Ashish Pandey
15 June 2015 at 14:57
Hello Sir/Mam,
My father has been residing at Mumbai in a chawl since 1985. He applied for change in address over his Voting card along with the corresponding Voter list in the year 1995. Based on his application he received the acknowledgement receipt by filling form8 for address change and the original Voting Card too. (Both of these original documents we have kept safely).
On the issued Voting card his new address was mentioned correctly but they did not update the same address in their record (based on which they provide 7-12 UTAARAA). We did not come to know the mistake as we had the original voting card over which correct address was mentioned. But the record at their end had been reflecting the previous address till the year 2007 and then after they updated their record. Now our room has come under redevelopment plan by SRA and they are compulsorily asking for my father’s voting card/ (7-12 Utaaraa)as an address proof of our current address. So we requested to the ‘Election Officer’ (Old Custom House, Churchgate, Mumbai) to make changes in their record or give a letter against this issue, but they just simply reverted back that they cannot modify the previous record , also they don’t have any record as ‘Chinchpokli Legislative Assembly' has dissolved to ‘Byculla Legislative Assembly'.
In this context, to whom may I consult to escalate the issue so that I can prove my father’s existence over this address as this is the mandatory document required by BMC and if this issue will not get resolved our candidature may get canceled. So please suggest the possible solutions.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Ashish Pandey
S.ROHAN KRISHNA
15 June 2015 at 14:41
SIR,is there any bar if a suit filed for eviction of a tenant in a civil court for the below the amount mentioned in ap rent control act plz give me rply
thank-you
guddu
15 June 2015 at 14:20
I HAVE FILED CIVIL SUIT ON LAND DISPUTE FOR INTERIM INJUNCTION. MY DEFENDANT HAS ALSO MOVED AN APPLICATION FOR SOME INTERIM PRAYER WHICH IS COMPLETELY OPPOSITE TO MY PRAYER. LOWER COURT AFTER HEARING BOTH PARTIES WITH COMMON ORDER COURT ALLOWED MY APPLICATION WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS. I HAVE APPEALED IN HIGHER COURT REGARDING THE CONDITION IMPOSED ON ME. LOWER COURT ORDER WAS CONFIRMED BY DIVISION BENCH OF HIGH COURT AFTER HEARING BOTH PARTIES. NOW MY DEFENDANT HAS MOVED AN APPLEATE COURT WITH DELAY IN CONDONATION APPLICATION WITH REVISION APPLICATION TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LOWER COURT. MY LAWYER HAS OBJECTED THE DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION THAT MY OPPONENT WAS WELL AWARE ABOUT THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER COURT AND HE WAS DEFENDING THAT ORDER TILL DIVISION BENCH OF HIGH COURT. ONCE DIVISION BENCH HAS CONFIRMED THE LOWER COURT ORDER, NOW IT IS NOT OPEN TO CHALLENGE VERY SAME ORDER IN APPEALATE COURT AND IT WILL OPERATE AS RES JUDICATA. APPELATE COURT ALLOWED DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION AND PASSED THE ORDER THAT RES JUDICATA WILL BE CONSIDERED DURING REVISION APPLICAITON. IF APPEALTE COURT HELD DURING REVISION APPLICATION THAT RES JUDICATA WILL NOT OPERATE. DOES APPEALTE COURT HAS POWER TO OVER RULE THE DECISION OF LOWER COURT WHICH IS CONFIRMED UPTO THE DIVISION BENCH OF HIGH COURT. what to do now
jpurus
15 June 2015 at 13:43
3 Sons and 4 Daughters are the legal heirs of the property. Father has expired in 1990 and 3 Sons had changed the patta from father to their names in 2007, without the consent of 4 Daughters. In 2013, all the 4 daughters challenged against the patta in Tahsildar office and later RDO has cancelled the existing patta due to all the legal heirs were not included in the fathers patta property. Now the 3 sons went for appeal in District Revenue Officer office challenging the RDO verdict.
My question is…
1) What would be the legal proceedings thereafter? How to end their appeal.
2) How do the 4 daughters get immediate remedy from this and get their own partitions.
3) 4 daughters need Joint Patta as a priority? What is the process?
rahul
15 June 2015 at 13:17
Hi,
Respected Members,
Plaintiff is a financially weak person. He do not afford to pay to private lawyers & hence he asked for legal aid from state legal aid but they were taking time in providing legal aid & suit will have time barred & hence plaintiff filed suit in person.
Suit is against local authority. Authority has its own Act which states that before filling any suit against authority two months prior notice is required to give to the authority of intended suit.
Plaintiff was not aware of this provision of two months prior notice to the authority & hence plaintiff has not given two months statutory notice to authority under particular section of Authority Act.
But at the time of filling of suit plaintiff was under impression that authority is owned by State Government & all the officers of Authority are Government Servants & hence plaintiff has given two months prior notice to authority & its officers under section 80c of civil procedure code.
some officers of Authority has replied to the notice u/s 80c of cpc but did not told plaintiff that notice u/s 80c cpc is not applicable to them.
And after lapse of two months period plaintiff has filed suit in court & after issuing summons, Authority has filed Written Statement that plaintiff has not given two months pre - suit statutory notice to authority under particular section of Authority Act & hence suit be dismissed for non - compliance of mandatory provisions.
1. In this situation, Can court treat notice under 80c of cpc as notice under particular section of Authority by virtue of its powers u/s 151 of cpc ?
2. Whether Court will dismissed plaintiff suit on technical fault ?
Please Reply.
Thank you
gurijalakoteswararao
15 June 2015 at 13:14
My father was govt employee and he 0 expired,he got job under ST category he is saying at that time kinda kummara belongs to ST, but now kummara considering as BC-b.me and my sister's having obc certificate as per constitution rules,now I would like claim job under compensation is there any problem like effecting to my mother pention please suggest what todo
sandeep rane
15 June 2015 at 12:47
Respected Membars,
Maharashtra- After section 9 insert the following section 9A.
“9A. Where at the hearing of application relating to interim relief in a suit, objection to jurisdiction is taken such issue to be decided by the court as a preliminary issue:-
As per the above section, Can objection regarding limitation be treated as preliminary issue ?
Thank you.
OMPRAKASH.K.RAJBHAR
15 June 2015 at 11:21
Dear Sir
We had a flat under mahada in worli in the name of my grandfather who is expired,he had two son,we want know ownership of flat can be transfer jointly to both of his son
Please give the list of documents required
Waiting for your kind reply
Thanking You
Regards
Omprakash
Mohini
15 June 2015 at 11:20
Sir, i want to adopt my sister daughter ( aged 5 years ). She is divorecee.
Pls advise what are the legal system.
Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
datak(god) putra ka adhikar dada ki jamin parrr
Dada ki jamin par uske datak putra ka kya adhikar hoga....jabki uske pas koi resister godnama ni h..