Harekrishna D C
05 November 2017 at 14:18
Hi!
I had filed an application to the 1st munsif madhubani seeking an ex-parte injunction (order 39 rule 3a) order aginst mukhiya restraining him from carrying our any kind of financial and non financial activity, as he witheld his criminal past and is a government servant. Both these details he witheld from his application filed to contest the application. This is since february 2017 onwards. Case status is admitted notice is served but notice hasn't been received by the party nor has it made any appearance
I filed an application to the munsif who did not pass any order, now the munsif has been transferred, and their is an incharge court which holds all the court records.
I would be filing a fresh application for ex-parte injunction to the incharge court as original application suffers demerit. Lawyers say that incharge court cannot pass any order and i have to wait till the next munsif arrives. So I cannot wait for 5 years for the new munsif to appear.
Now I want the incharge court to pass the ex-parte injunction order, can the incharge court pass the order as my case has merit, but the question is under which law / act is the incharge court authorised to pass such an order.
Please help! If any lawyer from patna or delhi would like to file the suit in Patna high court and obtain the ex-parte injunction order simulatneusly while the suit is pending in madhubani as multiplicity of proceedings does not apply to injunction, are openly welcome.
Anonymous
05 November 2017 at 13:55
Hello,
I would like to know if it is mandatory to issue GST Rental Invoices every month, when the rental income aggregate is less than 20 lakhs per year, since GST is not applicable in this case.
This is for properties located in Delhi, and Punjab.
Thank you.
vasudevan v
05 November 2017 at 13:39
Sir,
I am a member of the housing society regd under Tamilnadu societies Act 1975
I have a query.
Byelaws approved on 23-12-2016
Returning officers appointed on 23-12-2016 to conduct elections on 29-01-17
Elections held, voting by members done, results announced, EC appointed and two EC meetings conducted in Feb and Mar 17 and 4 EC meetings conducted after 03-04-17
In Feb 17, First EC meeting authorised president & secretary to register Assn
Secretary filed papers for regn on 12-05-2017
Regn certificate issued on 14-06-2017
Later it was found out by one member, that the formation date was given as 03-04-2017
Form VI -member register shows all members joined on 03-04-2017
All EC meetings, authorisation given by EC in Feb 17 are invalid in the eye of Law because formation date
is declared as 03-04-17. Assn cannot exist prior to formation
All members including EC members as per records submitted joined only on 03-04-2017 and therefore prior to 03-04-2017 they are all rank outsiders and non members.
Election conducted in Jan 17 is nullified by wrongfully declaring the date of formation as 03-04-17
Therefore EC is invalid
Secretary cannot file papers as no valid authorisation given
Regn is invalid
Bank Account is opened on 14-03-17
Pls clarify my doubt whether EC is valid, regn is valid
All members paid member fee of Rs 10/- in Jan 17 and exercised their vote in Jan 17 election
Subscription of Rs 100 collected only from 03-04-17
Entire EC resigned Ad-hoc committee formed to conduct fresh elections.
In the circumstances whether regn is valid
if not can we correct the records as mistake
or can we go for fresh regn
Thanks in advance
kankit kumar
05 November 2017 at 12:07
Dear Sir Mam,
I was marry in June 2017 with the girl having consent of both (arranged marriage? Since than we are not any physical relation . my wife doesn't allow all that also she doesn't tell any reason. However even I have tried my best to convince her to cooperate but she neglect. Pls let me know unless having physical relation whether lagally we are husband & wife. Can I file the divorce petition on the ground of cruelty cited that we never had physical relation?
Thanks
Kankit
AJAY KUMAR RANADHEER
05 November 2017 at 10:20
we had a society name nallaballi sunkula parameshwari devasthanam ,president R SESHU KUMAR president he is my father ,and vice president wants to occupy the presidents post he raised disputes between committe members and they have registered a new commite on same temple named sunkulamma avva devasthanam president narashimhulu .he is vice president of our committe , before dissolving our committe he created new one and he put a false case on me that he was president of sunkulamma avva devalaiyam ,r.seshu kumar taken pro notes of temple and he had beaten me , pls recover , the case registerd in police station on againest me sir pls help me to prove i am right
Bharat Vakil
05 November 2017 at 08:52
I was told by a friend that Hon'ble Apex Court has held that Nominee shall inherit property over ridding a Wll. Is it true.? Can I have details of judgement please.
