bhupender sharma
22 December 2009 at 17:05
can a person whose statement has been recorded in the court and unfortunately he could cross examination him and opprtunity closed, after allowing the application under section 311 Cr.P.C the winess are recalled but they did not traced or left the given address, whether their statement can be used as substative evidence against the accused?
dasd
22 December 2009 at 17:04
139(1A) & 139(1B) operational today also?difference when we say int is compensatory in nature(234A(1)) & int is penal in nature (234B(1))?
Haridas
22 December 2009 at 15:21
The Bar Council of India (BCI) has decided to introduce age-bar in law colleges in India. what is present status. what is the upper age in 3 year LLB next year
Hari
Sanji-Paul Arvind F
22 December 2009 at 14:22
Dear Sir's,
We are a christian joint family. There were six childrens for my grandmother 3 males 3 females. All 3 men are expired (2 unmarried) and i am the eldest son's eldest son. 2 women are married and 1 unmarried is with me. I want to clarify if the 3 women can have equal share of the property which solely belongs to my grandmother and there is no will registered on the property, which is taken care by me.
Anonymous
22 December 2009 at 13:54
This is the problem in respect of separate state of “Telangana ” from Andhra Pradesh. The Central Government on 9th December,2009 announced that “ they are willing to give separate state and further announced that start the procedure”.
As against the said announcement, now the people of Andhra struggling on various aspects from various sides, resulting Andhra Pradesh is in bad condition. Even from the date of announcing, the Union Government is not in a position to controle the entire situation and simply watching. At this movement, it was heard that they are going to announce “something” with a view to controle the over all situation, today.
In this present situation can the Central Government asks all parties of MLAs to have a discussion about the situation and come forward with a suitable solution and according to their suggestions only, they can take steps or not?
Anonymous
22 December 2009 at 13:15
“A” is the DHR-Vendee and whereas “B” is the JDR-Land owner. In an Execution proceeding “B” JDR-Land owner admitted that “today he has handed over the physical possession of the lands to “A” DHr-Vendee in the year 1985.
The said JDR-Land owner has never challenged against the above contention thus it seems DHR-Vendee is in possession of the said lands since 1985. But the revenue records are shown the JDR-Land owner’s name till now.
Now I want to clarify that I am in adverse possession or not? If so how to claim the above lands on my favour, because of the said ground.?
Rajneesh Madhok
22 December 2009 at 13:07
I want to file a Civil Writ Petition against Punjab State Electricity Board, the interested lawyers/ advocates kindly send me the Private message or E-mail to me confirming their desire to take up the case with the fees in lump sum to be charged for the said case.
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar,
St. No. 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
Ph: 01824-262569 (O), 268210 (R), 094173-06415
Tele-fax:01824-262569, E-mail: rajneesh_madhok@yahoo.com
Friends,
Regarding under-mentioned case of Shifting of HT Line. I have collected the requiste information from State Information Commission, Chandigarh. From the chronological chart it is evident that the file had been lying about a year to the JE table for almost 10 months and nothing had been done. All the documents pertaining to the case are ready.
Punjab State Electricity Board Complaints - Rs in lacs depostied for shifting of high tension cables
View all Punjab State Electricity Board complaints
Punjab State Electricity Board
Posted: 2009-04-17 by Rajneesh Madhok Send email
Rs in lacs depostied for shifting of high tension cables
Punjab State Electricity Board is careless about the life & security of the consumers.
Respected Sir,
This is to inform you that my friend Mr. Narinder Pal S/o Mr. Kedar Nath of Phagwara has been facing problem that the Electric high tension wires are passing on his land. He requested the concerned Executive Engineer (XEN), Punjab State Electricity Board, G.T. Road, Goraya. The request had also been made to Senior Engineer Nawanshahar. The final estimate about the shifting charges had been calculated. Now the points to be noted.
1. Mr. Narinder Pal deposited Rs. 1, 23, 157/- vide Book No. D 91505 (Shifting fees) vide Receipt No. 226 Est No. 82001/08100 amounting to Rs.(One Lac twenty three thousand one hundred fifty seven only). On 8/5/08
2. Mr. Narinder Pal met the concerned XEN several times and he send him back on one pretext or another that the cable is not in stock.
3. Then Mr. Narinder paid Rs. 20, 000/- after 4-5 days of filing the application under the table to the XEN concerned and he promised to do the needful within 7-10 days.
4. Then Mr. Narinder Pal connected the XEN to get the job done. He said that I shall talk to the concerned SE.
5. The concerned SE has been retired recently but the job has not been done so far. Though he was the party to receive the amount of bribe.
6. Then Mr. Narinder Pal requested the concerned XEN to provide me the length of the cable required in shifting the cables from the particular site.
7. As the site plan of shifting the High tension wires had been finalized and more than one year has been passed till now, the job has not been done.
8. Today as well Mr. Narinder’s son Mr. Abhimanu called the XEN Mr. Surinder Pal Singh at his Mobile number 096461-16033 from 99152-74848 at 11:32 AM to get the job done, but he keep on making promises to do the needful.
9. When party is ready to pay for the cable in addition to the amount deposited in the department then why not the department is shifting the cables and making this or that promise.
10. I am going to request to the concerned XEN by SPEED POST for getting the job done. Whether there will be any action in this regard.
11. Whether there is any other parameter or the party has to file the suit against Punjab State Electricity board on deficiency in service’s part.
Yours truly,
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar, St. No. 2,
Railway Road, Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
Ph: 01824-262569 (O), 268210 ®, 094173-06415
Tele-fax: 01824-262569, E-mail: rajneesh_madhok@yahoo.com
RAKESH MEHRA
22 December 2009 at 12:52
sir
i have opened the given below site but my query is not solved
http://salestax.indlaw.com/vat/Db.aspx?SID=22
plz sir clear my query
thanku sir
..................../
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
assessment procedure
due date of filing return of working partner of tax audit firm--30/9 but if it is a sleeping partner whether date wil be 31/7 or 30/9.
wht is due date for filing return of any director (MD,executive directer etc) of co
since director is not mentioned in ""30/9 para""