Sreenivas
20 March 2009 at 14:51
Gentlemen,
I had plans to purchase a flat from my cousin. We just did not enter into any formal agreement to sell.He needed funds to finalise a property deal.
I managed certain amount and the amount got deposited in to my account and I in turn gave my cousin 3cheques for the amt.
My friend who helped me cannot disclose the source of the ten.
Now I am applying for Bank loan and disposing my another flat.
I think I shall be subjected to scrutiny. How to deal with that ten...
advocate satya
20 March 2009 at 13:49
hi all
in one case the dispute of property arises, the one party cut the water and electric connection of other who is living at second floor, what is the remedy for the second party he dont want to file suit for property dispute but needs interim relief or order to get electricity and water, is it possible to file only interi relief pettion without any suit for dispute on property?
ponnala
20 March 2009 at 13:01
I am a woman from state of
Andhra Prsdesh.Knew Nothing about Legal
system functioning. And not in a position
to spend Heavey Amout. And want to have a
settlement at a faster Pace and also, know
the strength in my case.
Keeping in View of all above
facts/Situations, can i approach 'State
Legal Authority' and through, 'S L A' to
Lokadalat? If yes,I request the Forum
members to Suggest the procedure and
Address & Contact numbers in Andhra
pradesh State.
Thanking you all in advance...
seshachala
20 March 2009 at 12:34
sir please tell us about the applicable of esic to the transport provider for any company on the following points
1.If a company as hired a tranport provider and the transporter is covered under the esic can he subcontract the service
2.If the transport porvider is subcontracted the service to many other single owner(to say that he has heired vehicles for the sigle owners and attached the same).
3.If the subcontracted single owner vehicle is paid more than the ceiling limited payment (10000)will he be brought under the preview of esic
4.The subcontractor is giving the exclusive service to one single company
Apurva Kumar
20 March 2009 at 12:06
Can ny 1 provides me the citation of Navjot Sngh Sidhu famous case in which he was aquited afterwards, nd allowed later to contest election thou he was convicted! or complete fact nd judgement of d case!
Regards
Apurva!
advocate satya
20 March 2009 at 11:43
hi
if there is a case of cheque bounce and the limitations of three years is been passed, if the accused shows the cheque amount as in his income tax return will the limitations extends? i heard a recent judgement on this is it true? further i want to ask can the information of any person as to his income tax return can be got from income tax dept. under RTI?
Anonymous
20 March 2009 at 01:32
A Partnership Firm of Raipur city,got registered in Yr.1975 in Bhopal,as it is situated in M.P state.It is having all the five partners from a single family.Firm mortgaged its property in PNB Bank ,in which it was existing for RS 2 lacs in YR 1975.
In Yr 1978 our 3 members entered in the Firm as new partners and their 3 partners , out of 5,,retired,so in Yr 1978 ,we were having 60% share in the Firm,as per Partnership Deed,signed by all the parners
.
In YR 1979,the said Firm was fully taken by our family and 2 new partners from our family entered in the Firm.The remaining old partners retired from the said Firm and against them ,as i said 2 members of our family entered in the Firm.We are not having proof now,ki the remaining 2 partners retired in Yr 1979,as we are not having in present the documents which contains the retiring party signature,stating that they retired from the Firm, in yr 1979.
Our problem is know,is that since our all the senior partners,which joined in 1979,were staying at Madras,so they got registered the Firm in Chennai ,as having its Head office there,without doing anything in Bhopal Registration office.In bhopal Reg.office only initial Partnership deed was given of YR.1975,when we were not partners.So according to Bhopal's Registration still starting parties are the partner of our Firm.
Our new partnership deed which was Registerd by us in Chennai,is silent of the property of the Firm.
We took out the property of Firm,where it is existing ,which was mortaged by the old partners somewhere in yr 1981 and got realesed Title Deed from PNB Bank.(please note,we are not having evidense now that we got realesed the T.Deed papers,but we have evidense ki old partners kept it for mortgage)
We are in possession of the property since then.We are having Industrail License for yr 1980 onwards in our 1 partner name,on behalf of the said Firm, also have Electricity and muncipality proof also in our name from Yr 1979.We are also having tenants in the property since from more than last 15 yrs.
Our problem is that ki old partners taking advantage of their name still in bhopal Registration office,started claming in Yr 2006,ki our firm is some other firm with the same name,as it is registerd in Chennai and they tied up with some mafia for its sale of its property.
We filed Civil suit agaist the old parties,but our case is strucked ki how to confirm that our firm and the old firm is same .
According to our Advocate,we have to prove it in Civil Court,as Judge is asking the same.
Is there is no time limitation for old partners who are challenging after approx 27 yrs?
We submitted all the Documents showing that we are in possession of the property from last 27 yrs , and still we are in possession.
What can we do,please suggest us.
can we file now,in bhopal registration office that we have been already registered in Chennai,so we dont need the Bhopal's registration or can we submit our new Partnership deed with Bhopal Registration office and get Registration here also?Can we do registration in two places or in two states?,
Please gove your valuable opinion and oblidge.
Thanking you sirs.
yours faithfully,
Sanjay chandak.
9300061575
jagadhathri
19 March 2009 at 22:39
whether a married daughter can get marriage expenses as maintenance after her marriage from father under hindu law
jagadhathri
19 March 2009 at 22:29
3 brothers made partition deed and registered it. later one among them cancelled the said deed. whether he can cancell it without the interference of the court?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
difference between Act,rules and regulations
Dear all
Plz make understanding of following terms.
Act, Rules and Regulations
After making Act ,rule is prepared.,
Say Factories Act
Factories Rul
Another cast
After making Act, rules as well regulations are prepare
Say Esic Act
Esic rules
Esic regulations
My question is that what is relations and difference among them.
Why for some act ,act and rule are there but some other act , act ,rules and regulations are there.
Why such difference. Why rules and regulations are not attached with every act.