Master the Science Behind Firearm Evidence. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

A K SARAVANAN   05 November 2008 at 11:40

patta valuable or not

A Dispute between land owner and super structure owner from long years, finally the commissioner of Land Adminsitration was passed a order in favour of us on 1992.
Land vested to government and super structure owner can move to patta.

The Land owner Writ petition filed to Madras High court on 1997 (after five years), case is pending till date. (01.11.2008) In the connections ,We are moving patta during the period from 1992.

Now we are trying patta under TN Free townside vested land patta Scheme.
Our doubt:
1. Writ petition is pending in the case
2. If we are getting patta from government under TN Free vested land scheme, the patta is valuable or not.
3. Writ petition filed after 5 years, the case is stand or not (I think time barred)

Tipsy   05 November 2008 at 11:19

Boy and Girl is from India and staying in Newyork, it is advisable to get married in Newyork or Mumbai?



Boy and Girl is from India and staying in Newyork , we are planning to get married, what would be beneficial to get married in India or Newyork, is there any benefit for our future generation to come?

Please Answer thinking long perspective in mind ! Thanks

Ch. Sujatha   05 November 2008 at 08:00

Negotiable Instrument Act.

Respected Seniors,

The Accused issued a cheque for which time barred debt. i.e. After expiry of 3 years limitation of promissory note the accused issued a cheque towards payment of the said promissory note.

Basing on the said cheque complainant filed a case and now stage is for marking of documents on behalf of complainant.

The complainant filed the said expired pronote for marking of document on his behalf to prove the legally recoverable debt.

In this stage what is the remedy to the Accused to defend his case. Is it possible to mark the said time barred pronote.

Thanking You Sir.

S.K.SARRAF (ADVOCATE)   04 November 2008 at 23:54

ADOPTION DEED UN-REGISTERED ?

WHAT ARE THE DEFENCES AVAILABLE FOR AN UN-REGISTERED ADOPTION DEED ?

FACTS > AN ADOPTION WAS EFFECTED BY SON-LESS FATHER ON STAMP PAPER DECLARING AND ADOPTING ABC AS HIS LAWFUL SON, FOR ALL PURPOSES. THIS WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BY PANCHAYAT, VERIFIED BY LOCAL POLICE STATION, AND EXECUTED IN PRESENCE OF 2 WITNESSES TO IT IN 1980.

CAN THE ADOPTED SON GET THE TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY OF HIS ADOPTIVE FATHER, IN HIS PERSONAL NAME,EVEN WHEN THE ADOPTION DEED IS UN-REGISTERED ?
IS THERE ANY BAR ?

S.K.Sarraf,Advocate.
SIKKIM.
sunnysarraf@gmail.com
98324-62260

Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650   04 November 2008 at 19:34

results of delhi judicial services

i request to the experts pls inform me at once through my e-mail address ,whenever a result of delhi judicial service has been announced by the govt.
my e-mail is
anilomnamh@gmail.com

Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650   04 November 2008 at 19:27

judicial review

sir pls tell me in case of judicial reveiw of any decision of the court, whthear the decision is suppliment or implicate by the supreme court

tell me extentive knowledge of this subject-matter

Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650   04 November 2008 at 19:26

judicial review

sir pls tell me in case of judicial reveiw of any decision of the court, whthear the decision is suppliment or implicate by the supreme court

tell me extentive knowledge of this subject-matter

neelam verma   04 November 2008 at 15:46

redevelopment of dilapilated building

There are total 32 members in a society out of which 30 members have given consent to redevelop their society as well as the society has signed development agreement with the developer. But at present 2 members are opposing to redevelop the society. As a Developer I want to know what will be the legal remedies against those 2 members and the procedure to file suit against them.

Thank you

srinivas   04 November 2008 at 15:35

Maximum time limit to register a site purchased under auction

situation:
Mr.A defaults repayment of housing loan taken for purchase of a site and construction. The nationalised bank calls for an auction in its premises and sells the site to Mr.X in the auction. Mr.X has paid full consideration for the site but the bank has not yet registered the site in the name of Mr.X even after 22 months from the date of auction. When Mr.X verified the property documents which were with the bank which the bank did not give before the auction the bank did not have all the documents required for registration of the property in his X name. so Mr. X insisted the bank to induct the indemnity clause into the certificate of sale and to provide all the necessary documents required for registration but the bank is just deny Mr.x that they cannot give any documents nor they will induct the indemnity clause. When Mr.X verified a copy of the sale deed of Mr.A which Mr.X received from the bank , Mr.X came to know that the bank officials have released the loan to Mr.A even for construction when there is no construction at all and they are fearing that if they induct any indemnity clause they may be in trouble for any future problems that may araise in the future.

What measures can Mr.X take to get the site registered in his name?

Several requests to various officials of the bank have failed to get any response from the bank.(at the regional levels & h.o.level)

Oorappan   04 November 2008 at 13:20

Dispute b\w Resident and the association of an apartment

We are owner and resident in an apartment reseeding from April 1995.

In August 2000 apartment’s Association increased the monthly maintenance charge from 450 RS to 775 RS, to pay depth made by the earlier association committee.
****************************************
We paid the above maintenance for the month of August 2000 and we requested the Depth Details, Auditing Report and Bank transaction list of the association and they did not provide any information for the above.
We declined to pay the maintenance till they provide the requested information.
Association disconnected the water supply to my home on January 2001 (i.e. after the five months of declining to pay maintenance.) without providing the Requested information.
*****************************************
We filled a case on December 2001 at Court of the commissioner for people with disabilities as per the people with disability act 1995 as I am physically disabled person.
Then Case was dismissed on December 2006 saying that this is a personal and disability act will not apply to it.
*****************************************
We requested auditing report with District Registrar of the apartment’s association as per RTI act 2005.
They Furnished Registration Number (Association was registered October 1999) and bylaws for association, there was not auditing report filling as per District Registrar from the day of the Registration.
*****************************************
We requested bank transaction with the bank were the association has the account.
They denied saying that association did not permit to provide permission to provide the requested details.
******************************************
Please advice to solve the present problem legally