CHARAN SINGH
12 August 2016 at 23:18
A case of judicial separation was filed by a husband since husband and wife were living separately for last fourteen years. Wife filed F.I.R. under section 498A, 406, 34 I.P.C. in which eight out of total 9 accused were discharged by the court. During cross-examination with the wife in the judicial separation case. The judge started writing cross examination at 1:15 P.M. and repeatedly requested the husband to close the cross-examination with the wife at 1:40 P.M. On his request, the husband said ok assuming that the cross-examination will be deferred for the next date.
But on the next date, husband came to know that the cross examination was closed by the judge arbitrarily at the last date. Husband gave application for cross examination which was disallowed by the judge and a cost of Rs. 1,000/- was put on the husband stating that you are trying to delay the case and the case was fixed for final arguments.
Husband was not ready for this, then in the open court, the judge said to the husband that you are living separately for the last fourteen years and I will allow judicial separation on this ground in my judgement. You should not waste your time in bringing more evidences. Then the husband did not object to it and the judge gave judgement dismissing the case with cost on the husband.
Now the husband is feeling cheated by the judge. Is any action allowed in the law against the judge?
Rahul sahu
12 August 2016 at 23:14
if a property covered 143 then dakhil kharij requirement is not necessary
Ram
12 August 2016 at 21:36
Hello Sir,
MY father and my uncle (his real brother) both have 50% share in a property. Now my uncle wants to sell his 50% share to third party known to us and my father wants to gift his 50% share to his son that is me.
My father and my uncle both are 80years and are not able to go to the registrar office, so we have to call the registrar home.
We are confused if my father who is the first owner becomes the confirming party and on the same day if he makes a gift deed then who will be the confirming party as my uncle would have already sold his rights to third party.
Kindly suggest.
Vardhan
12 August 2016 at 21:03
Dear Sirs,
Pls give your valuable advice/suggestion on my service matter.
The case is that, I had applied for a Technical Assistant post in a Central PSU & appeared in interview for said permanent post but got Appointment letter for trainee post i.e. ‘’Technical Assistant( trainee)” for a period of one year.
Thereafter, I had joined this trainee post with that hope, after one year of training period, I will be confirmed according to said advertisement, But after the completion of one year training period, the Management extended the training period by one year & again six months too, no letter of the extension of the training or for any other purpose, was issued and the management silently allowed me to continue service as trainee.
Now, I have rendered 2 year & 5 months service in PSU as trainee.
I have sent a request letter for absorption to Top Management but did not get any response.
Whereas, Clear cut Guide line given in company Policy for absorption that “Trainees who successfully complete the training would be absorbed as regular employees in induction level of the categories in the grades/scales on need basis as approved by competent authority”.
Kindly advice, what next step should I take.
Regards,
Vardhan
abhijeet
12 August 2016 at 20:44
dear sir i have received an attestation form by a public sector bank. It has a question "have you ever be fined by court of law?" ... now i have been spot fined by RTO or traffic police once for driving without helmet.... i want to know that does spot fine or challan by RTO or traffic police means fined by court of law? i am confused . what should be my answer to this question? what should i write yes or no? should i have to mention this case in my attestation form
Raj
12 August 2016 at 20:38
Sir/ madam the case is going on in district court u/s 506 323 452 354 336.what is the cosequences of it.oppsition party has filed wrong case becase daroga of that police statiin has relation with oposition .sir how can i defend the case more powerfully.
chandrasen Vijay More
12 August 2016 at 20:17
Sir
(A) Me having Joint Account with my
1)father 2) Mother 3)My self(son) Saving account
in State Bank of India .
(B) Other Account of My father Pension (Account) In BAnk of Baroda single but after ward father got alzheimer and could not do signature properly so moher name was added in it , now my elder brother is Banker and fooling mother to do division because me have some Job problem and was at home and he was complaining eating pension ... and he strated doing divison.
and in mean while we have added the name of Mother in Pension account due to some dispute Brother tooked the mother with him and father with me me Job less and me spend 1.50 lac on hospitalization and and as mother is & pass does not know banking he misguided that me is doing wrong signature on cheque on mother and taking money from bank.
And she acted on the advise of my brother and she complained the Bank and Pension account was Freezed.
(c)Now father is dead/ 2 year before
and i got cheque his single name printed of pension account of Bank if Baroda duly signed and written on it Vijay B More and date 08/08/2016 and me deposited this cheque today cheque of Bank of Baorda Pension account in our Joint Account with my
1)father 2) Mother 3)My self(son) Saving account
in State Bank of India .
Is it Illegal
Thakning YOu
Chandrasen V More
MOHD AZID
12 August 2016 at 17:46
We are the manufacturer of HDPE Bags. Our manufacturing unit is situated in Haryana. Our branch office for Trading only also situated in Uttar Pradesh. Entry Tax @ 5% is applicable in Uttar Pradesh w.e.f. 03.06.2016 on entry of HDPE Bags in local area. VAT @ 5% is applicable on the sale of HDPE Bags in Uttar Pradesh. We are transferring the stock against Form-F from our Haryana Manufacturing Unit to Uttar Pradesh Trading Branch and the same stock selling in Uttar Pradesh with charging of VAT @ 5%.
How to Compute Entry Tax & VAT in Uttar Pradesh?
Anonymous
12 August 2016 at 17:39
Dear sirs
You all are kindly requested to please suggest me either a videotape can be a evidence,in which the witness has accepted that he has not seen you on crime site.
whereas in court he says that you are guilty.
Can a person escape by providing these audio/video clips in court
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Property dispute
We r 5 brothers. I and my elder brother where working together in a shop but the shop was in the name of my elder brother. During that time my elder brother bought a piece of land on his name.So my question is can i claim my right on that land?if yes then what proof do i need to bring out.