Samanth kumar
15 May 2015 at 21:23
Good evening dear experts , one shedulled caste poor fellow is facing a lot of harassment from one rich fellow. Rich fellow is Dalit Christian belongs to BC caste. Is sc st atrocity act is applicable on BC Dalit converted Christians or not ? I asked two seniors One is telling aplicable, another one is telling not applicable. My advice to that man is go to SP office and give complaint. Please give your advice or suggestion sirs.
Vivek Laddha
15 May 2015 at 21:22
Whether the Indian societies can obtain loan from outsiders under the society registration Act?
What are the provisions relating to financial statements, its submission and audit?
Din Dayal
15 May 2015 at 21:18
A friend of mine expired recently leaving appx.5 lacs in his public provident fund account with Indiapost . The account matured earlier & is extended without fresh sub- scription.My friend has registered 3 nominees against this account(Wife,Son & Daughter). There is no will.My queries are -
1. As nominees live at different locations ,can they submit claims for payment of respective shares separately ? Indiapost is insisting that all nominees file claim together .This is not practical as one nominee is unable to come for next few months .Please advise correct rules. REGARDS
Din Dayal
15 May 2015 at 20:39
My friend owned a residential house jointly with his wife , in the state of Punjab.Recently he expired leaving his wife , a son and a daughter . He did not make any will.
My understanding is that , being a co-owner surviving spouse , the property devolves on the wife automatically .Is is correct?
If my understanding is correct , what will be the procedure for removing the name of deceased husband from the title deeds ? Please advise.Regards.
Anonymous
15 May 2015 at 20:06
My father owned a business and he expired a few weeks ago the premises is in mumbai maharashtra admeasuring 2500 sq feet approx can I get the landlord to transfer the bill in my name
D Nanda Kumar
15 May 2015 at 19:39
JGD
CHAPTER 1
1. Due to the filing of the case by CBI my result in the promotion process in 1993 was kept in sealed cover. Since such CBI cases are long drawn, a provision for giving adhoc promotion was introduced in 1993 as amendment to Promotion policy. As per the same, review committee is to be formed by the Chairman & Managing Director every six months to review cases more than 2 years old to consider giving adhoc promotion.
The action of the Bank in this regard and the inaction of the Chairman & Managing Director are as under:
Action Result Inaction (by CMD)
Note put up on 28.07.1995
& first committee formed Due to sudden demise of one of the committee members review was not done. NO INVOLVEMENT
Second committee was formed on 06.09.1995 and review was done on 30.11.1995 Note recommending adhoc promotion was submitted to CMD. Marked to “ED” and on “ED’s” transfer to another Bank the note is consigned to the records.
Third committee was formed on 15.06.1999. Step 1
The committee asked for details of the case from the Vigilance dept. & personnel dept. (Ref. Notes dated 13.06.2000, 29.07.2000) and reported to CMD vide note dated 24.08.2000.
CMD raised 3 queries viz. The present status, reason for Bank not taking action against me & how terminal benefits given to other Officer mentioned in the case etc. And made a remark as under:
ED may examine these points as well as other aspects of the long pending issue and put up with his comments at the earliest.
Step 2
On getting satisfactory report from Vigilance & Personnel departments the committee met on 13.09.2000 and a note dated 21.09.2000 recommending adhoc promotion was submitted to CMD.
Please discuss.
Step 3
Note explaining the process with due recommendation of the Chief Vigilance Officer put up on 20.10.2000.
Remark by CMD:
Did we make any specific reference to CBI in respect of Mr. Nandakumar (& Mr. Pushkar Raj) seeking No objection of the CBI for promotions to these Officers.
Step 4
Note dated 07.11.2000 was put up with reply to the query duly signed by GM (per.) & GM(Vig.) (that at the discretion of the Bank the Officers can be given adhoc promotion & that the CBI is not concerned with the internal decision of the Bank)
Remark by GM(Vig.):
As directed by Chairman to discuss the matter, I discussed the same with him on 23.11.2000. Based on the position obtaining up to date, it is considered that this could be re-examined at the time of the next Review of Sealed Covers Procedure or next promotion process.
Papers returned for the needful at Personnel Deptt. Pl.
(Needless to add that the CMD was to retire very soon & no review committee was formed in his tenure)
Fourth committee was formed and put up a note dated 18.06.2001 Recommended adhoc promotion from the date of signing of the note by CMD. There is no remark whatsoever on the note by the CMD based on the copy provided to me under RTI Act, 2005.
