shalu
14 August 2014 at 21:14
My query is if four sisters have signed a document in favour of brothers stating no claim on it.property is not yet sold , can it be reversed? As 1 of the sister wants to withdraw from it.and its been 10 years almost.
anupam sharma
14 August 2014 at 19:19
Vide a will of person, his wife, two sons and one daughter had each equal share viz 25% in one three storyed house. One brother dies nad his wife after getting her 25% share transferred in her name , sells the house at Chandigarh where partition by metes and bounds is not allowed. Such 25% of her share of the described house was sold without getting her share determined by Competent Authority/Court and put the purchaser in possession of whole first floor and one parking garage (i.e. excess of her share). What can be done by other shareholders now, besides filing suit for partition? Can sale deed be cancelled as the third party was in notice of her share 25% in joint house?
Dear Professional Colleagues,
I have a small query:
An partnership firm was formed in Mumbai on August 01,2011. The stamp paper was dated July 27, 2011.
Subsequently , there had been admission of two more partners.
Accordingly new partnership deed was signed.
The stamp paper used for the new partnership deed was May 16, 2013 whereas it was effective from May 01, 2013.
Request your valuable advise as to whether the new partnership deed is valid & acceptable for all business purposes including opening of Bank Account.
Thanks in advance,
Regards//
Parag Shah
Seema
14 August 2014 at 17:43
There was a recent Delhi HC judgement stating that inlaws are not compelled to have their daughter-in-law stay with them if they do not wish, especially if it is a self bought house.
This has caused severe panic to my colleague who now apprehends being thrown out of her marital home. She got married into an upper middle class family 16 years ago and has been staying in her marital home ever since (owned by father-in-law). She became a widow one year ago and she realized after her husbands death that she had been left penniless (he had liquidated all their savings.) Now her inlaws want her and her 14 yr old daughter to leave, which will in effect make her a destitute as she has no where to go. Her case is already in court and she is asking the court to be allowed to stay in that house for the safety of her minor daughter and herself. But going by this judgement, she can be on the streets tomorrow. The lady is living in Kolkata. How does this judgement affect her? Please advise.
Govt has issued a notification in Sept'12 for acquisition of RIGHT OF USE of our land for the purpose of laying their pipeline for gas. Actual work has not commenced on the project as yet. I am advised that they will give us compensation being 10% of the govt guideline value of the land area being utilised for such pipeline while theoritically, land will continue to remain ours, and we will be allowed to keep using it for agricultural purposes only.
Meanwhile, new land acquisition law has been enacted in 2013 offering 2/4times the market value as compensation and necessitating consent of 80% people.
My question is, will this new law be applicable to our case? Will they need consent of 80% people to take of LAND USE and lay their pipeline? Will they be obliged to pay 2/4 times the market value as compensation for land so acquired?
Kindly advise.
pushpakrishna
14 August 2014 at 16:43
Dear Experts,
A owes (borrowed) Rs.1,00,000/- from B and Rs.2,00,000/- from C.A is having a house worth Rs.5,00,000/- B filed a suit for recovery of amount and got an attachment before Judgement for Rs.1,00,000/- now C wants file a suit for recovery of the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- and wants have an attachment before judgement of the house mentioned above. can court consider the same? as the house already attached for Rs.1,00,000/- of course the House worth is Rs.5,00,000/- .kindly give me the suitable advice for the attachment before judgement in respect of the C. Thank you in advance
It is understood that Treasury Department which is under mandatory Scrutiny of Auditor General of India.
Can we make a RTI Application to the Auditor to verify a particular entry in a Particular Treasury Record/Register and furnish information relating to it. The Register in question contains data from the year 1956 till date. I need the data of the year 1956.
My query is Since the Auditor is duty bound to Audit can he under RTI Act furnish the information requested by me.
I want to approach the Auditor because I am doubtful whether the Treasury Department will give correct and true information.
Thanks in advance.
Dinesh
14 August 2014 at 15:37
Dear Experts,
I want to nominate my wife for our house. I want to know if I can write in the nomination form separately that in the event of my death and that of my wife , the share, title and intrest should go to my son. In the nomination form, I want to nominate the full property for my wife and only on her death for my son. Is it ok to write on a ready printed nomination form a handwritten note to nominate my son in the vent of death of both myself and my wife. My son is a minor currently.
Thanks in Advance for your expert opinions.
Hi Experts,
I am planning to file an execution U/S 25 and 27 of Consumer Act for enforcement of an order passed by the District Redressal forum.
I made an application under sec 25 and 27, but the reader in District forum is saying to include only section 27 of Consumer protection act in execution petition, so that the other party pays my money in a rapid manner because of fear of arrest.
My query is if i file u/s 27 and draft my prayer as per section 27 of CP act then judge may issue warrant and in that case will he be able to take BAIL or stay for Arrest from State or National Commission ?. Pls guide me on this point.
Other query is if i do not include sec 25 and files under 27 only, then will judge be able to pass recovery orders after selling Opposite party's property/bank accounts ?
Pls. guide me how shall i proceed i.e. should i include both the sections in same application or not.
Evidence act
if the prosecutor purposefully hides any evidence, under what provision can defence press charges against prosecution??