Anonymous
22 November 2009 at 22:21
Sir, Prilinary issue about fairness of enq. by employer who will lead first ? Judgement on this ?
Suresh C Mishra
22 November 2009 at 22:18
Sir, Prilinary issue about fairness of enq. by employer who will lead first ? Judgement on this ?
Anonymous
22 November 2009 at 21:43
Dear sir
how can i use section 340 crpc in divorce case filed by my client's wife as she has wrote different stories in 498a and now in divorce case on same pretext?
P.C. Joshi
22 November 2009 at 21:20
Friends,
I seek your guidance on the following issue.
A Ltd has filed two criminal suits abainst B for dishonour of two cheques. The cases are pending before the court.
B had earlier made payment by three drafts(prior to dishonour of the cheques in question). In the court B's produced copies of those DDs alongwith a covering letter stating that the DDs are gainst the dishonoured cheques. But this is not ture the DDs are aganist other dues and no such letter was given by B to a ltd. The court asks for evidence of A ltd either to accept or deny B's statement.
I want to know ;
In this case on whom burdon of proving genuineness of B claim lie whether on A Ltd or B.
What legal defences is available to A Ltd.
Regards
P.c. Joshi
Kamal Grover
22 November 2009 at 21:06
Supreme court has decided a new case wherein the court has decided that even after getting the clean chit from the police, court can summon or person can approach to the court.
Anonymous
22 November 2009 at 20:02
we had taken workmen compensation from a insurance co. showing salary of Rs. 4000/- per month to each worker. But the actual salary now exceeds from this amount. Please advice me that in the cicumstances we may claim wc from insurance company because due to above mentioned differences they may refuse for claim
Anonymous
22 November 2009 at 19:24
SIR ,I am a eloctrinic dealer at Moradabad u.p. and facin case under 138 in karkarduma court delhi. An electronic co filed case against me in spite of replacing defective goods as they have my cheque case is 4 years old and i am on bail,Co.was having office at sahibabad and noida and no connection was from delhibut they still filed case in delhi ,i has read some ruling by delhi high court that outstation 138 cases should go outside delhi but my lawer refuses for thatand says there is no such ruling .iwant to know that is my lawer is right and if not how can i trasfer this case to moradabad or ghaziabad,also i am in need of a lawer in delhi.thanks
astha
22 November 2009 at 19:13
want to find out citation using case no. of high court. not available at sites judis.nic.in or indiakanoon.com as suggested by experts.intimate some effective means find citation for MAC. APP. No.350/2005 delhi hicourt judgement date 15 may 2007
Anonymous
22 November 2009 at 18:58
I just wanted to know about the NOC, that is used to express the no objection of one party relating to the transfer of the property to another party. I wanted to know what is NOC, whether it can be typed on a plain paper, or on a stamp paper, or if there is a prescribed form relating to NOC.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
domestic enq and enquiry officer
In my case on PI of fairness of Enq. The workman appeared first and lead evidence but the employer says that Enq. Officer is not available for witness on PI , what will be effect if EO will not present ? whether employer can lead secondary evidence on PI > Please rePly with judgement on this issue