Praveen
02 May 2018 at 16:39
My friend met with an accident while driving my bike.Fir was filed on him on charge of rash driving.I would love to take up civil service exams in the future.so will it affect me in anyways?
Meena Khaitan
02 May 2018 at 16:15
V hv a stock of Infosys. It's first holder was my FIL. N as per his will everything goes to my BIl. The 2nd holder was my husband n as per his will everything comes to me. My FIL expired first after few yrs my husband also expired. Now my BIL says tht the stock vl b his bcos he is beneficiary of the 1st holder.
My question- what happens to the beneficiary of 2nd holder??
Anonymous
02 May 2018 at 13:38
Facts of the case An amount of Rs 120000/- was seized by income tax department from an assessee way back in 1987. After seizure of the said amount an assessment was made u/s 132(5) of the I.T. Act 1961 for a/y1988-89. In such assessment a demand was raised of tax and penalties of Rs 43450/- and Rs 86900/- respectively. As the liability determined on account of tax and Penalty imposable exceeds the amount seized, entire seized Cash of Rs.120000/- was retained by the assessing officer. Being aggrieved with the assessing officer's order the assessee had filed an application u/s 132(11) of the I.T. Act 1961 before the jurisdictional Commissioner of income tax. Ld.. jurisdictional commissioner in his verdict had quashed the assessing officer's order and directed to release the said amount on 19.08.1993. Since then assesse had sent several reminders to income tax department, but did not succeed in realizing the same. In February's2017 assessee had filed a grievance petition before the central Board of Direct taxes (income tax) for release of said amount together with update interest till date. Against said grievance petition an amount of Rs 120000/-was finally released on 18.05.2017, but interest due on the said amount was not paid. subsequently assessee had again filed a petition before the principal commissioner of income tax on 17.08.2017, claiming interest on the said amount u/s 244A of the I.T. Act 1961. On receipt of the said petition, Principal Commissioner's office had referred the matter to the concerned assessing officer. A.O. had opined that assessee should get interest for 30 years ( i.e. 1987 to 2017) u/s 132B (4) and not u/s 244A. But the concerned Principal Commissioner has not approved that on the ground that the section under which interest is proposed to be paid is not appropriate. Now the question is under which section assesse should get interest on the said amount of Rs 120000/- . In this instant case an assessment was made first u/s 132(5) of the I.T.Act 1961 for the a/y 1988-89 raising a demand of Rs 130350/-, and entire seized cash of Rs 120000/- was adjusted against the liability so determined on account of tax and penalty.for a/y 1988-89. Since the said assessment order was subsequently quashed by the then Ld Jurisdictional Commissioner of Income tax, therefore the amount appropriated by A.O in his said order towards income tax and penalty of Rs.120000/- out of seized cash should be treated as tax and penalty paid in excess for a/y 1988-89 in absence of any liability. Therefore is the assesse not entitled to get interest on said excess payment of tax and penalty of Rs 120000/- for the A/Y 1988-89 u/s 244a of I.T. Act 1961?
sameer kumar
02 May 2018 at 12:00
Dear Sir,
I have a house built on a Panchayat Approved Layout and the site is being taken over by the National Highway Authority of India, What kind of compensation will i Get?
Regards,
SK Sameer Kumar
R.Ramesh
02 May 2018 at 10:06
Dear sir, If employer wish to pay both sides contributions ( here employer don't want to deduct from employee and he wants to pay by himself only ) of PF,ESI,TDS & Professional Tax by employer himself only.So, is there any problem in calculating TDS,Entering in books of accounts and for preparing balance sheet.
Anonymous
02 May 2018 at 09:40
Sir
I am purchased s7 edge second hand
Mobile on one mobile shop but bill not given the shop owner . I am used 4 month
I got call from police cyber crime
Your mobile is theft mobile where your purchased any proof I said where i_am purchased. But I don't have proof no bill
So police are said you will proof otherwise you will a criminal what I can do sir
I am innocent i_am purchased from shop
I_am village people I don't formality
Please help us sir
Anonymous
02 May 2018 at 07:49
I was working with Akraya Private LTD in Pune. I joined them as Director - Recruiting on the 17/5/2015.
The offer letter had details for my pay structure as below:
I willl be paid 22.5 lacs as base salary.
I will be 3.0 Lacs as bonus on completion of my year tenure
In the interim, I suffered an accident, and looking at my bad condition, tte owner offered me a loan amount of 2 lacs, which could be adjusted when I complete my year with his organization. I accepted it.
I was laid off on the 27/4/18. The payment structure as below:
Accounts department will process your “full and final” check as discussed.
Salary for the month of April till 27th.
Leave encashment – If any.
One month of ‘notice pay’.
Bonus pay of Rs. Two lakhs
Deduction of your loan of Rs. Two lakhs.
Please read above, and tell me if I'm eligible to get my annual tenure pay out of 3.0 lacs on the basis of Corporate Laws.
Athi Vishal HD
02 May 2018 at 00:47
1) My wife and in-laws obtained income certificate from Revenue dept wherein it is mentioned that my annual income is 10,000/-. But Im an govt servant and my income is 4 lakh and Im unaware of this certificate.
2)Before my marriage my wife obtained income certificate from Revenue dept wherein it is mentioned that her family income is 7,500/-. But both in-laws are govt servants and their annual income is 5 lakhs.
3) I complained to concerned Police and Revenue Officials but they don't took action.Even NCR has not been regd. They told that my wife is mentally ill patient (thats true) hence no action has been taken.
Is this act amount to cognizable criminal offence? Is there any exemption for mentally ill patient in criminal Offence. If possible please mention the IPC section
(I learned so much abt law from LCI, which helps me to fight against false 498A case)
Thanks in advance,
Athi Vishal HD
02 May 2018 at 00:33
In view of dispute between me and my in-laws, they obtained Aadar card for my 7 yr old child in the name of Akshatha instead of Nakshatra (As per Birth Certificate) to hurt my feelings.
Is this act amount to cognizable criminal offence? If possible please mention the IPC section and Aadhar act section.
(I learned so much abt law from LCI, which helps me to fight against false 498A case)
Thanks in advance,
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
About my mom and father
Hello i have to ask something my father is married with my mom in 1979 and my mom is first wife of my father but my father have affair with another lady also we are onr brother and sister in 2001 my father married to that second lady in without gave divorce to my mom which we dont know we thought she is living just like that with my father in another house but know in 2017 my father is died in december and after that that second lady starting greedyness and asking for the legal rights in property she is asking to share in property and giving trouble to us pls suggest anynone is she have rights we dont know b4 that she is married to my father but know she is telling to everyone that we got married i have photos and certificates but how it is possible that she is married with my father if my mom not gave a divorce to.my father in whole life she is giving so much trouble to us she dont have any cgild pls give any suggestion anybone pls