Nishant Khosla
09 October 2009 at 11:39
i wanted to know the full facts of the case like the persons who went along with virsa singh were having any kind of weapons in their hand i want the full case full facts pl its urgent.
ponnala
09 October 2009 at 10:39
Dear Experts of forum,
This case pertains to A P , and i was told that the Probation of will is not necessary in Andhra Pradesh State. Is it true?
And friends i need clarification;In this case the property had come to Legatee from a Widower.Where she distributes Two Sy. Nos. say 1 & 2 among the Three persons, includes her i)Daughter, ii)Son-in-law, and iii)son-in- law's adopted son's Wife, And further in the will she uses the sentence, that " all my remaining lands which are either in my personal cultivation or under tenants are bequeathed to Shri.****(Legatee)"Mr. X", after my life time he shall take appropriate proceedings for either recovery of the land or of compensation from the persons in occupation and take possession of lands which are under my occupation "
Here again some of the lands were with her own son-in-law "Mr.Y"( Under occupation since 1953, not parted under any instrument).(She has only one Daughter, And the legatee is Son-in-law's Brother).
In the above contest who owns the Property, And During the Life time of "Mr.Y",he disposed of the lands under his Occupation . Can this act, of his (i.e "Mr.Y") is proper in view of The Will?
Kindly Guide me.
With regards....
Adinath@Avinash Patil
09 October 2009 at 08:39
THIS IS FOR RECENTLY ASKED QUERY REGADING FOREIN CHEQUE DIHONURED AND ALL LEARNED MEMBERS LAWYERS CLUB OF INDIA.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT A881-- SRCTIONS 138,135,136,137--DISHONURE OF CHEQUE-PRESUMPTION ABOUT FOREIGN LAW AND TERRITORIAL JUEISDICTION--CHEQQUE DRAWN ON FOREIGN BANK IN SINGAPORE-PRESENTED BY COMPLAINANT AT MADRAS IN INDIA WHERE HIS COMPANY IS SITUATED -COMPLAIT HAS NO ACCOUNT IN ANY BANK IN SINGAPORE-SECTION 136 AND 137 ARE SUFFICIENTSAFE GUARDS FOR COMPAIES IN INDIA TO PROCEED AGAINST FOREIGN COMPANIES -IF INSTRUMENTS DISHONURED- NO BAR FOR PROSECUTION IN INDIA.
TRILUX TECHNOLOGY SINGAPORE PVT.LTD.V/S BOOM TECHNOLOGIES REP.BY ITS MANAGER.
DECIDED ON.29/03/2004. MADRAS HIGH COURT.
2004 DCR 642.
ravi pratap sharma
09 October 2009 at 08:02
My dad (Army Retd.)unfortunately died on feb09 and hence my mom started getting a family pension. I want to know about which ITR and the taxing, what benefits can be claimed, what if the 1 lac limit in s.80 is not claimed any other way like gift to her son, or daughter in law or grandson. what are other benifits if the annual income comes to 3lac including "income from other sources" eg interest, income from house rent etc.
tapan ketan das
09 October 2009 at 06:54
How the VAT & Entry Tax return forms can be downloaded in computer & can be used (copied & pasted) for filing of monthly returns of different parties ?
Adinath@Avinash Patil
09 October 2009 at 05:44
IMPORTANT CASE LAW FOR ADVOCATES
ADVOCATES ACT, 1961,RULES FRAMED BY BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA, RULE 49[2]-BAR OF-AMBIT OF- MAIN AND OPENING PARAGRAPH OF THE RULE PROHIBITS OR BARS AN ADVOCATE FROM BEING A FULL TIME SALARIED EMPLOYEE OF ANY PERSON, GOVRMENT,FIRM,CORPORATION OR CONCERNED SO LONG AS HE CONTINUES TO PRACTICE -AN OBLIGATION IS CAST ON AN ADVOCATE WHO TAKES UP ANY SUCH EMPLOYMENT TO INTIMATE THE FACTS TO CONCERNED BAR COUNCIL- SUCH ADVOCATE SHALL CEASE TO PRACTICE SO LONG AS CONTINUES HE CONTINUE IN SUCH EMPLOMENT -SUCH BAR CREATED IN PARA 1 OF RULE 49 WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE TO LAW OFFICER OR CENTRAL OR STATE GOVERMENT OR ANY PUBLIC CORPORATION OR BODY CONSTITUTED BY A STATUTE, IF THEY ARE GIVEN ENTITLEMENT UNDER THE RULE OF THEIR STATE BAR COUNCIL.
SATISH KUMAR SHARMA V/S THE BAR COUNCIL OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2001 SAR [CIVIL] 277 [ S.C.]
DECIDED ON 03/01/2001.
ABC.......
09 October 2009 at 02:07
Wife has been harassed by her husband and due to continous dowry demands by her husband and inlaws, she wants to lodge an FIR and fight case against her husband inspite of the fact that a lot of time is usually spent till decision by court. Please advice on what all I should do.
yeteendra naidu
09 October 2009 at 01:02
in a transaction which we came across recently found the name of the buyer who entered into an agreement of sale with the seller and got the buyer's name recorded in the Encumbarance certificate. The transaction
bypassed the co-op society thru which the transfer should normally be processed. The sale deed is yet to be registered. under the circumstances can the EC prove one's ownership ? and is correct to issue an EC without registration of sale deed & non payment of required stamp duty.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Substitution of complainant representative
My query is as follows:
There is a company which is pursuing legal action against an individual in a magistrate court. The authorised representative of the company stood for examination-in-chief. Thereafter the authorised representative of the company stood for cross-examination, and before the cross examination was completed, the said authorised representative left the services of the company.
When a new representative of the company is subtituted to appear in place of the original person, will the already completed examination-in-chief, and the partially completed cross-examination continue to stand, or will the examination-in-chief and cross-examination have to be conducted afresh?
Thanks