Chand Singhania
22 October 2014 at 12:06
Dear Experts,
Case history:
It is MCD, both agreed mutually.
In divorce agreement it has been specified that child aged 3 years will be staying with mother as she is a state govt. school teacher and has good earning and will meet the father whenever the child want and father and other family members can also meet the child. Father have to bear the educational expense of the child. It has been agreed by both the parents, paper signed and the divorce case is going on in court. Both husband and wife gone to magistrate and 2 hearings has been done. Magistrate asked to think again on the decision of separation as per rules and have asked to meet again after few days. That will be 3rd hearing. Now the wife is saying that she do not want to keep the child with her, the child should stay with the father. But the father do not want to keep the child as he stays out of India almost 15-20 days a month due to professional life.
Query:
1. Is it possible to change the statements of divorce paper at this point of time?
2. Is the wife can stop the divorce process by raising this point inspite of agreeing earlier, after signing the paper and attended 2 hearing before magistrate?
3. Mother being a govt employee and father being a professional who have to stay outside India in different countries all the year around, court will ask to keep the child with whom, Father or Mother? age of the child is 3 years and Father do not want to keep the child also with him due to the reason given above.
Sameer
22 October 2014 at 11:08
Dear Experts
Please guide as how to proceed in case where reward awarded by consumer forum but not given within mentioned period by OP.
If possible kindly share or supplement any draft or guidelines for filling application to get appeal effect
Thanks in Advance
i was terminated by management of unaided private school in 2013 and i took stay from court and still on duty. On the occasion of diwali every staff member of our school is honoured by some cash and sweets by management. they are not honouring me for last two years. in 125 staff members only i was who not honored.
so they insulted me in entire staff
can i file maan hani case in court for this and for which amount
anrban
22 October 2014 at 10:39
REGARDS
Sir,
My query is that,
A person wanted in a criminal case has been successful to be granted ANTICIPATORY BAIL allowed by the vacation bench of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court. The bench was a two Judges Bench.
Department is on to cancel the said anticipatory bail. Kindly show me the way to do so...
This is Urgent, please someone help, because diverging opinions are coming from the part of the Ld.Advocates...
shreekanth
22 October 2014 at 10:17
Hi, i am looking to purchase an agriculture land in mandya, karnataka. i am working for a private company since 3 years and my salary is around 2 lakhs per annum. i have not filed IT even once till now as my salary is less. since in karnataka there is a law that only agriculturists can purchase farm land, my question to you is 1. how do i prove that my grandfather was a farmer? my maternal grandfather is passed away and he owned some agri land which was sold a decade ago.
sam
22 October 2014 at 10:04
Greetings,
We stay in small C.H.S. having 8 members Building was constructed in late 1990s. Since last 4 year, I had tried to get Conveyance of Society and we also appointed professional to get it. Initially he told us that it will be matter of 3 months.
However existing builder did not gave response and after 1 1/2 year, we had to get our money back from professional as he failed to get our Conveyance.
Now old builder have sold redevelopment/Conveyance and other rights to another builder. Who wants us to sign MOU for redevelopment with him, then only he will allow us to get Conveyance.
Chairman of society is showing extra interest to sign MOU with builder without following any following procedures Bye laws or GR on redevelopment of 03-01-2009.
Though I being secretary tried to explain terms and legal proceedings and other legal/Technical terms, in SGM 6 members out of 8 members have agreed to for redevelopment and sign MOU.
Que.1> How can we (opposing 2 members - including secretary) get court/registrar/legal assistance like stay or so.
Que.> What is Court Fees and other Legal Charges to get legal assistant in Mumbai.
Thanks in advance.
vinaykala
22 October 2014 at 08:47
dear sir,
my mother willed me the second UNCONSTRUCTED floor of a house at delhi, gf to elder brother and f floor to younger brother.
at that time mcd did not allow more than two and a half stories.
my mother wrote in the will about me , the executor, 'his judgement shall be final on all matters pertaining to the house' while concludeing the 'Immovable prop' part of the Will.
Now that mcd has allowed more floors , I have claimed before delhi high court that second floor upto sky belongs to me.
this is challenged by the brothers.
please advise:-
any case laws in the past that have dealth with such issues wheere roof rights are given but subsequently one can as per bye laws add more floors ?
vinay kala
oct 22,14
Dear All,
In a partition suit, there were two types of properties revenue and town properties, The suit was preliminary decree in 1960, later final decree proceeding started in 1987, the court appointed municipal commissioner to divide town properties and sent record to respective tahsildars to divide revenue properties.
The part of the final decree proceedings and execution of properties with respective town properties is fully completed in 1993 and respective possession is also given to decree holders, but the other part of final decree with respect to only revenue properties is also completed in 2011 but some of parties preferred appeal and is still pending.
Question: As all decree holders of that suit have died, Some of the decree holder heirs who has joint possession of town properties with their other
coheirs wants to divide properties among themselves, since there was dispute for division, they have filed a seperate partition suit to divide town properties only, but the trial court has rejected or barred the suit under order 2 rule 2 cpc stating the other suit for revenue properties which is still pending in appeal, go and lay your claim in that suit,but we had already had filed an Interlocutary application in the FDP court in 2009 but it rejected it stating shares of heirs of decree holders will not be determined by this FDP court, here heirs are in this suit only to represent the decree holders since they are dead.
Is the trial court right in dismissing our partition suit as our claim at present was only to divide the town properties which are in joint possession and the other suit which is pending in appeal is only for revenue properties which we have not included in this new partition suit plaint.
If so or we have to wait till that suit in appeal has to complete to divide our properties it almost 20 years since the town properties are in joint possession.
We are preferring an appeal over this order, as the trial court has barred our partition suit after stage of issues itself.
Thanks
Ali
Respected Seniors!
on the appearance of Accused in 138 NI Act, The Magistrate ordered to furnish 5000/- one surety and after taking that FDR from Adv. Mutually aided Society, on the next date of hearing the same was lost and the person who stood as surety is having the xerox for the same. now what can i do to get the original?
please advice. urgent.
thanking all the seniors.
Regards,
Aditya.
Deed or agreement of land sale
You see i have sale my land and the purchaser have sole it back, so i bought it back my land which i have sale, so any one can help me a drafting deed/agreement in this regards.
Thank you