Rajneesh Madhok
16 November 2009 at 20:49
Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
I got this E-mail from Mrs. Madhumita Sadhukhan, the tale of a quack practicing in Delhi and claims himself a doctor from AIIMS and the details has been attached. There seems to be no one to listen to the pleadings of the wailing mother who had been looted by the quack and the police and medical council of India don’t take action on the said quack. I pray to the Indian Medical Association anti-quackery Cell to kindly take action and provide justice to the wailing mother.
When it has been proved that the doctor who specifies himself a doctor and is practicing and the police complaint has been lodged against this fraud doctor then why not the police department and medical department take action against him. It is a great set back to general public and secondly it causes harm to the patients and the public Medical code of Ethics has specifically mentioned that no doctor is allowed to practice and should not claim to show miracle in treatment But there is no check on this type of quacks. Why not the Delhi Medical Association doctors come forward when all the evidences are being put by Mrs. Madhumita.
Why the tale of this self proclaimed miracle-cure provider ends here and why our Government set such quacks free to cure the chronic patients from dreaded diseases.
When the mother demands action against the quack doctor, DMA the medical professionals and general public should come forward to help her in providing justice to her by putting pressure on the Govt. machinery to take action against the quack doctor. We should keep our fingers crossed in a hope that the common man does not fall prey to such type of quacks.
The tale is as under: --------------Rajneesh Madhok, B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar, St. No. 2, Railway Road, Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Madhumita Sadhukhan
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:32 PM
Subject: Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
To: dirdhs@nic.in
Dear Rajnish,
I, Madhumita Sadhukhan resident of Dhanbad sending you all the documents of the fraud who claims himself to be a doctor of AIIMS and who treated my son, Indranil Sadhukhan wrongly who is a chronic kidney patient. My son was previously treated at CMC Vellore and was under dialysis.
Through one of our distant relative Mrs Ishani Banerjee R/O Kalkaji we came to know about this fraud doctor. He assured us that my son would soon recover. He stopped his dialysis and started giving medicines which resulted in worsening condition of my son.
After enquiry we came to know that there is no such doctor called Supriyo Mukherjee at AIIMS.
Finally, at the eleventh hour we rushed to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Delhi where after 8 days his condition became stabled.
We lodged an F.I.R against this fraud at Hari Nagar police station on 12/10/09 but no action has been taken till date. A criminal like him who is playing with the lives of critical patients should be immediately put behind the the bars.
Thanks for your kind cooperation and help. Hope our joint effort will deffinately save some more lives.
Thanking You
Madhumita Sadhukhan
Contact no : 09709023765
09661872818
NOTE : I am sending you all the scanned documents along with the photographs of the alleged fraud.
Anonymous
16 November 2009 at 20:42
Dear sir,
it is to draw your kind attention that my client got divorce notice,as sent by his wife,now i want to know about one thing that,
a his wife wrote in petition that my client/her husband had procured a false degree to get a job before 3years.
my query is this how can i defend my client if it is true.
how can my client be saved from this type of allegation?
Anonymous
16 November 2009 at 20:24
What is the nature of copyright on the internet? Analyse the remedies available against infringement of copyright.
Isha Arora
16 November 2009 at 20:21
What are the protections being offered to registered trademark owners? Give Case Laws too.
Kindly give a detailed explanation.
I will be highly obliged.
Thank u.
anckoora
16 November 2009 at 19:09
dear sir,
I would like to know : (a) Ceiling for deduction of PF & ESIC from the employee's salary. (b) pl. suggest sutable website for knowing deeply on this two.
thanks in advance.
ankur
Anonymous
16 November 2009 at 18:49
I got married in the month of July 2009. And since very 1st day of marriage she started to fight for one or other reason like she was problem with living with my family member, few days I have ignore it and its may be new place and new family member and it will some time to accept it. But day by day she curtly was increasing. she want to left the my father house but its very difficult to me to do so hence my parents and sister are totally depend on me, me and my family member also tried our level best. Every time she threaten me and my family to if I not listen to her then she was call the police, I have also contract with her parents regarding the same problem many time but problem was still remain.. She was disturb me on every night when I an sleeping, he try to talk with me on forcefully even I also told... its effect I face on office work… she want I take psychically action against her and then she was go to police station or negotiation with me to listen her all demand.. Her family member also no all the thing but respond is zero... After one month she has gone to her mother place with her brother … after few day she call me and told me for same If I not listen her demand then she threat for my life and my family.. I have also told her to its not possible to living with her in this scenario… I have also contact with her relative for the same Issue but all are back fire me and If I not living with her then her family will take legal action against me… and file dowry harassment and curtly case against me and my family…
I have some call recoding of conversation between me and my wife…. Where she was threaten and blackmailing me … In this scenario what is my option to get separation with my wife and avid any false case against me???? Pl suggests me…
Gopal Ranjan Panigrahi
16 November 2009 at 18:44
Sirs,
A property was purchsed in name of Mohemmedan Husband & wife. In between the husband expired.Whether the Mohemmedan wife alone can sell the property to another person.If not what permission and from whom should be taken prior to sale of such property by such Mohemmedan wife .
Thanking You
vaidee
16 November 2009 at 18:37
Dear Experts,
sec 164 of companies Act, suggest we can take copy of extracts of balance sheet and annual returns filed - whether it is applicable for private limited company and who can apply for the same.
Iqbal Singh
16 November 2009 at 18:26
There is a case in front of me where in two companies are the co-owners of the same land (say 10000 sq mtrs). Both are companies are group company. Amongst both company, one company is public limited company (LISTED) (named A having 40% share in land) and other is also Limited company (UNLISTED) (named B having 60% share in land). A and B have bifurcated their area with embarking the different sale deed specifying the area. Now A and B company has borrowed loan from Bank. Same piece of land will be mortgaged with both the bankers. According to one of the Advocate, both the company has to execute the mortgage deed on full 10000 sq mtrs of land rather than on their share as its difficulat to set boundaries for both the companies. Option given by the advocate are:
1. Execute separate sale deed demarking the area or
2. Pass a board resolution by both the companies (for full area of land) and both the companies will have to present during mortgage execution.
First iption is not feasible due to some mangement option. However, if second option is opted for, the concerned of A company is that it will amount to Corporate guarantee given by one company to another and prior approval of Central governemet will be required in case of A company.
Kindly let me know if the above is true. If yes, is there any notification or section is available which can avoid taking prior approval of Central government for execution of Mortgage deed.
Please do the needful and its required urgently.
Thanks
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
subsequent events
Dire need of citation for Kedar Nath Agarwal v. Dhanraj Devi, (2005) SCCR 24. This deals with subsequent events in ejectment cases. The citation I have is SCCR but this stands for Supreme Court Criminal Ruling. Is the citation correct?