Anonymous
16 January 2010 at 05:40
Hello,
Thanks in advance for offering the help.
Question(s) : My family owns agriculture land. My father divided the property among himself, my brother, and myself 30 years ago (when we were minor) and made my mother as guardian for me and my brother. My brother is asking me now to combine his and my property and re-divide the property claiming that he and I are joint family. He has got a caveat from the court on the land I got. He had given lawyer notice and said that he will go to court if I don’t agree to divide the property now. Second, I have built a house with my earnings and rented it.
1) He visited the house I had built on my earnings and bothered the tenants and claimed that house belongs to him. I am living in different town. All documents land etc are on my name. What I should do to stop him from entering my home?
2) What is validity period for the caveat?
3) He is planning to forcefully cultivate my land and also physically threatening me. What I should do to stop him from cultivating. I am the owner of the land. How do I have to handle physical threats?
Thanks very much
Shivam
Anonymous
16 January 2010 at 02:40
one case on me is pending in session court for theft of electricity. but the licencee work out wrong claim but i need a independent expert to work out the claim not from licencee. is court or judge will grant me a expert from pwd or from any department
Soma
16 January 2010 at 02:04
After getting the summon of a Title Suit I appeared for the defendant.
Filed an application under O.1 r.10 for addition of parties.
Date fixed on 18.12.2009 for hearing.
Failed to appear on 18.12.2009, court show caused and fixed on 13.01.2010.
As I also failed to appear on 13.01.2010 the application was rejected on that ground and further ordered that the main suit will proceeded expartee.
Now my question is whether where the application (O.1 R.10) filed and plaintiff filed objection the can the court refect the applicatio on the ground of non appearence or it should have decided ex-parte on merit?
Noe what can I do for setting aside the exparte order?
Sumir
16 January 2010 at 00:40
well this is not exactly a query to be tabled at this platform, but then too...
I being a student of Grant Medical College, Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Byculla, Mumbai-08, want to know all possible means by which the above body gets money(grants), and any substances/materials/items/things.
[don't say use RTI, since the body will not reveal all its sources, but answer the query from legal knowledge and experience- of from which all sources does a govt body (the above body is of maharashtra) that too a hospital and college get money(grants), and any substances/materials/items/things
Anonymous
16 January 2010 at 00:21
Sir,
I have resigned on 09.12.09 w.e.f. 07.01.10 after serving 6+ years in a company. Therefore I have given almost 1 month notice, as mentioned in my appointment letter. Now, Company has hold my Salary & other reimbursements, stating that all will come along with the Full & Final Settlement. All other employees has got their salaries. My question is :
1. Whether company can hold the notice period salary?? if yes, then how long?? and what about the salary from 01.12.09 to 08.12.09(Salary before notice period)?? isn't it suppose to pay along with all the others salary in the next month?? Please respond giving the reference of the concern Sections of the Law.
2. How long a company can take time to give the full and final settlement even after the notice period is over? Please respond giving the reference of the concern Sections of the Law.
3. If they are not giving the full and final settlement in time, where i will have to proceed further (out of the company) for get the F&F immediately
Please respond giving the reference of the concern Sections of the Law.
Best Regards
BKT
Neville
15 January 2010 at 21:54
Dear Sirs,
Pl inform me about this law. Cultivating government land, can we claim status under this law.
Pl revert.
Regards
Suresh C Mishra
15 January 2010 at 21:29
The PW authority has forwarded recovery certificate in an ex parte order under this Act, restoration moved and it was allowed and recovery order was taken back , in such facts whether the Recovery authority can recover the recovery charges @ of 10% in UP? if yes what is the law ?
Arvind Singh Chauhan
15 January 2010 at 20:50
Sir,
In a criminal case one prosecution witness got hostile. When there was my turn to cross examine,learned magistrate said, "if the witness turns hostile defence has no right to cross examine him, only prosecution has right". I wanted to draw out some more favourable points from this witness by cross examining him, but court objected and directed to show the provision.
Now the matter has been academic. Sir please guide me whether court's version is right. If no, plz suggest the provision or citation.
shivraj
15 January 2010 at 20:33
Whether district has jurisdiction to entertain first appeal in probate application? if senior division has decided probate then where can appeal lies against it whether district or high court?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
RTI Act and Consumer Laws
In 2009, in the case of Dr S.P.Thirumala Rao of Mysore the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission New Delhi awarded compensation and litigation cost to him in the case filed against local Municipality for deficiency in service in not attending to the matters related to his application under RTI Act 2005. The Doctor had claimed himself to be the consumer since he had paid the prescribed fee under the act to get the information. However, certain confusion requires to be discussed and cleared.Can we file a complaint before the Consumer Forum against the State's Chief Information Commissioner for keeping the Appeal u/s 19(3) RTI Act pending for the last 2 years without deciding the same? My question is that who is the responsible person for deficiency in service? Is it the SPIO/CPIO for not supplying the complete information or deemed refusal in supplying the information or the 1st Appellate Authority for supporting the conduct of the SPIO or the Chief Information Commissioner for keeping the matter pending for 2 years by not disposing of the same or all of them? Should all of them be made party? Or when the SPIO and AA have disposed the application u/s 6 and 19(1)RTI act then what is their deficiency in service? I believe that the CIC is only responsible for the delay and he should be made the party for not deciding the same. One official of the CIC (WBIC) said to me that there is no time limit for the CIC to dispose any Appeal under section 19(3)RTI Act hence no illegality has taken place. What is the opinion of the Learned Members? Kindly guide me.