johnson
13 September 2016 at 14:48
Hi Sir, I belong to christian community(BC) and my wife belong to Hindu (BC) . Is the employment preference for govt job . do we are eligible for it. To whom we need to contact about this sir.Please help. We both are graduates.
Rakesh chopra
13 September 2016 at 13:54
Hi sir,
My first motion has been completed but i have doubt pls suggest -
1) Is there any law/rules that HC can not quash 498a FIR before completion of second motion.
2)please suggest any supreme court judgement that wife can not back out/ ignore for quashing the 498a after getting mutual consent divorce as per agreement (MOU).
3)If wife would be back out than what remedies we should take.
4)if wife back out than Does HC still have the power to quash the 498aFIR.
5)pls provide Any High court or Supreme court judgement.
L V Subramaniam
13 September 2016 at 13:49
Can the charity Commissioner Bombayhave jurisdiction over an immovable property belonging to a registered charitable trust situated in Bangalore Karnataka charitable trust registered under BPT act 1950 having its a regd office merely on records of charity commissioner and in reality do not have any property or office in Mumbai since three decades and the red office having vacated long ago by the original promoter therefore having no regd office in Mumbai ., having its immovable property in the state of karnataka and all life trustees permanent residents in Karnataka particularly in the light of Supreme court judgement (civil appeal 2409 of 2006 arising out of SLP (Civil) NO 4529 of 2003 dt 2.5.2006 Nautam Praksh D.G.S.V.C ., Vadtal& ors v.K.K.Thakkar & ors Supreme court judgment summary comments "Bombay Public Trust ACt (4 of 1950) S.41 Bombay charity commissioner(Regional Reorganisation )Order 1960 C1 4(b) Administration of TRust - Trust situated in STate of Gujarat i.e. GujaratGujarat Region-Only some properties of Trust are situated in Maharashtra region-aApplication filed by respondent claiming himself to be member of Trust before Assistant charity commissioner GREateerr Bombay under sec41A and 41 B for apppointment of proper persons and trustees of said Trust -Jurisdiction of charity commissioner,Bombay held to be confined only management of property situate within the state of maharashtra and not in relation to entire -However any application allegeging mismanagement of Trust maybe forwarded to Assistant charity Commissioner Gujarat W.P.NO 1519 of 2002 dt 25.09. 2002 Reversed Doctrines : -Doctrine of lex situs The field of legislation in respect of religious endowments and religious institutions is referable gto Item 28 of List III of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India .Ordinarily therefore the Legislation enacted by a STate will be applicable only within the territorial limits thereof. There is a general presumption that, the legislature does not intend to exceed its jurisdiction. An act relating to religious and charitable institutions would be presumed to be applicable only inrespect of the properties or any part thereof situate in the STateThe 1960 Act however makes the provision explicit,clear and unambiguous. The Property of TRust situate within Maharashtra region in terms of CI 4(b) Order is to be deemed to be registered wsith the charity commissioner Bombay.The said authority could thus have exercised its jurisdiction only in respect of that property.It had no jurisdiction in relation to the administration of the entire trustas the office of the Trust is situate within the STate of Gujarat.The Assistant charity commissioner therefore could not have issue direction as prayed for in the application filed before it by respondent A statutory authority as is well known, must exercise its jurisdiction within the four corners of the statute.It cannot go beyond the same Thus the jurisdiction of the charity commissioner Bombay must be held ggo be confined only to themanagement of property situate within the State of Maharashtra and not in relation to the entire Trust However in the event such an application is filed indisputably the same has to be determined on its own merit. Therefore any such application alleging mismanagement of the Trust , if filed may be forwarded to the Assistant charity commissioner Gujarat who shall deal with it (PARAS 24,28,29) Cases referred chronogical paras( AIR 1969SC566 26 AIR 1968 sc422 27 AIR 1963 SC853 25 AIR 1959SC 1002 25 AIR 1955 SC 590 23 AIR 1954 SC 340 24 The Parliament enacted the Bombay Reorganisation Act 1960 in terms of whereof thre STate of gujarat was carved out of the ?STate of Bombay In anticipation of such reorganisation , the Legislature of the State of Bombay enacted the Bombay STatutory Corporations (Regional ActXXI of 1960) section 3 3(1) hereof read as under: 3(1) If it appears to the STate Govvernment expedient that any existing corporation which is operating and functioning immediately before the commencement of this Act should be dissolved or that it should be recohstituted and reorganised so that there are established or functioning separatecorporations for the Mhahrashtra and Gujarat regions. that Government may by or make provision for such dissolution or reconstitution and reorganisation of such existing corporation The said provision was intended to the institution of charity commissioner "By virtu of Legal department order No12921 /E dated the 28th april 1960 the charity commissioner Bombay a corporation sole was reconstituted