Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

pushpakrishna   18 August 2017 at 19:15

Dismissal for default in a case

Dear experts
In a case filed u/s 138 of ni act, on the date of hearing due to by mistake the complainant and the counsel not attended the case and hence the case was dismissed by the magistrate.
Now what is the option for the complainant
As there is no fault of the counsel or the complaint but due to mistake of noting the date of hearing.
Kindly advice on this my dear experts and
Thanq in advance..

SIVA KUMAR   18 August 2017 at 18:16

Can amend my late father ws

Sir,
My deceased father filed written statement on 2005 in the trial court, after his demise on 2008 I & my brother are impleaded as legal heirs of him in the trial court even though we have independent right over the suit property through registered partition deed 16 years prior to filing of suit, at present only plaintiff’s side witness completed, Kindly let me know now can we amend my late fathers written statement in the trial court ? if so how

Anonymous   18 August 2017 at 18:13

Registration

Can Parents be the Witness as well as Beneficiary ? As am the only child

Krishna   18 August 2017 at 18:11

7/12 of land

Dear Expert

I purchased a Land in Murbad. The 7/12 of land is available online.The developer is claiming that 7/12 is not required officially signed by Teshildar.Should I accept it from developer or should I get the signed copy from Teshildar. Is it mandatory to have sign copy from Teshildar. Please advice

Anonymous   18 August 2017 at 18:04

Annulment of Marriage

I got into a court marriage under pressure of my boyfriend last September without the knowledge of my family. After the marriage I was at my house and he was at his house. His a entire Family was present at the time of the marriage. No witness or anybody related to me knew about this. Day day his behaviour got worse towards me his insecurities just increased. I was always blamed for wrong things which I'm not even related to. This was a mental torture to me. Emotional physical mental tortures had become a part of my life for 4 years. He used to blackmail me if I would not agree to what he wanted. Now after facing so much I spoke everything with my brother and told him. We wanted to get this marriage annulled. Pls suggest me how do I annul it. For more details about this: both of us are Muslims the marriage was Registered under section 13 witnesses were his parents and friend. This took place on September 22 and the certificate is dated on 7th November 2016. Plz help me out. And let me know how I move ahead without wasting time. Thanks in advance!

Alok   18 August 2017 at 17:57

Help in section 125 maintenance case

Hi, Pls advice. One of my known has filed a case under section 125 for maintenance from her husband. She has given evidence in court which was also crossed by the lawyer but the initial petition I hope was in the form of affidavit (it was on plain papers in para mentioning the reasons that her husband compelled her to leave him). Now after all witness and evidences the opponent lawyer has given some references of old cases where he has mentioned that in sec. 125 summon process of evidence is not followed and it should not be in the form of affidavit. Pls advice.

Anonymous   18 August 2017 at 17:54

Help me in tor law

in this case I have to prove my client or appellant innosent in favour of nuisance
¶ 9. In March 2015 the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer classified the herbicide glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic in humans" based on epidemiological and other studies.
¶ 10. Mr. Nikhil Joshiowned60 hectares of farmland outside Pune. In 2013, Mr. Joshi first planted Roundup Ready canola on part of his farmland. Seeing how well it did, and how well he could control weeds with glyphosate in that experimental plot, Mr. Joshi converted all of his production to Roundup Ready canola in 2016.
¶ 11. Ms. Aparna Kumar inherited 60 hectares of farmland after her mother’s death in 2014, which land was across the street from Mr. Joshi’s land. Her mother had grown canolaon the farmland. After her mother’s death, Aparna converted the farm to certified organic canola and diversified production by planting grape vines. The production of canola increased by 10% per hectare after Ms. Kumar took over.
¶ 12. Over time Mr. Joshi and Ms. Kumar began to disagree about whether genetically engineered or organic canola plants were more productive, produced a superior product, and were better for the soil.
¶ 13. One day in May 2016, Ms. Kumar woke to find most of the canola plants on her land brown and desiccated. Mr. Joshi had sprayed his Roundup Ready canola crop with glyphosate the day before, which day had been windy. His canola plants looked fine. Ms. Kumar lost 75% of her canola crop. The 25% that remained were those plants closest to the land of Mr. Joshi, and Ms. Kumar surmised that they were in fact Roundup Ready migrants from Mr. Joshi’s land. The grape vines on Ms. Kumar’s land lost their leaves and died. Ms. Kumar lost her organic certification.
¶ 14. In a published interview that was requested by a reporter from the Pune Times, Ms. Kumar said “That so-called farmer Joshi killed my grape vines and my canola plants. He destroyed the farmland that my family has worked for generations. His canola oil is unsafe and will kill people, too. It is time we stopped exploiting Mother Earth and damaging our neighbors, ourselves, and all of creation in the process.”
¶ 15. Several of Mr. Joshi’s customers voided their purchase contracts for his canola oil after they read the article. Mr. Joshi also got several new customers shortly after the article was published as well.
¶ 16. Ms. Kumar filed a civil suit against Mr. Joshi in District Court. She sought compensation for the damage caused to her grapes, canola, and farm certification. Mr. Joshi counterclaimed for defamation and damages.
¶ 17. By judgment delivered in May 2017, the District Court issued a judgment in favor of Ms. Kumar on the damages to her land, awarding her Rs 99 Lakhs and for Mr. Joshi on the defamation claim, and awarding him Rs. 99.
¶ 18. Mr. Joshi appealed to the Bombay High Court and the final hearing has been scheduled for August 30, 2017.

BHAWNA   18 August 2017 at 17:18

Minimum 2 directors

if Company files resignation of one director out of two and the appointing another director few months later, then As per the Law it is violating Section 149 of Companies Act, 2013. Any way to safe the Company for that months?

Jasmine   18 August 2017 at 16:45

Need help

Sir mere husband ne divorce case lgaya tha.aaj woh present ni hue .judge ne case dismis kr diya.kya iska koi benefit mujhe mil skta hai? Kya woh dubara application de k open krva skte hai case?.ya case dismis hone par ab woh divorce nai le ske ge?plz reply

Jasmine   18 August 2017 at 16:39

Need help

Can u tell me agr judge divorce case dismiss krde to iska koi benefit respondent ko mil skta hai?divorce case petitioner ki tarafse lga ho.