questions are: (1) Is it possible to execute a gift deed with these conditions. If yes, would it still be called a “gift” deed.
(2) Would such conditions in the gift deed prevent both A and B from selling the plot jointly to a third person C. To sell their plot to C should they do something like this: first A sells his share to B. B then sells the entire plot to C and distribute the money among themselves.
(3) Few years later, A argued that since he was the executant of the gift deed and also he was the sole owner of the plot earlier, so the above conditions will be assumed to have been imposed by him, so he can always revoke the restrictions and sell his share to a third person C, in spite of his sister not wanting him to do so. Will the court allow A to do so.
(4) Suppose Mr. A died and D was his class I (or Class II ) heir. Can D overrule the above conditions and sell his share to a third person E or partition the property, in spite of his aunt B not wanting him to do so, or D will also be bound by the above conditions in the gift deed.
(5) If the above property is not a plot but a flat , say a studio apartment. We know that a studio apartment can not be partitioned or if partitioned will not be habitable. How will the court decide one-third of a studio apartment. If the property is a studio apartment, would it still be necessary to include the second condition above (about partition) in the gift deed to prevent the partners from partitioning the flat. How will the court allow to partition the studio apartment?
(6) Please advise how should A and B execute the gift deed to prevent each other from selling their shares separately to third persons or even partition the property .
Please answer all the questions.

sridhar pasumarthy   21 July 2014 at 12:00

Probative value of entries in bank pass book

Respected Experts,

In a suit for specific performance of agreement of sale, I am appearing for defendant. Plaintiff is trying to prove his case by filing Bank Pass Book containing entry of withdrawal of amount, which was alleged to have been advanced to defendant as advance sale consideration on the date of alleged sale agreement.

Every account holder of a bank possesses a pass book in his custody. There is every possibility to manipulate the entries easily.

My queries are :-

1. Are the entries in Bank Pass Book come under the head of primary evidence?

2. Are they admissible in evidence without examining the person who made those entries in pass book?

3. Can I object to its marking?

Please give your valuable replies.

Thanks in advance.