and reorganised so as to constitute a new corporation for Gujarat region and to reconstitute the existing corporation to function for Maharashtra Region Clauses 4(b) & c, 5 and 6 (a) & (b) read thus "4 Registration of public trusts where property or office is situate-in the case of a public trust duly registered under the ACt before the appointed day or deemed to be so registered if, immediately before that day The BPT Act sec 28A states thus Copy of entries relatting immovable property to be Sub Registrar:The Deputy or charity commssioner shall send a memorandum in the prescribed form containing entries inclduing the entry of the name and description of the public trust relating immovable property of such publc trust made by him in the register kept under section 17 of BPT act : (i) to the Sub Registrar of the su district appointed under the Indian Rgistration Act 1908 in which immovable property is situate in The case of registered of Union registered under indian trade unions act 1926 gave registered office in a building acquired on rental in Mumbai by the management as part of a facility to house union office and since union was the promoter of the trust it assumed it had the right to house the trust promoted by them and accordingly gave that address which is no longer applicable as the management themselves vacated the building and consequently union had to vacate but did not want to change the address of the trust to the new premises to which they moved because of internal disputes Therefore the Trust cannot be said to be situated in Mumbai where is no office neither registered nor even an administrative Besides the trust has no property in Mumbai or maharashtra and the immovable property is the state of karnataka Therefore it was the duty of charity commissioner under section 28A to advise the Sub Registrar of Bangalore all details of the property and the trust should be deemed to have been registered karnataka under the relevant law under which charitable trusts registered in Karnatkaa The simple question is consequent on state reorganisation would the charity commissioner have jurisdiction over the property outside the state of maharashtra which not withstanding the absence of similar legislature akin BPT act 1950. It was the statutory duty of the charity commissioner to send all details of the property on his record to sub registrar under Indian registration act
Read more at: http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/
Anonymous
13 September 2016 at 12:48
Myself priya.My boyfriend is very next to my home. He proposed me but in the being I rejected his proposal,after that I aspected his proposal and we where in relationship. During my birthday time he was not talking to me properly. To know the reason,I forced him for the reason. he told me that he is not truly loving me. He just acted because he wanted to talk to me as a friend. for that reason only he proposed me nu. This words made me disappointed because we were in very close relationship that we had some physical touch.After that I begged,forced him for the relationship but he was not ready. So I left the issue and was doing my work.
Again after 3 4 months he started talking to me. I too started talking to him. We were discussing about our work, family etc. That time he told he wanted to meet me I too agreed to meet him. After that I proposed him again because I aspected him because I love him from the being to till day. For that he told let us not talk about that now will first achieve in our life and if our fate is to get married. It will surly happened. After that we were talking on general things.
After some days he asked for a meeting. we met again but we did not spent time because he took permission so he had some work tension. so I asked him for a day out like will go for movie,beach and park. But he told will go to movie and resort. I did not agree but the reason he told was acceptable because morning time It will be sunny so will go to resort. I asked him on what basis you are taking me to resort. For that he told he is not a men found of girl and I am not found of boy. So Staying in a room is not wrong. I aspected his words and went. There he came close to me I avoided him then aspected. After that we had some physical relationship. But nothing happened between us. After that day he again started avoiding me saying work tension,Work load etc.
After 10days around night 11 o'clock he texted me saying his family is planning to do marriage for him with his uncle's daughter. I did not aspect his words. I kept questioning him. And I had his father num I ringed up to his num that time his father told that he got married to the girl whom he loved. I again called him and asked that time only he agreed that he was in relationship with that girl for more then year while he was in relationship with me they got some fight so she left and now again they started loving so they got married now.
He married that girl in registry office before one year and now only he told his family and to me. He wanted cheated me in the name of love. For his sexual need. Now after his family aspected his love he want to stay with that girl without any disturbance from my side. Now I need some guidelines what to do. I did not share this with my family because what I have done is very bad. And I have unmarried sister this should not effect them. I want a true justice to my life. But that should not effect my family.
