Kumar
10 November 2014 at 12:28
Hi Experts, My Dv act is in cross-exam stage.Since my wife is delaying the withdrawal of case, i have to proceed the case with minimum damage. Shall i cross exam the IO (protection officer) before my wife cross-exam? I want to file witness summon (311) to my in-laws and cross-exam them, Shall i do in this stage? When i gave crpc 91 petition for her employer notice, Judge said file this on my evidence stage.
is this right stage (cross-exam) to file witness summon?
anamika
10 November 2014 at 12:24
Respected experts wish to know either there is any law under Hindu custom to get remarried during separation time of a boy with his old first wife.
prerna
10 November 2014 at 12:05
Dear sir,
I have property owned in my name and same is mortaged to bank under my name and the emi for the same is paid by me. My tenant who has been residing in my house is not vacating and asking of some money paid to my husband as a loan which i was not aware of. Me and my husband don't live together. the rent agreement doesn't talk about the loan and also loan agreement was done b/w my husband and the other party. we have send him one month notice for eviction in which he revealed this information about the loan. he has also not paid rent and says rent has been adjusted for the interest for loan. Rent for the house is 13500.please tell me chances of this property getting through court and will i get all the rent arrers
Abhinay Kumar Shaw
10 November 2014 at 11:59
I have booked a flat in the year 2012 on the 5th Floor which has not been sanctioned yet as because the building has got sanctioned for G+3.
I have made the payment almost 50% of the Purchase Consideration and the Promoter has authorise me to take the possession against the part performance and we did the Griha Pravesh on last month but now again the promoter has locked the Flat and with their Locks along with ours.
Now please guide me what to do or what steps should I take.
KETAN J SHAH
10 November 2014 at 11:17
Respected Sir,
I M the landlord of a property in Mumbai.One of my tenants who is a nursing home and the occupier is the director of this nursing home. In 2002 a suit was filed by me on the previous occupier who sold the property directly to the present occupier. But after persuing the case for 2 years we were forced to take back the suit. On this consent terms were filed. In this consent term there was a clause that the Tenant or the occupier will not carryout any additions/alterations except repairs to furniture, windows etc. However the occupier did not take cognigance of C S and carried out extensive illegal work .I filed a revised suit for this contempt of C S. I filed an application for inspection of suit premises which I was granted from Hon High Court. Now the stage of the suit is my cross is over. The occupier has taken measurements of his premises on his own without the permission of the court.He will bring this new plans to the court.
Now my question is wether a tenant who has done illegal work can take measurement of his premises without courts permission. Secondly when my cross is over will the court admit his plans and report of inspection which will be produced by him.I M the landlord of the premises then how can a tenant produce plans without my signature or consent or approval from the corporation.What action will the court take.
Please advice.
Thanking you in advance
sai anurag
10 November 2014 at 11:08
Hello Lawyers club India.
My name is Anurag.We are having a plot in a co-operative society in Hyderabad which is in legal issues since late 1980s.However we won in SC,HC.But the judgement in District court isn't in favour of us.The District court's website says like this
CASE STATUS-DISPOSED
CASE NATURE-Contested--DISMISSED WITH OUT COSTS.
I'm unable to understand this.Please explain me this.Waiting for your earliest and kind reply
Thanks in advance
Anurag
HemalathaMysore
10 November 2014 at 11:02
Hello all,
I have a BBMP property at Bangalore which was jointly held by me and my unmarried brother. He has died 2 years back.
Now I want to sell that property. I was told that that my brother's share of the property will go to my mother as my father is not alive.
Now to do the khata transfer to my mother's name I was told Letter of Administration is required. But in the list of documents needed for khata transfer mentioned by BDA they have not specified the need for Letter of Administration.
Can experts please tell me if Letter of Administration is essential for khata transfer or not. Does khata transfer to my mother's name enable me to sell the property. If not, what do I need to do, Kindly let me know.
Regards,
Hemalatha
jagjit
10 November 2014 at 10:44
SIR, I WANT TO KNOW THAT WHAT IS WITNESS DISCHARGE. AND WHAT HAPPENED IF ANY WITNESS REPEATEDLY TOLD BY COURT TO GIVE HIS CROSS EXAMINATION AND HE DELAYING THE CROSS EXAMINATION.
Sameer
10 November 2014 at 10:39
A partnership firm converted in to the Pvt. ltd in the year of 1984.one directors was the issue less and were main founder of the original partnership firm, A arbitration proceeding was going on with semi government establishment,arbitration order awarded in the favor of this pvt. ltd firm in year, appeal was filed against this order but the same was dismissed in the year of March 2003 by the high court,In this case too no payment is made by firm to the deceased wife till now , although her late husband was the main working director of the firm please guide how can deceased wife get justice.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Right to agriculture land for daughters in uttrakhand
Dear sir,
By Hindu Succession Act (39of 2005),S.6,wife if alive and daughters have equal right on agriculture property as sons have, if father has expired without leaving any will.
Sir,I am resident of Uttarakhand State.we are two sisters and three brothers along with alive mother.My father has recently expired without leaving any will.After inquiry from Tehsil as well as advocates, they say girls have no right in father's agriculture property in Uttarakhand as well as U.P. from which it is bifurcated.
Sir,I would like to know is the above mentioned statement true?And if it is yes which act is applicable for it so that I could satisfy myself argumentatively.