monika
03 October 2009 at 23:25
could any one tell me that if a show cause notice is served to a wrong person would that be sufficient or can it be taken as a plea that it has been served to a wrong person actual position is that some repair works were going on in a land the municipal authorities have served a notice to the real sister of the perso to whom the land actually belongs what can be done please help
Amandeep Singh
03 October 2009 at 22:12
Sir
I need a suggestion that if a senior citizen widow signed a compromise decree in the court under undue influence exerted by one of her sons and under which her right to stay in the deceased husband's property has been withdrawn. Is there any provision under the above act or any other provision which can save her right to stay in the same property.
Amandeep Singh
03 October 2009 at 22:06
Sir
I need a suggestion if a appeal for challenging compromise decree under the above said rule or section is made then what are the main factors to be taken into consideration for getting the appeal to set aside the said compromise which was signed in the court and whether medical grounds can be used for showing that decree was entered under undue influence or the pressure exerted by the other party who had lodged false police complaints against us which were subsequently withdrawn after the compromise was signed or is there any other provision under CPC to set aside or challenge the compromise decree.
Suresh C Mishra
03 October 2009 at 21:15
In an industrial dispute before labour court Lko the LC has decided the case of daily wager who has completed more than one year of conitunuty of service with Mandi Parishad Lucknow The Mandi Parishad has opposed the reference on the basis that the the services of the workman were in a project and he is not entitled for the benefit of section 6 N of UPID Act , 1947
The Labour Court after evidence of the workman closed the case on the basis of a Case with regard to the regularisation of the same department which was based on the case of UMA Devi ( Supra ) holding that the appointment of the daily wager was not in accordance with the due procedure and there fore he is not entitled for any relief . I have decided to move in HC Lko and I have drafted a WP which is attached Please comemnt and suggest me what other to add to succeed in the matter
Suresh C Mishra
03 October 2009 at 21:12
In an industrial dispute before labour court Lko the LC has decided the case of daily wager who has completed more than one year of conitunuty of service with Mandi Parishad Lucknow The Mandi Parishad has opposed the reference on the basis that the the services of the workman were in a project and he is not entitled for the benefit of section 6 N of UPID Act , 1947
The Labour Court after evidence of the workman closed the case on the basis of a Case with regard to the regularisation of the same department which was based on the case of UMA Devi ( Supra ) holding that the appointment of the daily wager was not in accordance with the due procedure and there fore he is not entitled for any relief . I have decided to move in HC Lko and I have drafted a WP which is attached Please comemnt and suggest me what other to add to succeed in the matter
Suresh C Mishra
03 October 2009 at 21:01
Is the act of Disclosing their Assets Publically by some of the judges is Justified When Such A matter has created disputes in the country and the matter has been getting some luke warm responses.
Sachin Bhatia
03 October 2009 at 20:03
a) know more than others.
b) work more than others
C) expect less then others...
Devendra Gosar
03 October 2009 at 19:57
I had tried posting my query twice earlier yesterday but can't see it so posting it again.
On 1st Oct there was an accident caused by a commercial car just about 10 m ahead of my car. This happened on the Bombay-Pune road near Bhosari, where the road is pretty wide. The other car collided with a 2-wheeler and the girl riding the 2-wheeler suffered some injuries on her face and hands. She is ok now.
I was driving on extreme right lane and was quite away from the colliding vehicles. However, to ensure I do not hit the falling girl and the 2-wheeler I stopped immediately.
Unfortunately for me, the other car driver instantly accused that it was my car's back that hit the 2-wheeler and because of which it collided with his car. I have an old dent in the rear bumper which came in handy for them. The police has belived in that and has slapped sections 279 and 337 on me.
Police has not taken my statement and are in no mood of listening to me. They say make any arguments you want in the court. I reconciled to the fact that probably the other car owner must be very influential or would have bribed significantly and they need to find some scapegoat.
The 2-wheeler never hit my car and there is not even a single scratch to my car. The girl's family belives me but they also informed me that probably police has also twisted the girl's statement by ommitting key facts (like the long car hit her from left - mine is a hatchback and it was on right lane).
Yesterday I could find some digital snaps taken in Aug that show the dent in the rear bump. My car servicing invoice of May 2009 also has a remark of the same dent.
I need some help to understand what should be my next step.
1. Shall I just accept to the charges and get over with it with the fines? Most of the folks have suggested the same to me so far.
2. Shall I meet up with the sr police officers in the police station and make them aware of the new prrofs I have found on the old dent on my car and request them to reinvestigate the matter?
3. Shall I first get a bail and then press for finding the truth?
4. The constable at the police station has been threatening me that he would put me in lockup. Fortunately he has let me go on 1st and the 2nd Oct. He repeatedly called on 3rd Oct offering to 'settle' the things and I can also get my vehicle back. I have so far avoided that. He has not clarified how he will settle the things.
5. The constable had also mentioned about the medical check-up. I am not too sure why it would be needed now and not on the day of the accident.
Police has not taken my statement, neither they have given me any copy of the FIR or panchnama. The investigating officer has not even spoken to me.
Requesting this forum of experts to put forward their opinions and advices for me.
Thanks in advance!
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maintainance under Hindu marriage act
Wife is prof qualified and is earning but she is earning much less than her husband. Can she claim any maintainence or alimony from her husband in case of divorce. If yes, under which act and under which section/ case law. Please advise in detail.