Vikas Kr. Sinha
31 August 2009 at 07:55
Dear all,
Please give me any citation, where BSNL is held to be an "Establishment" within the meaning of definition under Shops & Establishments Act.
Vikas.
vinod bansal
30 August 2009 at 22:48
Respected Members
Kindly help me in above stated matter,I filed a crl complaint uss 323/506 IPC & magistrate at the stage of framing of charge ,discharged the accused from all allegations,now i want to challenge this order of discharge/aquittal before sessions court ,i have to file appeal or revision against this order,I am highly confused regarding differences (Definations)of Appeal /Revision & Interlocutary orders,i have go through so many citations but all proved futile. plz explain me & enlighten me at this law point,So Thanx in antipitation n Regards.
Vinod Bansal Advocate
vinod bansal
30 August 2009 at 22:32
R/Members
My A/bail application under above sections is pending for 1-9-9 before sessions court ,embezzled amount is Rs. 18000/-my client/petitioner is also a old patient of epilepsy,kindly provide me any citation for bail.Thanx
vinod bansal
30 August 2009 at 22:28
R/Members
Will anyone plz provide me legal Dictionary (for downloading)Thanx in anticipation
vinod bansal
30 August 2009 at 22:27
R/Members
Will anyone plz provide me legal Dictionary (for downloading)Thanx in antipitation
tdeli
30 August 2009 at 21:41
I have to defend an appeal at ITAT .Can anyone please answer my queries..
1.In paper book form one has to file all those papers and evidences which one had filed before the assessing officer and CIT Appeals . Can one file Brief history of the case along with the paper book as it was not part of the the papers filed before the lower authorities.
2.Do one needs to file compilation along with paper book or can one file it later.
SUBHASH SHARMA
30 August 2009 at 21:22
ONE OF MY CLIENT HAS PRINTING PRESS AT SHAHDARA HAS RECEIVED A SUMMON OF CRIMINAL/FAUJDARI SECTION 61 FROM AMITABH RAWAT D.J.S. METROPOLITAN MEGISTRATE ( MUNICIPAL)-01, KARKARDOOMA, DLEHI.
IT HAS BEEN MENTINOED THAT, YOUR PRESENCE IN COURT IS MENDATORY IN THE OFFENCE OF 416(41). YOU HAVE TO PRESENT AT THE ABOVE COURT EITHER YOURSELF OR WITH YOUR ADVOCATE AS IT IS REQUIRED.
KINDLY SUGGEST WHAT TO DO
SUBHASH SHARMA
ADVOCATE
M-9891338895
monika
30 August 2009 at 21:20
can a person be trustee of two or more charitable , educational trusts/ and can a same person be chairman of two trusts
Rajneesh Madhok
30 August 2009 at 20:08
False case registered and the person kept in illegal confinement REGISTERED CASE UNDER SECTION 107/151.THIS TIME ARRESTED WITH NO OFFENCE.
PREVIOUSLY THE ACCUSED HAD BEEN PENALIZED UNDER PULIC REPRESENTATIVE ACT IN 2007.
Sir,
Cops of Punjab Police detained a person and kept him in confinement. The matter was reported to quite a number of authorities The case was that a person Viz A had helped the old ladies to cast their vote in the last assembly elections held in the year of 2007 by providing conveyance up to the polling booth. In that case the case had been registered against him and him was penalized for Rs. 1,000/-. The case is over.
Now we come to the point. In this parliamentary elections. The said person A became the victim of Punjab Police. The police keep on harassing him, keep on putting him in illegal confinement. The procedure of harassment did not come to end.
The victim (offender in the name of Punjab Police) reported the matter vide E-mails, Speed post to different authorities from Punjab police officials, President of India, Vice President of India, Chief Secretary and all the concerned officials of Ministry of Home Affairs. But in vain.
One day in early hours A was picked up from his house with police force and again kept in confinement. The police replied to the query filed under RTI act that the reasons of taking actions are as under.
PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONCHANDIGARHComplaint No: 8084/9/2009 Present : Complainant Kulwinder Ram with Shri Rajneesh Madhok Report dated 21.8.2009 from SSP Kapurthala has been received through A.D.G.P/IVC-Cum-Human Rights, wherein the allegations of the complainant have been refuted and found false. It is reported that during the Lok Sabha Elections in 2009 there were instructions from the Election Commission that preventive action be taken against all the Bad Chracter persons and those against whom cases were registered during the last elections. Since case FIR No. 29 dated 13.2.2007 was registered against complainant Kulwinder Ram at PS Sadar, Phagwara, during the last elections, he was arrested and produced before the SDM while taking action under Sections 107/151 Cr.P.C. A copy of this order along with a copy of the said report be sent to the complainant for filing the rejoinder by the next date, failing which the complaint would be finally disposed of in accordance with law. Adjourned to 13.11.2009. Date: 24.8.2009 Sd/-“SONI” Justice Baldev Singh Member Now the points to be considered:1. Sec. 107/151 is regarding MINOR DISPUTE of two parties. In this case the convict who had been put behind bars twice and has to get bail has not made any offence. In the last assembly elections he had helped the old ladies of the village to caste their vote by providing transportation in his car. In this offence he had been convicted and had been fined for Rs 1,000 in the 1997. Whether he became law offender and there is a great problem if he scot free during elections and there will be the law and order maintenance problem. 2. Sec 144 is applicable on Law and order problems. Why the person put behind bars and placed in lock up and still the police department says that it is according to the instructions by the Election commission. REPLY OF PUNJAB POLICE SUBMITTED TO THE COMPLAINANT From Senior Supdtt. Of Police, 24/8/2009 Kapurthala, To Registrar, Human Rights Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh !No. : 1770-P Dated 21-8-09 Sub Regarding: Shri Rajneesh Madhok, Nehru Park, resident of Gali No. 2, Railway
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Need Help in divorce matter?
Husband has filed a divorce petition in family court against his wife and he has stated that her wife is living separately since last 2 yrs. Also alleged that his wife was not obeying him when she was living with him and come home late night and didnt help her mother in law in household works. It is the second marriage of wife her 1st husband died.She has 2 issues from 1st husband.Here wife doesnt want divorce my question is what will be the suitable reply to husband's petition.Can court pass order of divorce against wife's will?What could be the judgement?[both r Hindu]