Uma Shankar
18 August 2009 at 19:52
If A purchased a commercial property situated in New Delhi from B in 1999. A paid transfer amount 3% of the consideration to MCD for getting property mutated in his name in 2003. Now A wants to get agreement to sell registered in his name and B is also ready for the same by paying 3% remaining stamp duty. But somebody told A that amount paid to MCD will not be adjusted in stamp duty as it is paid after 28.09.2001. Is there any circular/notification or rule?
aloy
18 August 2009 at 19:04
Case History
2001 Filed a case in Thanjavur civil court against the neighbor for interrupting the construction of staircase as he doesn't have wall for his house entrance, and according to the document the wall is on our boundry. We request the court to allow us to scale certain part of the wall to build our staircase.
2006 Got Judgment to proceed with our constriction in our premises accourding to our document produced to the court. Also reclaim the fund occurred as court expenses
We constructed the staircase by scale certain portion of the wall, on completion the opponent refused to work on their end leaving bricks seen and claim that their wall got damaged.
2006 Our Opponent filed a case district court that due to our construction their wall got damaged and they requested court to issue order to demolish staircase.
2009 today : District Court issued order to us to demolish the staircase within 3 months.
The wall is about 12 feet high and 8 feet long. the wall is in our premises and the opponent has no wall at all.
Any help / advise in this case is highly appreciated.
Many Thanks !
Raja
shamsuddin
18 August 2009 at 17:36
Perpetual injuction should be granted to the lawful tenant
ADRIAN B. D'MELLO
18 August 2009 at 17:32
I HAD FITTED AN A/C IN 2005, & THE ELECTRICIAN HAD TAMPERED WITH THE METER & RELIANCE ENERGY HAD NOTICED THE SAME. I PAID RELIANCE THE PENALTY/DIFFERENCE. THE SOCIETY M.C MADE AN ISSUE OF THIS AND TRIED RASING A PENALTY FROM ME, WHICH I REFUTED. THEY THEN TOOK A DECISION AND PASSED A RESOLUTION TO DEBAR ME FROM JOINING THE M.C FOR LIFE. I APPROACHED THE HSG. FEDERATION & THEY GAVE ME A LETTER IN WRITING THAT SINCE THIS WAS A PERSONNAL ISSUE & RELIANCE HAD CHARGED ME FOR THE SAME, THE M.C HAD NO RIGHT TO DEBAR ME. SUBSEQUENTLY THEY WERE HARRASSING ME BY PASSING COMMENTS. AT THE AGM HELD ON 9.8.09 SOME MEMBERS PROPOSED MY NAME AS CHAIRMAN SINCE I HAD SERVED THE SOCIETY FOR 18 YEARS, BUT SOME MEMBERS ONCE AGAIN STATED THAT SINCE I HAVE BEEN DEBARRED I COULD NOT BECOME A MEMBER OF THE MC, OR HOLD ANY POST. SINCE THEY HAVE BROUGHT THE SOCIETY TO LOSS FOR THE PAST 3 YRS, MOST OF THE MEMBERS HAVE LOST CONFIDENCE IN THEM , BUT THEY ARE SCARED TO SAY DIRECTLY BECAUSE OF THE DADAGIRI ATTITUDE. I REQUEST YOU TO GUIDE ME HOW TO CLOSE THE ISSUE ONCE & FOR ALL & TELL THEM THAT THEY ARE WRONG. AN EARLY REPLY & GUIDANCE WILL HIGHLY BE APPRECIATED.
THANKS & REGARDS: ADRIAN D'MELLO
ADRIAN B. D'MELLO
18 August 2009 at 17:30
I HAD FITTED AN A/C IN 2005, & THE ELECTRICIAN HAD TAMPERED WITH THE METER & RELIANCE ENERGY HAD NOTICED THE SAME. I PAID RELIANCE THE PENALTY/DIFFERENCE. THE SOCIETY M.C MADE AN ISSUE OF THIS AND TRIED RASING A PENALTY FROM ME, WHICH I REFUTED. THEY THEN TOOK A DECISION AND PASSED A RESOLUTION TO DEBAR ME FROM JOINING THE M.C FOR LIFE. I APPROACHED THE HSG. FEDERATION & THEY GAVE ME A LETTER IN WRITING THAT SINCE THIS WAS A PERSONNAL ISSUE & RELIANCE HAD CHARGED ME FOR THE SAME, THE M.C HAD NO RIGHT TO DEBAR ME. SUBSEQUENTLY THEY WERE HARRASSING ME BY PASSING COMMENTS. AT THE AGM HELD ON 9.8.09 SOME MEMBERS PROPOSED MY NAME AS CHAIRMAN SINCE I HAD SERVED THE SOCIETY FOR 18 YEARS, BUT SOME MEMBERS ONCE AGAIN STATED THAT SINCE I HAVE BEEN DEBARRED I COULD NOT BECOME A MEMBER OF THE MC, OR HOLD ANY POST. SINCE THEY HAVE BROUGHT THE SOCIETY TO LOSS FOR THE PAST 3 YRS, MOST OF THE MEMBERS HAVE LOST CONFIDENCE IN THEM , BUT THEY ARE SCARED TO SAY DIRECTLY BECAUSE OF THE DADAGIRI ATTITUDE. I REQUEST YOU TO GUIDE ME HOW TO CLOSE THE ISSUE ONCE & FOR ALL & TELL THEM THAT THEY ARE WRONG. AN EARLY REPLY & GUIDANCE WILL HIGHLY BE APPRECIATED.
THANKS & REGARDS: ADRIAN D'MELLO
AMIT KARIA
18 August 2009 at 17:03
I was working as a Company Secretary in a company & on 19th July,2009 I resigned by giving proper notice. Then I joined a new co. as their CS.
But the concerned persons in the previous co. despite repeated requests are not filing the required Form 32 for my cessation from their secretaryship. Because of this, i'm unable to file my fresh Form 32 for the new co.
What action should I take against the co.?
anil
18 August 2009 at 16:13
Hi,
One of colleagues is in UK and had a marriage affidavit and now he would like to take marriage certificate so as to apply depedant work permit for his wife. Is it possible in his absense to have marriage registration can happen. Please advise.
Best Regards
Anil
Mehul K Ghedia
18 August 2009 at 15:35
Thanks in advance,
I am planning to buy a resale flat in the Registered Co-Op-Hsg Soc. in the western suburb of mumbai.
The society has been registered since 2006.
The conveyance deed has not been executed in favour of the society by the builder. so i want to know what is the implication/ legal consequnces of the same. is it ok to purchase the flat in such society?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
trans border terrorism
HON'BLE PRIME MINISTER expressed concern thyat trns border terrorism is greatest threat to our country. the terroristds intrude by sea and water usng radio transmitters. this helps terrorists evade detection. if radios are made banned by international law and communication is done only by alternative mode like mobile phone through sattelites can we expect a better result?