Member (Account Deleted)
05 November 2017 at 08:36
My 10 years old kid admitted to India's top boarding school. 6th month kid reported Bad Touch by Hostel warden and Kid's behaviour was changed. Active cheerful kid changed to gloomy. Parents with High hopes reported the matter to Principal and requested to take necessary corrective actions within School premises to ensure security and safety of the kid so Kid can pass next 6 months in the same Hostel with secure, safe and conducive atmosphere.
Principal called parents to meet from other city and in meeting Principal told the parents that kid is mis-interpreting the touch by warden and on further talk by the parent, Principal said bring your child to enquiry commiitee. In enquiry commiitee all members present reportable to Principal and with parents permission asked queries for 35-40 minutes back-to-back on which parents thought The Information which they extracted from the child very gently and softly in number of days and here in enquiry how they are grilling the child and why they allow them because parents putin very Hard efforts to bring a single smile on mental traumatic child.
On seeking path forward for safe and conducive atmosphere, school people said they will discuss internally and meeting over. Then for the days no reply from the school. Kid is not going to the school (As per residential school rules, Parents drop the school at the gate and have no access to the kid after that except weekly once callup day then without confirmation on security they cannot drop kid to the Hostel).
When parents again wrote the Principal and asked without confirmation and no corrective actions on safe atmosphere from her side, they are unable to drop the kid to school hostel and kid is suffering school loss and going through mental trauma so please refund full fees as they will seek admission in another school and their they have to pay so pls to resume child studies refund fees.
And this email went to president of the school, Child ministry, child helpline.
After 15 days, Principal filed FIR, not sure on what basis as maintaining safe atmosphere within the school is HER work. Now Police is calling parents for statements recording. Parents are working on resuming child school, and other logistics. NOW THINGS ARE COMPLETELY STOPPED. Child is not going to school, School is not answering on fees refund and FIR was not filed by the parents then why their statements are needed. Parents reported the matter to the Principal and awaiting her reply. Please advise.
Jivesh Dewangan
04 November 2017 at 21:25
Mere papaji ki death ho gayi h...
Aur mere dadi ki property ka batwara Ni hua h...
Aur mere papaji ke 2 bhai aur h
Total property 3 part me divide honi chahiye..
But Bahut pehle mere papaji Ko thoda SA hissa de diya Gaya tha aur ek simple sa affidavid Bana h jisme mere papaji ne sign Kiya tha,aur usme ye likha h ki m(my father) future me aur batware Ni lunga karke
par Jo property unhe di gayi thi vo puri property ka 5 % bhi Ni h..
To kya ab m Barabar(one third of whole property)ke Hisse ka Davao kar Sakta hu kya??
surendra prakash agrawal
04 November 2017 at 20:40
Pl suggest major points to be checked before any document is marked as Exhibit in DRTs.
email: sp.agarwal8696@gmail.com
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Surcharge/additional cost for pumping upon metered water
Hello,
My apartment's name is SLV UNIWORTH CLASSIC @ HBR layout and we have already made individual metering system all the 14 existing Apartments because 4 years back the Builder used to live in the Penthouse which is one of the 14 apartments and a lot of water was being wasted and to control that we made the water metering system.
The association took a decision without the consent of the members or the residents living living in the apartment which otherwise is done on all the previous occasions when a decision is taken.
Even after we have metres in place and we have been paying as per the consumption of water they are trying to put a surcharge or additional cost of pumping by deciding a cap off number of liters.
is it fare to allocate 14500 liters per month for a family 1 and a family of 6?
My point is changing extra over the metered usage is Illegal and threatening the tenants and forcably making them pay is Illegal.
Please share expert advice as I feel this is Illegal.
House no no of ppl
001. 3
002. 3
003 3
101. 2
102. 6
103. 3
201. 5
202. 6
203. 4
301. 4
302. 4
303. 1
401. 5
402. 5
Thanks
Prithvi