shivam
19 September 2014 at 16:00
Dear all,
My elder sister who stays with us with her husband and draws a salary of Rs.30000/- around and her husband who is a property dealer and a owner of a tata sumo and also his mother's property,are saying that we[our elder sister and her husband] have every right to stay in our parent's house lifelong though both are earning handsomely per month.Our parent's property is in their name.My question to you all are...
1) What does Indian law and Hindu marriage act say about this?
2)What is the supreme court and West Bengal High court direction's are as we stay in W.B in this matter?
3)If my father says that his daughter and her husband will stay with me and if my mother says "no" to it then what is the solution as both are the co-owner of the property.
PLEASE HELP..
preet anjan
19 September 2014 at 15:07
Two hindus got married in a temple .several years and after the birth of three choldren,they get marriage registered under special marriage act . a year later husband claims that certain ceremonies were not perform and hence the marriage was void decide after giving argument. whether this marriage valid or void ?
advocate jeevan kumar
19 September 2014 at 14:58
the workmen filed a complaint against the employer for throwing out the workmen from the factory working for last 5-6 years. during the pendancy conciliation proceeding before labour officer the employer sent a notice to workmen to join duty stating the workmen is absent for past many days.
what is the legal effect of this notice
Goapl Garg
19 September 2014 at 14:21
A tenant is staying in a flat for last six months after excuting a proper Tenancy Agreement under Tenancy Act and pays Rent regularly.Now a Bank has approached him for securing the possession of the Flat as the flat had been under their Mortgage by the Owner of the Flat who is defaulter in repayment to Bank.The Bank says it has served the notice to the owner under sarfasi. What is the status of the Tenant under this circumstances?
Goapl Garg
19 September 2014 at 14:12
We have an HUF with my Husband as its Karta and we three others, wife+major daughter+major daughter as its members/coparceners. The karta(only male member) has expired.we hold shares worth 15 Lac in our Depository Account which need to be traded by the same HUF account with a new Karta, but apart from other formalities, the DP Participant prescribes that:"An Appropriate Order from a Competent Court" but the DP Participant is not able to clarify it in details, but insist that this is per guidelines of NSDL.
We require help about the nature of the order and the designated court from whom we should seek this order.Is Succession Certificate is meant here, but is it applicable in case of HUF..? Thanks & Regards.
stefen Ronald
19 September 2014 at 14:06
Thank you sir....................................................
stefen Ronald
19 September 2014 at 13:56
..............................................................................................................................
sunil
19 September 2014 at 13:08
sir,
i am maharashtra state government employee.i have two kods(boys). state government rule not allow third child.our family wants girl child. is it possible. what could be disciplinary action if we will take chance? does maharashtra gov will give any relaxation for third child as girl ? is their any progress in below attached news from TIMES OF INDIA.
It may be OK to have 3rd child, only if it's a girl
Sharad Vyas, TNN | Oct 4, 2011, 04.24AM IST
MUMBAI: Four decades ago, India was introduced to the government plea—Hum Do Hamare Do (We Two, Our Two), Horn Ok Please—through highway trucks. The state government now plans to rethink the campaign, and incentivize the birth of a third child—but only if it is a girl. The idea is to narrow the state's child sex ratio, among the worst in the country at 883 girls for every 1,000 boys. The national average is 914:1,000.
The proposal will soon come to the cabinet. It seeks to reward couples who give birth to a third child, a girl, by taking care of her education and giving other financial rewards on the lines of those being offered under the Rajmata Jijau Malnutrition Free Maharashtra programme. The existing laws will be tweaked to ensure government employees or elected representatives at all levels, including the gram panchayats, are not disqualified for giving birth to a third girl child.
Senior Mantralaya officials on Monday convened a meeting on effective implementation of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act (PC-PNDT). A consensus was achieved on introducing the new changes as part of a new proposal for amendment which will be forwarded to the cabinet soon, said officials attached to the chief secretary's office. "We all agreed that if the third child is a girl child, it could be safely assumed the couple did not go for a prenatal sex selection," said a senior official confirming a need to strengthen the information network to curb the practice of prenatal sex selection, increasingly being embraced in remote parts of the state. An awareness campaign will be launched in the seven worst-affected districts of the state soon, he said.
PRATIK DEBROY
19 September 2014 at 12:32
there is dispute between two faction of members of a self help group which is registered under societies act, 1860. some of the members were declared as strangers due to their non repayment of loans which they availed from the society. As such the Secretary bought a civil suit and the lower court declared them as strangers. Now these members filed an appeal in the district court to declare the decree of the lower court as illegal and without any merit.
this SHG has an account with a PSB bank. as such the secretary has written a letter to the Branch manager to allow the SHG to operate the account. but the respondents informed the Branch manager that they have filed an appeal in the district court and requested not to allow the operation of the accounts until final disposal. in the mean time the secretary has filed a complaint before the Banking Ombudsman. please suggest.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Compromise or giving up a case to the opponent after selling the land to third party
Sir
One persion the fisrt party sold some acres of land by making a layot to many innocent buyers of plots concealing a civil dispute over ownership in court with a second party and a criminal case filed by the second party over selling the plots by first party and on the first party alone.Now all the plots sold.Now the seller,the first party is in agreement with the second party p with whom he has dispute in court.My doubt is If the above seller of plot the fisrt party cleared the case on geting amount of money from the second party in favour of the second party,what will be the position of the third party ,the innocent buyers of plot who is having possession and who is not party to the case and who are not issued any notice and are not complained in police. Is there any right to the third parties to file a civil case again for their rights against the second party.
Faithfully
Thangaraj