Fifth committee was formed by CMD on 20.12.2007.
(This is the last committee formed for review not only for my case but in general also although statutorily a review of all cases need to be done every six months) Step 1
The committee called for the personal information by letter dated 18.01.2008 regarding
1. Assignments and duties performed
2. Achievement of allocated targets,
3. Exemplary achievements outside the Bank, &
4. Overall performance.
On getting a very satisfactory report these for two decades of my service, the committee finalized the findings on 07.03.2008 recommending once again adhoc promotion.
The Chairman & Managing Director signed the report on 08.03.2008 with comments for discussion with Committee & General Manager (HR) (as per reply to my RTI query).
Note:
I was personally informed by the then GM (legal) who attended the said meeting that Chiarman & Managing Director voiced his concern as to how the person (myself) is tolerating the injustice for so long and not yet gone to court. The GM(Legal) &/or GM(Per) present was asked to personally convey his feelings to me (to go to court). It is once again needless to mention that the CMD was due for retirement in December, 2008 by which time no court decision is likely to come.
1. Based on the documents already obtained by me under RTI act 2005 I filed writ petition in the High Court of Bombay and obtained a judgement by the bench on 01.10.2008 directing the CMD to take a decision within 8 weeks. (Writ petition no. 1614 of 2008 http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1247211) . The same CMD had to act for a change.
2. The Chairman & Managing Director had also the privilege of reading the following remark in the said judgement which I feel is a personal remark calling for introspection:
“Even otherwise a duty is cast on the Respondents to act fairly. The petitioners’ case has not been reviewed in terms of the Regulations. Where a power is conferred on an authority, the authority conferred with the power has a corresponding duty to act and that too fairly.”
From the above it is clear that there is a dereliction of duty and gross denial of justice. The Bank released the adhoc promotion as per the judgement but not from the date of judgement as recommended in the note but from the date 24.11.2008 there by robbing me of any monetary benefits.
3. After getting the relief & after putting in a satisfactory service of 38 & odd years, I attained superannuation on 31.03.2010 and retired with full terminal benefits including pension.
CHAPTER 2
The case no. 6 of 1992 stands disposed off now and as per judgement dated 26.03.2014 I stand acquitted on merits. I have made claims on the Bank by letter addressed to the Chairman & Managing Director submitted on 16.07.2014 and thereafter sent reminders on 1.10.2014, 18.10.2014, 12.11.2014, 24.12.2014, 30.12.2014, 23.01.2015, 02.02.2015, 28.03.2015, 14.04.2015 and 28.04.2015 staking my claims for the following:
a. Release/regularization of adhoc promotion with notional date from the date of promotion
b. For considering my claim for future promotions denied to me by the Bank’s action/non action ,
c. Adequate monetary compensation from the Bank to mitigate the injustice, ignominy and mental agony as well as trauma I was put through by action & non action of the Bank
Representation dated 11.07.2014 and several reminders have been blatantly ignored despite my age (65 years) and health condition (Cancer Survivor).
Further, it is also mentioned in the said High Court judgement (mentioned in the first chapter) that “Needless to say that subsequently, if the Petitioner is exonerated or discharged or acquitted from the charges, the Petitioner’s promotion would be considered in terms of the rules in force pertaining to sealed cover procedure.
THE NON ACTION CONTINUES DESPITE THE ABOVE DIRECTION (WHICH ACCORDING TO ME TANTAMOUNTS TO CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDER).
Harish Wani
15 May 2015 at 17:33
If in Maharashtra (Navi Mumbai) factory owner appoint contractor and under that contractor 50 Mathadi workers are working for loading and unloading then which act is applicable for factory owner.
Thanks in Advance
Advocate M J
15 May 2015 at 16:53
Good Afternoon
Is a mortgage deed with registration is important to be entered between the borrower and the financial institution according to RBI and according to law
thank You
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cancellation of sale deed
Is cancellation of sale deed possible..?
My client purchased a land in 2014 bonafidely from Mr.A..and got it registered in his name..
Now through a civil suit my client comes to know that Mr.A has already sold the same land to Mr.B in 2010 and that document is also registered..
Now there is a compromise between my client and the first buyer i.e. Mr.B regarding the same land and he agreed that my client should keep the land..
Now is there any way that i could nullify the sale deed of 2010 and make the sale deed executed in favour of my client as genuine n bonafide..
Plz its an urgent matter..kindly help..