Rajesh Kumar Surapur
13 September 2016 at 12:34
Dear Sir/Madam,
I was employed with a public limited company from 15/09/2011 to 31/07/2016 i.e., 4 years 10 months 15 days ( six days a week).
As per HR department, I am not eligible for payment towards Gratuity.
Could you please advise whether i am eligible for gratuity payment as per the latest provisions in the Gratuity Act 1974.
S. Rajesh Kumar
9849742950
K M Mishra
13 September 2016 at 11:46
A lady relative have executed a registered will in favour of her four relatives the lady was having account in four different bank and a locker in the bank, on the basis of that will by the suggestion of some lawyers filed the petition for succession certificate in the competent court but now some are saying that on the basis of succession certificate no locker can be opened except the grant of letter of administration. Now what should I do? I am from Varanasi, Uttar pradesh
Citizen
13 September 2016 at 11:34
Hello Sir, in a case accused of cheating Honorable Court has granted bail with condition that the accused as to attend the local police station on every second and fourth Tuesday respectively until charge sheet is filled. What has to be the next procedure because accused has been forcibly pulled in this case.
rajesh
13 September 2016 at 11:09
Hello Sir/Madam,
My Dad is collecting income from property(Property was inherited from predecessors). I have one elder brother & no Sisters.
My Dad is not giving me any accounts to the income and do not share details too. He is not giving any money to me. I'm unable to be live in hometown to take care of properties or to do any work. The property is still not divided between me, my brother and Dad.
Do I have Equal right to the income from inherited property? Is there a way I can force my father to give me some share of income?
Anonymous
13 September 2016 at 10:47
सख्या भावाचेही घर बळकावले !
धाऊलवल्लि, तेलिवाडी राजापुर : येथील धोंडू भिकाजी राणे यांच्या मुत्यु नंतर रामचन्द्र भिकाजी राणे ह्या सख्या भावाचेच घर बळकावले असल्याचे समोर आले आहे.
धाऊलवल्लि ता. राजापुर येथील रामचन्द्र भिकाजी राणे यांनी आपला सख्खा भाऊ धोंडू भिकाजी राणे यांचे चाळिश वर्षापुर्वी घर नं 369 मंगलोरी बांधकाम असलेले घर बळकावले.नंतर या घराचे ग्रामपंचायतिला धोका देवून स्वताच्या नावावर करून घेतले.फेरफार न ग्रामपंचायतिने ही असेसमेंट चे नाव बदलले.धोंडू भिकाजी राणे यांचा मुत्यु 26-10-1976 रोजी संशयास्पद रितीने झाला सांताकुज़ मुंबईला विहिरीत झाला या विरुद्ध माज्या काकांनी चंद्रकांत धोंडू राणे व् माझ्या वडिल़ानी मनोहर धोंडू राणे यानि धोंडू भिकाजी राणे याच्या मुत्यु बाबत गृह विभाग यांच्या निकालासाठी पत्र पाठविले होते जा नं मु मं स HD /2857 दिनाक 4 फेब्रुवारी 1977 तसेच धोंडू भिकाजी राणे याच्या मुत्यु बाबत वाकोला पुलिस स्टेशन ने o w no 5424/1980 व् 4266 पत्र कादले की धोंडू भिकाजी राणे याच्या मालमत्तेकरीता न्यायालयात जावे.2011 ला 369 घर तोडून नविन घर बांधले ते आता दत्ताराम रामचंद्र राणे यांच्या नावावर आहे.
मी ग्रामपंचायत/ पंचायत समिति/ जिल्हापरिषद् यांच्याकडेही तक्रार केली की फेरफार न करता घर असेसमेंट बदल झाला कसा मात्र अजूनही न्याय काही मिळाला नाही
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sec.354
Namaste! I am from Badlapur,thane. A guy from my locality had made my fake facebook profile by using my name and photos in it. He started vulgar chats with the others. For this we raised the complaint to the nearest police station and after investigation they file an F.I.R under section 354 and the boy was send to jail, after 2 days he got the bailed.
Now its more than 10 months we didnot got any notice from court regarding hearing of our case, we dont even know whether the police has submitted the chargesheet. Whenever we tried to contact the police they replies that everything is ok we no need to wory.
What should we do know..? Can i be safe from that guy..? If again anything wrong happens who will be responsible..? Please help me out from this.