ss
12 December 2009 at 21:41
In an accident case the deceased died due to head injuries and that too for non wearing of helmet. I would request you to clarify my following querries:-
1. What are the rules made by the Govt. of India which makes mandatory for everybody to wear helmet while driving scooter?
2. If a person dies due to non wearing of helmet and succumbed head injuries in such circumstances who will be held guilty?
3. Is is not mandatory on the part of I.O to mention about recovery or non recovery of helmet from the accident spot since the person concerned died due to head injury?
4. The I.O initially mentioned that he did not found any eyewitness when he first visited the accident site but later on named a person as eyewitness. This fact also mentioned in the FIR. Pl. advise me is it right step taken by the I.O, if not can you refer any judgement on the above subject?
ss
12 December 2009 at 21:25
In a property case the court granted permanent injunction for one of the floor in favour of the plaintiff. In a sudden development the defendants are trying to dispose off the property to builder secretly i.e. two floors which are under their occupation. Please advise me what sort of action is required for obtaining stay on the entire property. Thanks
ss
12 December 2009 at 21:20
An official who had served in para-military force in Delhi and permanent resident of Kolkata(West-Bengal) wrongly removed from service. The official now wants to file a Writ in Kolkata High Court. Pl. clarify the following:-
1. Whether any time limit is prescribed for filing Writ in the High Court?
2. Can the official concerned file the Writ in the State of West-Bengal i.e.his permanent residential address?
3. What are the main condition for filing such service matter Writ?
Can any body guide me how to float a colelction agency/recovery agency which under takes assignments of recovery of loan from different financial agencies. Is any specific permission, licence is required for that> etc...
Anonymous
12 December 2009 at 20:42
Whether a Drawing Officer can stop SALARY of a Govt.Servant?If it has happened,whether the Public Servant can be prosecuted u/s166 of IPC? Sanction of Prosecution u/s197 of Cr.p.c.is required or not?
ABDUL RUB.E.
12 December 2009 at 20:27
THE COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY IN KERALA STATESAYING THAT THEY ARE NOT COMING UNDER RTI ACT EVEN IF THE KERALA GOVERNEMNT POSSESSING 26% SHARE HOLDING AND THE CHIEF MINISTER OF THE KERALA IS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SAME. AND THEY ARE CLAMING THAT THEY ARE NOT A PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKING.BEING A COMPANY IT IS FULLY EMPOWERED TO ACT OF ITS OWN IN ALL MATTERS JUST LIKE ANY OTHER CITIZEN. AND WITH OUT THE PERMISSION OF KERALA GOVT. OF KERALA AND AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA THEY STARTED TO COLLECT USERS FEE FROM 14 OF APRIL 2005 AS PER THE DECISION OF ITS DIRECTOR BOARD.
THEY ARE CLAIMING THAT AS PER THE INDIAN AIRCAFT ACT AND AS PER THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT AN AIR PORT ESPECIALLY IN PRIVATE SECTOR IS FREE TO FIX AND COMETENT TO COLLECT NON- AERONOTICAL CHARGES OF ITS OWN. BUT THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA INFORMED THAT THIS COLLECTION WAS NOT WITH THEIR AUTHORITY.
RECENTLY THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT OF KERALA GIVE INFORMATION UNDER RTI THAT THE COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHOPRITY WIL COME UNDER NATIONAL RTI ACT-2005 AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT1986. BUT WHEN A PASSENGER WAS HRASSED IN THE COCHIN AIRPORT BY DELIBERATELY COLLETING HIS ORIGINAL VISA TO KUWAIT AND EMBARKED HIM TO KUWAIT. BUT THEI KUWAIT AUTHORITY DEPORTED HIM BECAUSE OF HTA HE CAN NOT PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL VISA. REGADING THIS WHEN HE MADE AN RTI APPLICATION SEEKING THE INFORMATION AND THE COPY OF THE RECORDINGS OF THE SECURITY CAMERA ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY IN CD. THE TRANSPROT PIO INFORMED HIM THAT CIAL IS NOT COME UNDER RTI ACT. AND CAN NOT PROVIDE THE INFORMATION. PLS LET US KNOW THAT HOW CAN WE DEAL WITH THIS DISGUISED AND CONFUSED INFORMATION OF GOVT PIO AND ILLEGAL ACTION OF CIAL.
suit for specific performance of the agreement, the defendant was trying to sale the property, i rushed to the court without givng notice to the dfendant filed the suit for specific performance of the suit. suit was dismissed , the trail court given the reason that i have nto given notice and i have proved readyness and willingness, i filed the appeal it is posted for arguments. is is necessary to give notice? any citations?
can i get injunction against the co-parcener not to dispossess me from the ancestal properties?
any citations?
i heard that the co parcener can not seek injunction agaisnt the other co-parcener.
thanks in advance to everybody
is it necessary to mention the provision of law in the notice to Municiplity, if not mentioned what is the consequences?
any citations?
For filing rental income
My father left a three storeyed building in which at one floor I am staying with my family in another floor mother alongwith one brother residing and complete one floor is on rent. The rental income being collected by my mother and brother and they never given any single rupee since more than twenty year. The property not yet been mutated amongst three legal shareholders. Pl. guide me on the following points:-
1. Can I file for claiming 1/3 share of my rental income and arrears of the same which I never received from them during more than 20 years?
2. What are the main condition for filing suit for rental income?
3. Is any prescribed format required for filing this suit?