Hari.K
12 December 2009 at 12:10
I retired after attaining the age of superannuation (i.e.) 58 years. I am getting past service benefit under FPS1971 is Rs.382, & pension of Rs.1207/-.My eligible service was 32 years.My past service upto 15/11/95 was 18 years. Actual service after (pension scheme implemented)15/11/95 was 13 yrs. 8 months 11 days. But EPFO Chennai, has taken into account my pension service only 13 years. When I asked them they told that they have received orders from Govt. from February 09,as it should be taken as pensionable service only 13 years. Hence I am losing 8 months 11 days of service and proportionate pension amount. Will it be correct?
NAYAN THAKORE
12 December 2009 at 11:39
Madam / Sir
I have only put the query on 2 occasions and on both the occasions the question I asked was different.
There is no need for anybody to be upset and I am not joking at all
My present query is CAN YOU PROVIDE ME NAMES OF LAWYERS CONVERSANT WITH PROPERTY LAW IN MUMBAI SUBURB OF ANDHERI.
It is a major problem if one has to look for accomodation when one is near retirement age and prices have skyrocketed
Thanks and regards
Nayan
Anonymous
12 December 2009 at 11:35
Sir,
i had named my baby boy in the birth certificate in Chandigarh. Now due to some problem I want to change the nae but the Chandigarh Birth & Death department says that I can not change the name of my minor son. Sir, please suggest me how can I change the name. Please tell me about the procedure and legal documents used and also their wordings.
Thanking you
Anonymous
12 December 2009 at 11:27
Sir,
i had named my baby boy in the birth certificate in Chandigarh. Now due to some problem I want to change the nae but the Chandigarh Birth & Death department says that I can not change the name of my minor son. Sir, please suggest me how can I change the name. Please tell me about the procedure and legal documents used and also their wordings.
Thanking you
Anonymous
12 December 2009 at 11:00
Dear sir,
We was appointed as sale promoter of a company in 1997 and at that time we had deposited Rs.6,00,000=00 as security deposit. Due to conflict the company had closed the business and files two cases against us under NI Act 138 without finalized any of accounts.
In the year 2003 they gave us a notice to confirm the deposits as on 31st march 1998 for income tax purpose.On the basis of that latter we filled a case for recovery of security deposits in court of law.
Now the company is saying that:
A. It is time bar case( Out of civil limitation)
B. They had forfeited the amount in sept. 1998.
Now the facts are as under:
A. There is no any communication about security amount from both the end till the date of first notice given by us in the year 2003.
B. In the reply of notice for refund they had not mentioned about the forfeiture
C.They had not produced any book of account about the security deposits( As they were maintains two books for their transaction one for business related and another for security deposits.
Can you help me in the matter by citing any of cases in this regards from any of higher court of India.
With Regards
Vijay Bhutda
00919341053313
Sachin
12 December 2009 at 02:11
Hi,
I have passed my LL.B. degree in May 2008 from Mumbai University and have currently moved to the USA. Do I need to be physically present in Mumbai if I need to apply for the SANAD in Mumbai(i.e. Mah & Goa Bar) or is it possible to send my representative and the required documentation & fees. I need to apply for the California Bar exam and need to submit proof of admittance in India. Its not possible for me to travel back to India at this time. Also, I would be ok if I need to provide any Notarized Authorization (US Notary) to my brother or father to do the requisite documentation. Any advise or information would be greatly appreciated.
Thanking you in anticipation.
Regards,
Sachin Sawant
Prem Dhawan
11 December 2009 at 23:42
Hi,
Does anyone know about Fixed deposit holders' case related to Morepan laboratories?
I am one of the deposit holders and haven't received the refund yet. I came to know that court has directed Morepan to issue equity shares but I haven't received the shares yet.
Is anyone in same boat?
Has anyone received the shares?
Thanks for sharing and guiding.
joyce
11 December 2009 at 23:29
Raj sir and Ramesh sir excuse me for repeating the querry as I want to make my querry more clear n specific. here i go...
Mr Ramesh, I am joyce, a lady. thanks for the reply. I know the meaning of juridiction, but in one of my case mvc is filed at other district where accident took at anothre distrct,& parties reside again in other different district, So hw can this petiton be tried? to be clear: Accident at Mangalore, parties resides at Bagalkot dist, filed at Gadag dist. Can it be entertained by Gadag court is my querry?
Prem Dhawan
11 December 2009 at 23:28
Hi,
I am sure lot of people/lawyers here know about MTECH developer/builder. They collected registration money for the properties in and around Gurgaon/Rajasthan but could not develop the properties and the money hasn't been refunded yet.
Lots of people might have filed suits against the builder. I am also one of those who registered in those properties but I am yet to file a case.
Before I file the case, I would like to know others' opinion. Is anyone here impacted also? Do you know anyone else who is fighting the case?
I am also looking for a good lawyer to file and fight my case in Delhi/New Delhi. Please contact me on my email.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Partnership firm
What is the document from which I can judge whether a partnership is a registered partnership firm or an unregistered partnership firm and how to judge from the document