vandana bhandar
29 May 2015 at 15:25
MCMG has changed name of the party in the property tax assessment record without notice to the original party and without hearing the original party in the year 2005. Now I complained to the MCGM but it is not resolving my complaint by way of reinstating the name of the original party. The Mcgm is telling me to submit latest PR card to resolve the transfer of property matter. The answer given by the MCGM is irrelevant as my issue is not of transfer of property but to reinstate the name of the original party that was wrongly deleted from record on the basis of letter of a person who has no right over the property. Please guide what remedy I have against the MCGM
RITESH RANJAN
29 May 2015 at 15:22
Respected Jurists and Learned Experts,
Kindly help and provide me Judgment/s or case no. through which the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and / or the Hon’ble High Court/s they have quashed the DV Act on grounds of mutual compromise or permitted withdrawal of the DV Act case.
My mail id is – riturajgold@yahoo.co.in
I shall be ever grateful to you.
Thanking you,
– Ritesh Ranjan
Madhu Mittal
29 May 2015 at 14:17
To know effectiveness of bill no 151 of 2015
Respected Sirs,
I am enclosing copy of bill no. 151 of 2015 published in the Gazette of India dated 06.05.2015
Please let me know whether it is already effective from 06.05.2015 or yet to be effective from any other later date.
I could not attach the file here so I have attached it at http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/To-know-effectiveness-of-bill-no-151-of-2015-121698.asp#.VWgwJNKqqko
neha
29 May 2015 at 14:15
In a legal partnership of 2 partners, 1 partner died in June,2013. The alive partner made a dissolution deed in the next month, but legal heirs of deceased partner didn't signed the same. Legal heirs also got some nominal amount as standing credit to the deceased partner's capital A/c. Alive partner continued the same business as a proprietory, without giving any heed to legal heirs of deceased.
In this case, what about the share of deceased partner in assets of the firm & his liabilities?
Without any dissolution deed can alive partner continue the business in his own name?
What procedure should legal hairs of deceased partners follow now, for their rights & share in assets of the firm?
kajal
29 May 2015 at 11:39
sir/madam,
i am wife and i filed case for restitution as per sec 9 of Hindu act and my husband file in reply sec 13 for divorce .
our both application are dismissed .
as i m not have any advocate i am fitting my case by my own the reason given for dissmissed my application is like
"find that the respondent has dropped
the petitioner-wife at her father's place on 2.4.2011. Since then
there is no move to bring her back. As the petitioner-wife has
conducted this matter in-person in spite of several suggestions
from the Court to engage a lawyer, she has done a great job
though she recorded lengthy pleadings and cross-examination.
However, she has not been able to bring on record the relevant
evidence pertaining to her case of restitution of conjugal rights,
as contemplated under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,
1955. She has given all possible dates and events. However,
she has failed to state the date of her final separation from the
respondent-husband. Therefore, I cannot gather as to what
exactly transpired on 2.4.2011. Even the said date is available
from her father's evidence. As already expressed by me earlier,
her father's evidence is an improvement of her case. When the
petitioner herself, a highly educated lady has failed to describe
the events of her separation from the husband and has not
53 A-1655/2012/J.
even specified the date of separation, it is hardly possible to
arrive at a conclusion as to whether she left the matrimonial
home on her own or whether she was left at her father's house
by the respondent, is an ambiguous aspect.
95. From the husband's lengthy evidence which runs in
39 pages, it can be seen that on 2.4.2011 when he was
watching India Vs. Pakistan World Cup Match with his friends
and India had won, he and his friends went out to celebrate the
victory when the petitioner had phoned him to come home early
and he told her that he would return after one hour. To this, she
is said to have got hysterical and went on phoning him, a record
of 50 times in that short span and this embarrassed him. Even
he does not categorically say anything about what exactly
transpired on 2.4.2011, the day on which they had separated. I,
therefore, find that the petitioner-wife has not been able to
convince this Court as to what incident transpired and since
when exactly she is residing away from the husband, so also as
to whether there is any animus deserendi, the intention to put
an end to the marital ties from the husband or whether it is of
her own volition, has not been established by her either. She
has not said as to what effort she made to go back to her
matrimonial home after 2.4.2011 till she filed the petition for
restitution of conjugal rights, on 18.7.2012.
96. Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 reads as
Section 9 :- Restitution of conjugal rights
“When either the husband or the wife has, without
reasonable excuse, withdrawn from the society of
the other, the aggrieved party may apply, by
petition to the district Court, for restitution of
conjugal rights and the Court, on being satisfied of
the truth of the statements made in such petition
and that there is no legal ground why the
application should not be granted, may decree
restitution of conjugal rights accordingly.”
The petitioner's(wife) father has categorically
deposed that she and her mother had gone to bring back her
belongings from the matrimonial home and that the son-in-law
had earlier brought only two pairs of her clothes. This shows
that the wife has disclosed her intention not to continue in the
matrimonial home and not the husband. This coupled with the
fact that the petitioner's father has categorically deposed
that he did not make any effort to bring about compromise
between the parties, I find that the petitioner-wife has also
failed to prove that the respondent has withdrawn from her
society without reasonable excuse and hence I answer Issue
No.1 in the Negative."
as definitely in my filling date not mentioned but in argument written i have given full info still dismissed.
so my ?? is what further steps i have to take to rectify mistake or option is to go at high court only i am attaching here my order copy also and my wriiten argument copy .
pls go through it and suggest me best way to win case in same court .
pls ....
smitra
29 May 2015 at 11:19
Ejectment suit decreed ex-parte. File execution case and writ of delivery of possession is issued. but the same had been resisted by sister of judgement debtor. filed Misc.Case for police help under order 21 rule 97 of cpc and the case has been dismissed as the resistant sister of the judgement debtor has not been made party in the said misc.case.
What to do? is their any judgement/citation so that appeal can be filed.
PRIYANKA KATARIA
29 May 2015 at 11:00
I want to become lawyer i am going to registered in ignou in which there is Post graduate diploma in intellectual property rights or criminal rights,if i take admission so could i become a lawyer and do practice in court or else
please suggest to me its urgent
R.N.SUNDAR
29 May 2015 at 10:22
An usufructuary mortgage executed on 21.06.1975. In the said mortgage word contains redemption period within five years ( i.e. 20.06.1980)
My Query as follows as
Which date have to be taken as per limitation act 1963 under article 61
1. Execution date of mortgage or
2. Redemtion completion date of mortgage
yatharhpan
29 May 2015 at 09:33
I have given my flat on leave and license basis for 11 months and it is registered.Now tenant want to extend his stay and ready to make another agreement.He says no need to register the same to avoid expenses.My building is likely to be taken up for redevelopment and he may have to vacate before 11 months.Should I accept t hat I am not in possession of the flat as they continue to occupy after expiry for about 11 days.
What precautions I must take to get peacful possession when builder notice for vacating comes.Property is based in Mumbai.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Enquiry
Dear Expert,
Please could you tell me-What is the cost/fees for Confirmation deed will charge by Karnataka Government?
Thanks & Regards,
Parameshwar P